It's circumstantial, and I see why it could lead one to think "yeah, it was leaked".I think this is a pretty good amount info here imo
- Former NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci and Former NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins were directly involved in the drafting, publication, and public promotion of Proximal Origin — a paper written to suppress the COVID-19 lab-leak hypothesis.
- There was a coordinated effort between public health officials in the United States government and expert scientists to craft a narrative that would advance the zoonotic origin of COVID-19 in order to protect the Chinese government from any potential criticism and repercussions.
- The conclusions drawn by the co-authors of “Proximal Origin” rest on insufficient evidence, draw inaccurate assumptions, and have never been proven or verified by the wider scientific community.
- Dr. Kristian Andersen confirmed the U.S. funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology fell below recommended bio-safety markers.
- Scientific integrity was abandoned by Dr. Fauci, Dr. Collins, and the co-authors of Proximal Origin in favor of political expediency. Suppressing a legitimate scientific theory to advance the preferred narrative of senior government officials is egregious and must be fully investigated.
- There is still more work to be done to hold public health officials accountable for their actions during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Select Subcommittee emphasizes its outstanding request for transcribed interviews and documents from Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins.
![]()
But Thxone's post about the CIA being dirty and so therefore they lied about this is circumstantial too.
It is on presidential record that Trump lied to the pulblic at least 21,000 times. Does that mean every single thing he ever said was a lie? No.
Trump used $10,000 in donations from his charity to buy a painting of himself. Does that mean he used every single donation in a way he should not have? No.
We have this, and we have the recent report done independently of Fauci, et al, that says there was no progenitor in the lab.
Which one do we accept?
Last edited:
