Current events discussion
- Thread starter Jimi77
- Live activity
- Replies 33K
- Views 444K
-
- Tags
- constitutional trump
Buck
5,000+ posts
little alien on campus
Last edited:
You’re clearly mad since you came back even after saying you don’t care but we all knew you were lying when you said that. I’ve proven you wrong on everything you’ve said. Just like you’re too stupid to understand the stuff you post, you’re too stupid or delusional from drinking your own Kool-Aid to see that you’re wrong.
Why would I have a conversation with someone who started by bitching? Answer me that. Answer me why AI would use humans instead of creating its own more efficient biological processing unit/brain? Answer me that.
This started with AI I’ve tried to keep it on topic, but your ADHD *** can’t stay focused because you have no argument. That’s why, in every response, you try to change the topic. I’m pretty sure next you’re going to say, ‘Well, drones have AI connected to them, so that makes them AI-related.’ Typical third-grader logic.
The White House has talked about drag storytime, too. Does everything the White House mentions automatically make it important?
Last edited:
Buck
5,000+ posts
little alien on campus
I'm not mad. You remind me of Rob, because I have already answered those things, no matter how in detail I give an answer, you say the same thing like I've posted nothing, even though I've literally given you military documentation.
AI is a broad-spectrum topic, and everything that I've mentioned is related to it. It's just like computers. You know they run everything now, are used in every part of life basically.
I really don't understand your general attitude towards the drone topic, especially since it's all over the news. Normal people and ex military and mayors and the White House and federal officials and a bunch of people are talking about it, they seem to be flying near our military bases and over important places and the government telling us they don't know what they are. It's happening over other military bases in other countries too, such as the UK and Germany. Isn't that mildly important, considering the amount of wars we are involved in overseas at the same time?
Last edited:
OP
Jimi77
Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
- Thread Starter
- #6,306
CPI has been fake "forever." Lots of articles have been written about it's shortcomings. Clearly the charts on groceries are off by a mile. They're claiming I
Nope, but when we're talking groceries and the gov't has the nerve to say there has barely been inflation in groceries and everybody else seems to think their grocery bill has doubled in the last ~3 years, I think we can ignore the gov't numbers. The gov't also been playing fast and loose with crime stats and job stats. Additionally, they're telling "me" there is no Venezuelan crime wave in Aurora, but they have video of these gang members extorting renters, there was rolling gun battle down a major thoroughfare and I can no longer take my kids to a nearby park due to Venezuelan gang presence. They tried to deny the drones too - again caught on tape. If the gov't is going to say things that are blatantly false, then people are going to ignore those stats.
Nope, but when we're talking groceries and the gov't has the nerve to say there has barely been inflation in groceries and everybody else seems to think their grocery bill has doubled in the last ~3 years, I think we can ignore the gov't numbers. The gov't also been playing fast and loose with crime stats and job stats. Additionally, they're telling "me" there is no Venezuelan crime wave in Aurora, but they have video of these gang members extorting renters, there was rolling gun battle down a major thoroughfare and I can no longer take my kids to a nearby park due to Venezuelan gang presence. They tried to deny the drones too - again caught on tape. If the gov't is going to say things that are blatantly false, then people are going to ignore those stats.
ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
That has nothing to do with what I'm talking about or what the news is talking about with the drones everywhere. The 1970s was 50 years ago, so what the hell are you even talking about? Yeah, I flew a radio drone when I was a little kid too, you moron. Oh, wow, I bet you use the RC cars too! Nobody's ever done that before!Has nothing to do with what's going on
And you think the drones everywhere today are more than just a technological progression of the very first r/c plane?
They have navigation lights following FAA guidelines. They're not AI taking over the world. They're not aliens.
Yet you voted a ****** into office.
ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
Buck
5,000+ posts
little alien on campus
The context you put it in makes it sound like you're saying I said those things exactly but I didn't. The context you present so bullshit Rob. Obviously technology is a progression of all previous technology. Nobody is saying anything otherwise and you're kinda dumb for bringing that point in like that.
I didn't say it was AI taking over the world specifically at this time related to these drones, I said, don't you think these drones could be connected to AI? Such as the pilots are AI pilots or an AI bot like the military is testing and developing and is an already in use in some fashions.
They aren't really following FAA rules. You are correct that many of them have, or seemingly have proper indication, lights on them for flying. I don't think they're aliens and I never said I did. I already answered this for you is I think it is our military technology that's being used as a psychological warfare operation and as muscle flexing of our technology to our enemies overseas. The Pentagon in the DOD, and pretty much every military branch and pretty much every major countries developing AI powered drones forms for warfare. Even Elon Musk says this is the future, but it's obvious if you even moderately keep up with it, keep up with the war news, which I can tell the people who argue against me the most definitely do not.
Elon Musk said the F-35's makers are 'idiots' for still building manned jets as drone tech rises
Musk, who is set to advise President-elect Donald Trump on government efficiency, has said before that the F-35 program would lose to a drone fighter.
www.businessinsider.com
Elon Musk Criticized The F-35—Called For Armed Drones Instead
Aviation buffs quickly offered rebuttals highlighting the aircraft's capabilities and noted that China has gone to great lengths to copy the capabilities of the F-35
www.forbes.com
Here's some info on our military replicator program:
Pentagon picks programmers to connect its Replicator drone swarms
The announcement comes a week after the Pentagon revealed several of the drones it plans to buy through Replicator.
www.defensenews.com
AI for military uses: Inside DOD’s new unit
Threat Status: The world is a pretty scary place. We'll help you navigate the hazards at home -- and over the horizon.
www.washingtontimes.com
Last edited:
You're not mad? Yeah, sure, because coming back over and over with the same weak arguments screams 'calm and collected,' right? All you’ve done is dodge the central AI topic while spouting tangential nonsense. That’s exactly why I don’t care about your drone topic—it’s irrelevant to the core issue of an all-powerful AI, which is what this argument is supposed to be about, not its unrelated byproducts.
Funny how I compared you to Rob earlier, and now you’re parroting me because you can’t come up with anything original. You haven’t answered anything, idiot. What details are you even talking about? The only person breaking down articles with actual points is me. You just keep posting stuff that ends up supporting my argument instead of yours, you moron.
Since you’ve dodged it again, I’ll ask for the nth time: Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans? Answer me that.
OR better yet, if you don’t plan to answer, move TF on and go cry to someone else because I’m not here to hold the hand of a grown man.
Buck
5,000+ posts
little alien on campus
I didn't dodge anything; I've been talking about it the same way before you've ever been here. I literally have answered it, but I think you're too stupid to understand
Rob keeps liking your posts and not mine FYI. That should tell you something about yourself...
Human brains are the most efficient processor. I already showed you that in an article that you supposedly read and broke down. AI takes a lot of power to run. Human brains are more efficient processors for the work that they do, so AI will be able to do more processing with less power by using human brains, such as wiring a human brain with a brain chip or wireless nano technology. I literally shared science articles with you that said that about the brain, efficiency part, and you claim to have read them.
"Let’s start our journey by diving into the intricate world of the human brain. This three-pound organ, tucked away in our skulls, is arguably the most complex structure in the known universe."
"When it comes to raw processing power, supercomputers are in a league of their own....However, this computational might comes at a cost. Supercomputers are energy-hungry beasts, often consuming megawatts of power and requiring extensive cooling systems to prevent overheating. The contrast with the brain’s energy efficiency couldn’t be starker."
"While AI systems have shown impressive results in specific creative tasks, such as generating art or composing music, they still lack the general creative problem-solving abilities that humans possess. The brain’s ability to make unexpected connections, think abstractly, and come up with novel solutions is something that current AI systems struggle to replicate."
Human Brain vs Supercomputer: Comparing Nature's Masterpiece to Silicon Giants
Explore the fascinating comparison between the human brain and supercomputers, examining their strengths, weaknesses, and future implications for AI development.
neurolaunch.com
The most efficient computer is going to be a mix of human brains and artificial intelligence or AI computational machinery. I've literally posted nauseating amounts of it, but you still can't get it for some goddamn reason. Literally, I've been saying the same thing over and over and you said I've been showing you no proof
Everyone and their mama is working on technology based around merging man and machine.
Here's another:
MSN
www.msn.com
They can plug stuff into your brain instead of growing brain cells on the computer chips and have a similar or the same affect, where a computer or AI can use your brain to compute for it.
Here's some more from MIT, you know those silly dumb people working on the merging man and machine:
"The work, published today in Nature Electronics, could one day lead to new kinds of bio-computers that are more efficient than conventional computers."
Human brain cells hooked up to a chip can do speech recognition
Clusters of brain cells grown in the lab have shown potential as a new type of hybrid bio-computer.
They're all saying what I'm saying
Last edited:
God don’t you ever take a look at how stupid you are? You haven’t answered shit, dude—realize that, dumb ****. And thanks for once again copying me. 'He called me dumb, so I’ll call him dumb back.' Typical 3rd grader logic. The big difference though is I have comprehension, you don’t. The most basic thing in your efficiency argument that even a little kid would realize is that it doesn’t address the inefficiencies of maintaining human life just to use their brains. The previous article on human organoids literally shows how optimized systems, like human organoid-based processors or synthetic constructs, eliminate the inefficiencies tied to keeping humans alive. I’ll break it down into kindergarten terms: we don’t need humans alive. Hopefully, you can get that into your head.I didn't dodge anything; I've been talking about it the same way before you've ever been here. I literally have answered it, but I think you're too stupid to understand
Rob keeps liking your posts and not mine FYI. That should tell you something about yourself...
Human brains are the most efficient processor. I already showed you that in an article that you supposedly read and broke down. AI takes a lot of power to run. Human brains are more efficient processors for the work that they do, so AI will be able to do more processing with less power by using human brains, such as wiring a human brain with a brain chip or wireless nano technology. I literally shared science articles with you that said that about the brain, efficiency part, and you claim to have read them.
"Let’s start our journey by diving into the intricate world of the human brain. This three-pound organ, tucked away in our skulls, is arguably the most complex structure in the known universe."
"When it comes to raw processing power, supercomputers are in a league of their own....However, this computational might comes at a cost. Supercomputers are energy-hungry beasts, often consuming megawatts of power and requiring extensive cooling systems to prevent overheating. The contrast with the brain’s energy efficiency couldn’t be starker."
"While AI systems have shown impressive results in specific creative tasks, such as generating art or composing music, they still lack the general creative problem-solving abilities that humans possess. The brain’s ability to make unexpected connections, think abstractly, and come up with novel solutions is something that current AI systems struggle to replicate."
Human Brain vs Supercomputer: Comparing Nature's Masterpiece to Silicon Giants
Explore the fascinating comparison between the human brain and supercomputers, examining their strengths, weaknesses, and future implications for AI development.
The most efficient computer is going to be a mix of human brains and artificial intelligence or AI computational machinery. I've literally posted nauseating amounts of it, but you still can't get it for some goddamn reason. Literally, I've been saying the same thing over and over and you said I've been showing you no proof
Everyone and their mama is working on technology based around merging man and machine.
Also, as for Rob liking my post, any person with an IQ above room temperature can see he probably only liked it because I’m putting down someone he doesn’t like. I don’t see why it matters, but I guess you just want to add fluff to your worthless responses.
So I am going to ask again
Why would AI waste time on inefficient humans when it could create optimized biological systems that don’t have the upkeep requirements of humans?
Last edited:
ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
I am still waiting for RobGMN to admit he will use partial quotes to make people look like they said something else by leaving out words and disregarding context.
Will you Rob, will you now admit it?
Will you Rob, will you now admit it?
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Similar threads
About this thread
- Start date
- Participants
- Who Replied
- Replies
- 32,709
- Views
- 444,356
- Last reply date
- Last reply from
- ThxOne
