Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8895352" data-attributes="member: 683408">So the state department said they were abandoning a plan that never actually existed? What would there be to abandon? Seems you debunked nothing.&quot;The State Department said Thursday it is abandoning plans of purchasing $400 million worth of armored Tesla vehicles after a public document detailing federal contracts for fiscal year 2025 gained wide attention.&quot;[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.npr.org/2025/02/24/nx-s1-5305269/tesla-state-department-elon-musk-trump[/URL]Just because Trump&#039;s DOJ wouldn&#039;t pursue a criminal case against president Musk, doesn&#039;t mean musk is clean and innocent of using his influence over the FAA/Verizon deal. Don&#039;t be so naive.[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/03/13/elon-musk-hit-with-first-formal-conflict-of-interest-complaint-over-faa-starlink-deal/[/URL]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8895352, member: 683408"] So the state department said they were abandoning a plan that never actually existed? What would there be to abandon? Seems you debunked nothing. [I]"The State Department said Thursday it is abandoning plans of purchasing $400 million worth of armored Tesla vehicles after a public document detailing federal contracts for fiscal year 2025 gained wide attention." [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.npr.org/2025/02/24/nx-s1-5305269/tesla-state-department-elon-musk-trump[/URL][/I] Just because Trump's DOJ wouldn't pursue a criminal case against president Musk, doesn't mean musk is clean and innocent of using his influence over the FAA/Verizon deal. Don't be so naive. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/03/13/elon-musk-hit-with-first-formal-conflict-of-interest-complaint-over-faa-starlink-deal/[/URL] [/QUOTE]

Verification