Winners only.

[RobGMN]

Yeah, if he got arrested, just to piss you Democrats off. I think it would be a hoot. Doesn't mean I "want" him back.

Ohh. So if he gets arrested you’ll vote for him just to piss people off.

Are you going to stand on streetcorners with a sign, or a banner on your car to announce it?

And you think I’m wrong when I say there are certain people who simply shouldn’t vote.

 

[ThxOne]

Ohh. So if he gets arrested you’ll vote for him just to piss people off.

Are democrats people?

 

[RobGMN]

Are democrats people?

Apparently moreso than Republicans. Seems most of the Republicans here are just Russian bots reposting misinformation from other sites.

 

[ThxOne]

Apparently moreso than Republicans. Seems most of the Republicans here are just Russian bots reposting misinformation from other sites.

And Democrats want to molest kids and cut their own weenies off.

 

[Jimi77]

What I mean is could he be grouping it all together by saying contraception when he means the contraception companies?

Who knows what he meant. I'd love to hear the reasoning behind why the gov't needs to get involved in contraception. And for the most part neo-conservatives seem to have accepted gay relationships and marriage, so I don't understand why Thomas feels the USSC needs to find a way to roll back that clock.

 

[RobGMN]

And Democrats want to molest kids and cut their own weenies off.

I thought most priests and preachers were Republicans. Not true?

“Our results provide support for theories arguing that people with stricter sexual attitudes are paradoxically more likely to engage in deviant sexual behavior.”

American Political-Party Affiliation as a Predictor of Usage of an Adultery Website - PubMed

The more politically conservative Americans are, the more restrictive their sexual attitudes are. A natural follow-up question is how this difference in attitudes relates to actual behavior. But self-reports of sexual behavior may be compromised by a social desirability bias that is influenced...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[ThxOne]

Who knows what he meant. I'd love to hear the reasoning behind why the gov't needs to get involved in contraception. And for the most part neo-conservatives seem to have accepted gay relationships and marriage, so I don't understand why Thomas feels the USSC needs to find a way to roll back that clock.

I don't think they need to be involved in sex education, contraception, decisions that should be made by parents... They need to get in line and do what they were voted into office to do. Dictating how Americans live is not that.

 

[ThxOne]

I thought most priests and preachers were Republicans. Not true?

Who knows, I am not a religious person.

 

[RobGMN]

I don't think they need to be involved in sex education, contraception, decisions that should be made by parents... They need to get in line and do what they were voted into office to do. Dictating how Americans live is not that.

Yes. We want the government to mind their business. That was why one state passed a regulation to try and stop the ACA. “we don’t want the government making decisions about our health and things medical.“

It’s backfired on them now that they want the government to make health and medical decisions for them regarding abortion.

 

[RobGMN]

Who knows, I am not a religious person.

Yet you adhere to religious dogma that says sex without conception is wrong.

Are you a pick-and-choose Catholic? Atheist? Agnostic?

 

[ThxOne]

Yet you adhere to religious dogma that says sex without conception is wrong.

Are you a pick-and-choose Catholic? Atheist? Agnostic?

Oh no you don't. Stop putting words in my mouth. I made statements, I did not give you my opinions. There is nothing wrong with sex for pleasure. That doesn't change biological FACTS that sex is for reproduction and anything other than that sexually is a perversion. Not necessarily a bad thing. You are too high strung and ready to argue that you don't take the time to view things objectively.

 

[RobGMN]

Oh no you don't. Stop putting words in my mouth. I made statements, I did not give you my opinions. There is nothing wrong with sex for pleasure. That doesn't change biological FACTS that sex is for reproduction and anything other than that sexually is a perversion. Not necessarily a bad thing. You are too high strung and ready to argue that you don't take the time to view things objectively.

Actually, you said sex for pleasure is a perversion.

“Another statement spun by you. I did not say sex is ONLY for reproduction. I said sex IS for reproduction. PERIOD. An undeniable fact.
If they can't reproduce then they have sex for pleasure. A perversion. Just like I said.”
“Perversion - sexual behavior or desire that is considered abnormal or unacceptable”

You insist it’s a perversion, which means “abnormal or unacceptable”, but then say you have no problem with it.
Why would you consider it abnormal or unacceptable behavior if you have no problem with it?

That’s fully contradictory.

 

[ThxOne]

Actually, you said sex for pleasure is a perversion.

“Another statement spun by you. I did not say sex is ONLY for reproduction. I said sex IS for reproduction. PERIOD. An undeniable fact.
If they can't reproduce then they have sex for pleasure. A perversion. Just like I said.”
“Perversion - sexual behavior or desire that is considered abnormal or unacceptable”

You insist it’s a perversion, which means “abnormal or unacceptable”, but then say you have no problem with it.
Why would you consider it abnormal or unacceptable behavior if you have no problem with it?

That’s fully contradictory.

Stop Rob, Just stop. Of course that is the definition you chose to use, because it allows you to keep arguing.

Use this one and shut up.

noun
noun: perversion; plural noun: perversions

1. 1.
   the alteration of something from its original course, meaning, or state to a distortion or corruption of what was first intended.

 

[RobGMN]

Stop Rob, Just stop. Of course that is the definition you chose to use, because it allows you to keep arguing.

Use this one and shut up.

noun
noun: perversion; plural noun: perversions

1. 1.
   the alteration of something from its original course, meaning, or state to a distortion or corruption of what was first intended.

Ohhhhh, you were using the non-sexual definition when discussing sexual activities.
That makes total sense.

No wonder you constantly whine that no one understands you. You speak a language all your own, that no one has the Rosetta Stone to decipher.

Cool. Yesterday I installed a concrete in my car. It really improved the torque from the spinners in the sprocket box.
Maybe it’s just because I listen to cryogenics.

So when you describe homosexuality as a perversion, you are saying that it’s OK with you, just like the “perversion” of not conceiving during sex.
So then why all the anti-homosexual rhetoric?

 

[Jimi77]

Yes. We want the government to mind their business. That was why one state passed a regulation to try and stop the ACA. “we don’t want the government making decisions about our health and things medical.“

It’s backfired on them now that they want the government to make health and medical decisions for them regarding abortion.

Nobody wants gov't until they want gov't. Keep your hands off my guns, but make sure women can't have abortions.