Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Speed Chaser" data-source="post: 8886092" data-attributes="member: 690887"><p>You have no proof, moron. Go back to crying in your mother's panties, you delusional camel piss-drinking idiot. What you post is garbage, and you know it. Your examples of brain chips in mice don't prove that humans need to be alive for AI to function. The technology you're pointing to focuses on enhancing or integrating biological systems but doesn't address the fundamental inefficiency of sustaining human life itself. Machines, including AI, can be built from optimized systems that require far less maintenance and energy than a human body. It’s a matter of efficiency AI would focus on these optimized systems, not keeping resource-hungry humans alive. Your own articles on so-called lab-grown brain cells go against the very statement you just made now, fool. And as for motion, machines can perform tasks at speeds and with efficiency that biological organisms cannot match, while also maintaining high energy efficiency.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Speed Chaser, post: 8886092, member: 690887"] You have no proof, moron. Go back to crying in your mother's panties, you delusional camel piss-drinking idiot. What you post is garbage, and you know it. Your examples of brain chips in mice don't prove that humans need to be alive for AI to function. The technology you're pointing to focuses on enhancing or integrating biological systems but doesn't address the fundamental inefficiency of sustaining human life itself. Machines, including AI, can be built from optimized systems that require far less maintenance and energy than a human body. It’s a matter of efficiency AI would focus on these optimized systems, not keeping resource-hungry humans alive. Your own articles on so-called lab-grown brain cells go against the very statement you just made now, fool. And as for motion, machines can perform tasks at speeds and with efficiency that biological organisms cannot match, while also maintaining high energy efficiency. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list