Or how about this false crap you were blowing out your stinkhole. Yeah, I had to debunk this for you also. All you did is try to flip it as if you never said it really happened.So you directly responded to something I said with a non sequitur.
Let's forget about the fact that Musk's companies have gotten more than $38 billion in federal government contracts.
Have you heard of the 400 million cyber(fail)truck contract? (https://www.npr.org/2025/02/24/nx-s1-5305269/tesla-state-department-elon-musk-trump)
How about the fact that he's trying to cancel the $2 billion FAA contract with Verizon in order to give it to his own company, Starlink? (https://www.reuters.com/world/us/la...fluence-over-verizon-faa-contract-2025-02-28/)
What do you mean, why is it always Trump?
Have an adult read it and explain it to you in words you can understand.The court decision proves me wrong? By doing what? What was the court decision? It certainly wasn't **** because he wasn't convicted of **** so what are you blabbing on and on about?
So again, no **** conviction. You still haven't explained what it is to digitally penetrate someone. Does that me he poked her over wifi, land line or LAN?Have an adult read it and explain it to you in words you can understand.
This forum is for people over 13. I'm not going to use verbiage here that would normally be reserved for a child.
View attachment 64396
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-dis-crt-sd-new-yor/114642632.html
So the state department said they were abandoning a plan that never actually existed? What would there be to abandon? Seems you debunked nothing.Or how about this false crap you were blowing out your stinkhole. Yeah, I had to debunk this for you also. All you did is try to flip it as if you never said it really happened.
And you have the nerve to tell others that they are posting crap!
www.forbes.com
I did, and you didn't like it. So now you do that thing you do and flip it like you never saw it.Or you could post some factual information rather than continue to regurgitate the lies that you eat up and parrot.
Ask someone, who's getting Social Security, about how much they have put into it and how much they are getting back. Pennies is not always the case. Some get a little more and some don't get anything. My dad does not qualify for Social Security, although he worked his entire life making a lot of money. He doesn't qualify because they say he already gets too much from his retirement investments. Imagine that! The government takes your money to put in your retirement account, then says you can't have it back because you have too much money.Yes, retired folks getting pennies on the dollar compared to what they put in over their working careers in absolute nonsense. I have no idea where you heard that garbage.....but the fact that you think it's true and decided to post it here is completely in line with your pattern of repeatedly posting nonsense.
So, you're going to totally avoid my questions about Biden's mush brain? I thought you would.Of course he misspoke. His brain is mush and he's pulling levers that he doesn't understand. Plunging the country into uncertainty based on the whims of a sundowning orange blob. Brilliant!
And you say I have a mush brain. If so, this statement proves you are much worse off in the brain category. I'm the one who pointed out that there was never a contract for the Tesla trucks. You stated that Trump was the one who started looking into it. I pointed out that it was Biden who started looking into electric trucks. I'm also the one who pointed out that the Cyber Truck wasn't even mentioned by Biden.Well....you tried to claim that the Biden admin approved $400 million in Tesla Cyberdumpsters.....were proven wrong.....then tried to claim that you were correct and accused me of being 16 years old despite the fact that my account is been around for 18 years. Are you trying to set a record for being the least correct person on this forum.....because you're leading the pack in idiocy.
Difference between Biden and Trump is that Biden did very little whereas Trump is pulling every lever he can find like a child at a playground. Dementia + sociopathic behavior + below average intelligence = terrible combination in a president. Congrats on helping to elect Diaper Don and his impending disaster.
That's exactly what I told Stocker. I told Stocker that the plan was abandoned shortly after Biden mentioned looking into armored electric trucks and that Biden never mentioned the Cyber Truck. He's the one saying Trump and Musk started the whole idea and were keeping it alive.So the state department said they were abandoning a plan that never actually existed? What would there be to abandon? Seems you debunked nothing.
"The State Department said Thursday it is abandoning plans of purchasing $400 million worth of armored Tesla vehicles after a public document detailing federal contracts for fiscal year 2025 gained wide attention."
Just because Trump's DOJ wouldn't pursue a criminal case against president Musk, doesn't mean musk is clean and innocent of using his influence over the FAA/Verizon deal. Don't be so naive.
![]()
Elon Musk Conflicts Of Interest: FAA-Starlink Deal Violates Federal Law, New Complaint Alleges
Musk has long faced concerns about his Trump administration work posing a conflict of interest with his private companies.www.forbes.com
Under Biden it was less than $500,000 to do the research, and buy vehicles.That's exactly what I told Stocker. I told Stocker that the plan was abandoned shortly after Biden mentioned looking into armored electric trucks and that Biden never mentioned the Cyber Truck. He's the one saying Trump and Musk started the whole idea and were keeping it alive.
All I can say is, as men, we better hope and pray that the Trump standard doesn't become the standard for all men or any of us can fragged by some random broad from our past at any moment.And... wtf is forcibly digitally penetrated??? Just stop Rob...ffs just stop.
I thought Trump was Elon's boy toy...Under Biden it was less than $500,000 to do the research, and buy vehicles.
It suddenly leaped to $400,000,000 under the Musk-Trump administration, then the procurement document (available online) was edited from listing the vehicles as "Tesla's" to listing them as "electric vehicles".
This occurred after it was brought to light by a sharp eye, and there was talk about the conflict of interest with Trump's new boy toy getting this contract.
Stocker was not incorrect. Sorry.
Notice how the biased judge uses "****" with quotes, not straight up ****? And once again it's nothing but a bunch of mental and linguistic gymnastics from a leftist judge to say "Trump is really liable for this even though he was found liable for that. Keep in mind this is coming from the same crowd that can't answer "What is a women?"The court decision proves me wrong? By doing what? What was the court decision? It certainly wasn't **** because he wasn't convicted of **** so what are you blabbing on and on about?