Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nobody wants gov't until they want gov't. Keep your hands off my guns, but make sure women can't have abortions.
"WE WANT TO SECEDE FROM THE US"
"Until we need help"

1679805985918.png
 
Ohhhhh, you were using the non-****** definition when discussing ****** activities.
That makes total sense.

No wonder you constantly whine that no one understands you. You speak a language all your own, that no one has the Rosetta Stone to decipher.

Cool. Yesterday I installed a concrete in my car. It really improved the torque from the spinners in the sprocket box.
Maybe it’s just because I listen to cryogenics.

So when you describe homosexuality as a perversion, you are saying that it’s OK with you, just like the “perversion” of not conceiving during ***.
So then why all the anti-homosexual rhetoric?
Stop getting pissed at people because your autism gets in the way of your comprehension and you always choose the wrong meanings. I used the definition that was prudent to my post. I bet you are great with a Rubix's Cube though.
 
Stop getting pissed at people because your autism gets in the way of your comprehension and you always choose the wrong meanings. I used the definition that was prudent to my post. I bet you are great with a Rubix's Cube though.
You’re literally a mental defective.

Now you expect people to know that you are relying on two different definitions of the word “perversion” when you are using it at different times in the same discussion about sexuality.

So you think heterosexual *** that doesn’t result in conception is abnormal or unacceptable, but homosexual *** is simply an alteration from the usual course.

Why then are you so upset about homosexuality if it’s not abnormal or unacceptable?
 
You’re literally a mental defective.

Now you expect people to know that you are relying on two different definitions of the word “perversion” when you are using it at different times in the same discussion about sexuality.

So you think heterosexual *** that doesn’t result in conception is abnormal or unacceptable, but homosexual *** is simply an alteration from the usual course.

Why then are you so upset about homosexuality if it’s not abnormal or unacceptable?
Do we all need to slow down so you can catch up and understand? If you had half a brain it should be obvious what meaning is associated with a given post. That has never been your goal, to understand, you are here to debate and argue.

You know damn well what I said. I have said the same thing to you several times. You keep trying to add shit to what I said as if I actually said it. I never said it is abnormal or unacceptable you dumbasss. I said it is a perversion of what *** is intended for which is reproduction. Clearly you are not adult enough to understand this nor have a conversation about it. Move the fuck on idiot.
 
Last edited:
Do we all need to slow down so you can catch up and understand? If you had half a brain it should be obvious what meaning is associated with a given post. That has never been your goal, to understand, you are here to debate and argue.

You know damn well what I said. I have said the same thing to you several times. You keep trying to add shit to what I said as if I actually said it. I never said it is abnormal or unacceptable you dumbasss. I said it is a perversion of what *** is intended for which is reproduction. Clearly you are not adult enough to understand this nor have a conversation about it. Move the fuck on idiot.
Yes.
Heterosexual *** without conception is abnormal or unacceptable.
Homosexual *** is merely an alteration from the usual course.

This is what you said. Fair enough.

Is heterosexual *** without conception abnormal and unacceptable only when conception is intentionally prevented in some way, or also if it just fails to occur?
What if it’s prevented naturally (withdraw) versus with contraception?
Both abnormal and unacceptable, or just one?
 
Last edited:
Yes.
Heterosexual *** without conception is abnormal or unacceptable.
Homosexual *** is merely an alteration from the usual course.

This is what you said. Fair enough.
Show me then. Show me where I said that.
Is heterosexual *** without conception abnormal and unacceptable only when conception is intentionally prevented in some way, or also if it just fails to occur?
You tell me, it is the theory you have come up with.
What if it’s prevented naturally (withdraw) versus with contraception?
Both abnormal and unacceptable, or just one?
Again... you are running with your own bullshit again. You tell me.
 
Show me then. Show me where I said that.
These are the words YOU posted.
“That doesn't change biological FACTS that *** is for reproduction and anything other than that sexually is a perversion.”
“If they can't reproduce then they have *** for pleasure. A perversion. Just like I said.”
Or was it the frog in your pocket doing the typing?
You tell me, it is the theory you have come up with.
YOU said it’s a perversion. Since it can happen naturally, is that a perversion too?
Try and follow the logic. It’s really not complicated. Answer the question.

Again... you are running with your own bullshit again. You tell me.
It’s YOUR theories in question here. Contradictory theories that you seem to have a lot of difficulty supporting, but your theories nonetheless.

Why do you think heterosexual *** is abnormal and unacceptable, and homosexual *** is just an alteration of the course, yet act as if you are very anti-homosexual?
You’re all over the map.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,102,790
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260515_202650612_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260515_202732887_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top