Do us all a favor and continue to leave out the reasons for this.
Ahhh, the "reasons". I thought "reasons" are irrelevant, and it's simply the fault of the president.
Or was that only when Biden was in office? New rules for Trump? New excuses for why he immediately failed to deliver on his promise?
You half wit glass licker. Shut the hell up. You're stupid.
Dr. Dorothy A. Fink is the Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
I gave you multiple tries to catch the ballbusting for your lack of capitalization.
Right over your head. Whoosh.
You doing it is dumb. You think by adding the constitution to your arguments that people will think you know what you are talking about. You don't.
Apparently I DO, hence why I added the info, and showed you it's not a statute.
You could try prove your claims with verifiable facts, except your claims are false.
Make a true claim, then back it up with a verifiable fact.
If it's from a textbook, I can assure you I won't think in any way you wrote the book or are learned in all aspects of what's in it.
Not sure why you assume that because I can tell you what's in the COTUS, I'm playing scholar.
You can (hopefully) tell me what molecules make up water. Would I think that is you claiming to be a chemist? Hardly.
You are probably right. I read the actual definition from 5 different dictionaries. I have NO CLUE.
You could have read it from a dozen dictionaries. That means nothing since you obviously didn't comprehend it.
ad hominem is an attack on the person and not the topic.
Your anti-COTUS views and your pro-Communist views are BOTH yours.
Anyone can if they actually argue with facts, proof, evidence... but you don't. You still haven't shared the statute that makes the offer illegal.
Good lord, you are dull. STATUE is a state law. FEDERAL workers are under FEDERAL regulation.
The CONSTITUTION says that Trump does not have the power of the purse. Let's try again. I underlined and bolded some words to help you out:
"No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.”
— U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 9, clause 7
Trump doesn't make law. Trump doesn't interpret law. Trump is not Congress. Congress decides where the money gets spent.
Get it yet, or still flummoxed?
There is nothing negative about it. Go do some background research on all those people and tell us what you find fraud man.
Holy shit. "Negative" does NOT mean "lacking positive qualities" in this discussion. It means a lack of existence.
You're asking me to disprove something that has yet to be proved. That means you are asking me to "disprove a negative".
If I ask you to disprove that there is a ceramic coffee pot orbiting Mars with a cat in it, I'd be asking you to disprove a negative. NO ONE has proved such a thing exists.
You want me to disprove things about Musks nerd herd that have never been proved. That's not how it works.
Get it?
Again... is that what your brain put together for you to ask?
And you still haven't explained why you are speaking to what Slapper had in HIS mind when he made the post.
You a mindreader? You sitting in his pocket? Is he in yours?
If you learned how to read and comprehend you could easily pick up the sarcasm. You know, when I shifted the topic over to you telling me what I can post in the thread like you own this place.
Kind you like you missing the ballbusting about your lack of capitalization of "secretary".
Touche`
