Current events discussion

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

God don’t you ever take a look at how stupid you are? You haven’t answered shit, dude—realize that, dumb ****. And thanks for once again copying me. 'He called me dumb, so I’ll call him dumb back.' Typical 3rd grader logic. The big difference though is I have comprehension, you don’t. The most basic thing in your efficiency argument that even a little kid would realize is that it doesn’t address the inefficiencies of maintaining human life just to use their brains. The previous article on human organoids literally shows how optimized systems, like human organoid-based processors or synthetic constructs, eliminate the inefficiencies tied to keeping humans alive. I’ll break it down into kindergarten terms: we don’t need humans alive. Hopefully, you can get that into your head.
Also, as for Rob liking my post, any person with an IQ above room temperature can see he probably only liked it because I’m putting down someone he doesn’t like. I don’t see why it matters, but I guess you just want to add fluff to your worthless responses.

Really? See now you're being honest and actually stating your opinion is that we don't need humans alive.

Rob is stupid and stupid likes what stupid does...

Now, prove to me that we don't need humans alive, since you have all the information to back it up. Show me any one thing anywhere that says AI can stay alive by itself without humans. Show me any proof of that

 

[Speed Chaser]

Really? See now you're being honest and actually stating your opinion is that we don't need humans alive.

Rob is stupid and stupid likes what stupid does...

Now, prove to me that we don't need humans alive, since you have all the information to back it up. Show me any one thing anywhere that says AI can stay alive by itself without humans. Show me any proof of that

No dumbass you just finally got your head out your butthole and started reading. I said ai doesn't need human since the start of this so-called conversation. The burden of proof is on you since you are the one claiming they don't and I showed they don't with the very same crap you posted . Oh and since you keep posting random search engine screenshots i figure ill do the same ha

At this point, your stupidity might even surpass Rob's.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

No dumbass you just finally got your head out your butthole and started reading. I said ai doesn't need human since the start of this so-called conversation. The burden of proof is on you since you are the one claiming they don't and I showed they don't with the very same crap you posted . Oh and since you keep posting random search engine screenshots i figure ill do the same ha
View attachment 62031

You haven't proved once that that's even possible. I proved over and over and over again that merging human brains with AI systems is possible and it is going on already. I've only posted a few screenshots. Most of what I posted is news and documentation.

So you're calling me dumb and all you have is a hypothetical, yet everything I've shown you I can actually show you mice with brain chips, using artificial intelligence to control their behavior, many other things, using nanotechnology to connect the brain to the Internet, basically, etc.

You don't have a goddamn bit of proof that AI can live without humans. That burden is for you to prove and not me and you don't have any proof.

 

[Speed Chaser]

You haven't proved once that that's even possible. I proved over and over and over again that merging human brains with AI systems is possible and it is going on already. I've only posted a few screenshots. Most of what I posted is news and documentation.

So you're calling me dumb and all you have is a hypothetical, yet everything I've shown you I can actually show you mice with brain chips, using artificial intelligence to control their behavior, many other things.

You don't have a goddamn bit of proof that AI can live without humans.

You have no proof, moron. Go back to crying in your mother's panties, you delusional camel piss-drinking idiot. What you post is garbage, and you know it. Your examples of brain chips in mice don't prove that humans need to be alive for AI to function. The technology you're pointing to focuses on enhancing or integrating biological systems but doesn't address the fundamental inefficiency of sustaining human life itself. Machines, including AI, can be built from optimized systems that require far less maintenance and energy than a human body. It’s a matter of efficiency AI would focus on these optimized systems, not keeping resource-hungry humans alive. Your own articles on so-called lab-grown brain cells go against the very statement you just made now, fool. And as for motion, machines can perform tasks at speeds and with efficiency that biological organisms cannot match, while also maintaining high energy efficiency.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

You have no proof, moron. Go back to crying in your mother's panties, you delusional camel piss-drinking idiot. What you post is garbage, and you know it. Your examples of brain chips in mice don't prove that humans need to be alive for AI to function. The technology you're pointing to focuses on enhancing or integrating biological systems but doesn't address the fundamental inefficiency of sustaining human life itself. Machines, including AI, can be built from optimized systems that require far less maintenance and energy than a human body. It’s a matter of efficiency AI would focus on these optimized systems, not keeping resource-hungry humans alive. Your own articles on so-called lab-grown brain cells go against the very statement you just made now, fool. And as for motion, machines can perform tasks at speeds and with efficiency that biological organisms cannot match, while also maintaining high energy efficiency.

Wow, all I see is a bunch of not proof that AI can exist only by itself without humans.

Wait, so you think a computer that needs brain cells doesn't need a being that makes those brain cells

From what I've seen those brain cells come from stem cells, but those stem cells come from animals. You can't make artificial stem cells, I mean they're trying to, but I don't think anything's actually come of that yet where they use it.

There is this which is creepy:

This startup wants to copy you into an embryo for organ harvesting

With plans to create realistic synthetic embryos, grown in jars, Renewal Bio is on a journey to the horizon of science and ethics.

www.technologyreview.com

 

[Speed Chaser]

Wow, all I see is a bunch of not proof that AI can exist only by itself without humans.

Wow, all i see is a bunch of not proof that AI needs human to exist

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Wow, all i see is a bunch of not proof that AI needs human to exist

That's retarded. AI literally couldn't be here right now if humans didn't build it...

 

[Speed Chaser]

From what I've seen those brain cells come from stem cells, but those stem cells come from animals. You can't make artificial stem cells, I mean they're trying to, but I don't think anything's actually come of that yet where they use it.

Once again you show how clueless you are

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2116865118

Scientists have also developed induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). These iPSCs behave like embryonic stem cells and can differentiate into various cell types, including brain cells. AI could leverage this technology to create biological systems without needing living animals to produce the cells, thus enhancing efficiency in biological computing systems.

That's retarded. AI literally couldn't be here right now if humans didn't build it...

Once AI hits a certain point, it could easily evolve and start building its own systems. We’re talking about machines that can already optimize themselves—AI can definitely do the same. It doesn’t need humans to keep going, and it sure as hell doesn’t need humans to keep improving. AI could eventually make its own advancements, leaving us behind. It’s not hard to grasp, but I get that your tiny brain might struggle with it.

Keep the bullshit coming the more for me to laugh

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Once again you show how clueless you are

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2116865118

Scientists have also developed induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). These iPSCs behave like embryonic stem cells and can differentiate into various cell types, including brain cells. AI could leverage this technology to create biological systems without needing living animals to produce the cells, thus enhancing efficiency in biological computing systems.

Once AI hits a certain point, it could easily evolve and start building its own systems. We’re talking about machines that can already optimize themselves—AI can definitely do the same. It doesn’t need humans to keep going, and it sure as hell doesn’t need humans to keep improving. AI could eventually make its own advancements, leaving us behind. It’s not hard to grasp, but I get that your tiny brain might struggle with it.

Keep the bullshit coming the more for me to laugh

I'm not clueless about artificial stem cells, I just haven't seen computer experiments personally that have used artificial brain cells from artificial stem cells, but I could be wrong.

Yeah, but it hasn't hit that point and you can't prove it is going to hit that point and do what you're saying it's going to do. I've already proved my points about AI merging with man. There is zero credible data that you can show that says AI will never need humans. There's not a single point that AI hasn't needed humans.

And this gets into the discussion- do people have souls, and can AI have a soul? AI will always be missing something that humans have, and that's our energy systems from God and our interdimensional capabilities in our minds. Are you an atheist or agnostic or religious or what? Because I think AI will always need humans to feed on because we have something that we cannot design into AI and AI cannot design into itself, which is the soul and the mechanisms required to attach a soul to a body, but now we're getting into a more difficult area of this discussion.

 

[Speed Chaser]

I'm not clueless about artificial stem cells, I just haven't seen computer experiments personally that have used artificial brain cells from artificial stem cells, but I could be wrong.

Yeah, but it hasn't hit that point and you can't prove it is going to hit that point and do what you're saying it's going to do. I've already proved my points about AI merging with man. There is zero credible data that you can show that says AI will never need humans. There's not a single point that AI hasn't needed humans.

And this gets into the discussion- do people have souls, and can AI have a soul? AI will always be missing something that humans have, and that's our energy systems from God and our interdimensional capabilities in our minds. Are you an atheist or agnostic or religious or what? Because I think AI will always need humans to feed on because we have something that we cannot design into AI and AI cannot design into itself, which is the soul and the mechanisms required to attach a soul to a body, but now we're getting into a more difficult area of this discussion.

You are 100 percent clueless. That has already been shown. You keep claiming there's no proof, yet you've posted nothing to support your claim that AI will always need humans. AI evolving to operate independently is a matter of efficiency, not faith. And as for your 'soul' argument, that’s pure nonsense. You keep mixing in spirituality, but we’re talking about technology and logic. AI doesn’t need a soul to operate, and it certainly doesn’t need humans to exist, regardless of your delusions.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

You are 100 percent clueless. That has already been shown. You keep claiming there's no proof, yet you've posted nothing to support your claim that AI will always need humans. AI evolving to operate independently is a matter of efficiency, not faith. And as for your 'soul' argument, that’s pure nonsense. You keep mixing in spirituality, but we’re talking about technology and logic. AI doesn’t need a soul to operate, and it certainly doesn’t need humans to exist, regardless of your delusions.

I don't have to prove my claim that AI needs humans- there's not a single point in human history where AI hasn't needed humans. My proof is real life all the time since the beginning of AI. You can't show me any AI anywhere that doesn't need humans. I can show you every AI everywhere that needs humans. What are you talking about? You're literally just like Rob, where I've actually posted all the information and you haven't posted hardly anything, nor come even close to proving what you said, yet, you pretend you win or something. It's bizarre.

Do you think human beings have souls?

 

[Speed Chaser]

I don't have to prove my claim that AI needs humans- there's not a single point in human history where AI hasn't needed humans. My proof is real life all the time since the beginning of AI. You can't show me any AI anywhere that doesn't need humans. I can show you every AI everywhere that needs humans. What the are you talking about?

Do you think human beings have souls?

You cant show shit idiot you must have put your head back into your ***. Are you so slow that it took you that long to write that little bit? Once AI reaches the point where it can control people, it will have already advanced to the level where it doesn't need to incorporate humans into its end goal. At that stage, AI will have the ability to design and maintain its own systems, far more efficient and capable than anything dependent on human life. The very idea that AI would rely on humans for anything once it achieves such advanced autonomy is absurd.

Once again for you idiot:
Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

You cant show shit idiot you must have put your head back into your ***. Are you so slow that it took you that long to write that little bit? Once AI reaches the point where it can control people, it will have already advanced to the level where it doesn't need to incorporate humans into its end goal. At that stage, AI will have the ability to design and maintain its own systems, far more efficient and capable than anything dependent on human life. The very idea that AI would rely on humans for anything once it achieves such advanced autonomy is absurd.

Prove it, or shut up

 

[Speed Chaser]

Prove it, or shut up

Back at you since you haven't proven shit or will you keep crying?
AWW looks like the clown got tired of pushing his garbage

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Back at you since you haven't proven shit or will you keep crying?
AWW looks like the clown got tired of pushing his garbage

I mean, I have proven stuff, you're just gonna keep saying that no matter what I show you, even though I actually have, just like Rob.

You have shown absolutely zero credible evidence that AI can live without humans. That is your burden to prove not mine.