if you think drug testing is going to crack the case, then that must be the way YOU see it.Is that the way YOU see it?
I'm not psychic. I can't tell you how many would fail the test. But I will virtually guarantee that if you tested the 6,000 people per day that go through the White House, there will be more than one that tests positive.Now you are being hypothetical instead of realistic. Pick a lane and stay in it Rob.
Fired for WHAT? Drug testing is not part of their contract.Then the staffer is fired. We are talking about the White House. National Security Risk. A person willing to break the law so easily could be compromised to give away secrets. Use your brain, if you have one.
A lead to WHAT? You beat up women. Does that mean you are a suspect in a murder case in San Diego?A failed drug test is a lead.
When I was in 2nd grade I sure did. When I was in 2nd grade I may even have liked older ones too.And you like 2nd grade girls...................... and grown men.
You know, you seem to be justifying this situation like you justify drag shows around minor children. Why are you doing that Rob?if you think drug testing is going to crack the case, then that must be the way YOU see it.
If not, then what end do you think drug testing will achieve?
I'm not psychic. I can't tell you how many would fail the test. But I will virtually guarantee that if you tested the 6,000 people per day that go through the White House, there will be more than one that tests positive.
MTwo is more than one. If TWO test positive, which one left the coke?
Fired for WHAT? Drug testing is not part of their contract.
Or do you think an employment contract is just a do-as-you-go prospect?
A lead to WHAT? You beat up women. Does that mean you are a suspect in a murder case in San Diego?
You drive a Ford. Does that mean you were with OJ and helped him murder Nicole?
When I was in 2nd grade I sure did. When I was in 2nd grade I may even have liked older ones too.
Men? Not my bag. Sure seems to be yours. Have a party. No one with a clue about life cares what you like, except for your weird desire to see me as a child. Put a lid on that shit, and quickly.
You asked him for pics buddy![]()
No Booby, you wanted him to post pics so you could obtain them without looking for them yourself. Wow you are really sick!!Because I wanted him to post proof of what he was claiming. He said he already posted them. He said he had them saved in his computer. Nice try. And I ignored them.
View attachment 50339
Approx 42,000 people visit the White house PER WEEK.If 157 people frequenting the wh are using coke...then there's a whole new problem.![]()
No Booby, you wanted him to post pics so you could obtain them without looking for them yourself. Wow you are really sick!!
Buck said that he searched for and found the pedo pics.No Booby, you wanted him to post pics so you could obtain them without looking for them yourself. Wow you are really sick!!
No...you wanted to see inappropriate pics of kids...Because I wanted him to post proof of what he was claiming. He said he already posted them. He said he had them saved in his computer. Nice try. And I ignored them.
View attachment 50339
Approx 42,000 people visit the White house PER WEEK.
About 1.7% of the US public over the age of 12 have used cocaine in the past year.
Statistically, that's about 714 coke users going through the WH per week if they were all over 12. If only HALF of the visitors were over 12, then it's still 357 people per week.
A bit more than 157, eh?
I was there. Or do you not remember. He was talking about LINKS to these pics and videos. Idiot.
That is not what he said.Buck said that he searched for and found the pedo pics.
That's on him. Why are you defending an admitted pedo?
Hmmm, it seems I know a bit more about investigations and how to determine what happened than you do.You know, you seem to be justifying this situation like you justify drag shows around minor children. Why are you doing that Rob?
And you're backing a guy who asked for inappropriate pics of children![]()
LOL no, it doesn't seem that way at all. Stop tooting your own horn Rob.Hmmm, it seems I know a bit more about investigations and how to determine what happened than you do.
Not bad for a "secretary", huh?
So please:
Explain what a drug test of all people who could have dropped the coke would prove.
Explain why you think it would be OK to force people (workers and the visiting public) to get tested for cocaine use.
Explain what happens when multiple people test positive. Statistically speaking, up to 714 people per week.