Winners only.

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You're doing it again Rob.

1. I didn't make any flat out statement about not liking anything - you just lied.
You have complained multiple times about having your bullshit called out. A complaint about something is a direct statement that you dislike or are negatively affected by something. We've already gone over this and I already provided proof for you. Do you need to see it again?

2. You do "choose to accept" facts. You choose the facts that align with your argument.
The facts remain unchanged whether I "choose to accept them" or not. You have made it clear that you think your choice to accept or deny changes a fact. You demonstrated this more than once. Your choice does NOT change the fact.
Show me a valid and confirmed/verified study that water is not H2O, but something else. If it's verifiable, I don;t get to "choose" to accept it or not, unlike you thinking you can "choose not to accept" the fact that bones have nerves in them, or that an average is a real number and can represent a genuine statistic.

3. You thinking you won some argument does not mean I fail at something. It means you're arrogant.
Do you consider being correct as a "win" and being wrong as a "loss"? I guess if there is a bet riding on it, you could be right. But this ain't a contest. It's a discussion, discourse, argument, conversation. Wrong is wrong, right is right. They just are. But declaring something as fact when it is not a fact is indeed a failure. It's a failure to be accurate.

4. Through not in. I am right you are an idiot.
Another case where you accept your feelings or opinions as fact, simply because you hold them. You have done this before. Many times in this forum, actually. Grow up a little and recognize that's not how it works.

5. I didn't say he sets them. I said many, many times he can affect them through his direct and indirect actions. You ignore these facts.
So when you talked about how gas immediately shot up when Biden was "inserted" in office, and all the complaints about how he didn't lower prices, and how Trump made the prices $1.50
/gallon while you delivered pizza, you were only talking metaphorically? When you did all the arguing about land leases and drilling (that you completely FUBARed all your facts on), you were just trying to focus blame on Biden?
You don't actually believe the POTUS sets gas prices? (not a rhetorical question)

6. Tell us more about the concept of gravity... this sounds intriguing.
Why bother? Just choose not to accept the facts and then go prove it.

BLAH BLAH BLAH!!! Rob, seriously, just stop. You are making a bunch of bullshit, ignorant statements again to try and win over readers. You are dodging the current topics and going way back again to distract people. Typical Rob. Stop telling lies and claiming people made statements they didn't make. Coward.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I disagree. He is making a definitive statement that Conservapubs as he called them are X. If he wasn't talking about all of them he would say some or most or the majority or minority.

Do you REALLY want to go down this path? I could probably find a dozen posts in seconds where you described a group of people singularly, fully disregarding that there is individuality amongst the group members. Like when you said all ***** are schizophrenic.

SO, decide now which way you want to be. None of the "Do as I say, but not as I do" shit.
Do you want to describe groups as a group, or do you think we should describe every group member individually?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Do you REALLY want to go down this path? I could probably find a dozen posts in seconds where you described a group of people singularly, fully disregarding that there is individuality amongst the group members. Like when you said all ***** are schizophrenic.

SO, decide now which way you want to be. None of the "Do as I say, but not as I do" shit.
Do you want to describe groups as a group, or do you think we should describe every group member individually?

Or you can pop that cock out of your mouth and clear it up.... all or some????

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

BLAH BLAH BLAH!!! Rob, seriously, just stop. You are making a bunch of bullshit, ignorant statements again to try and win over readers. You are dodging the current topics and going way back again to distract people. Typical Rob. Stop telling lies and claiming people made statements they didn't make. Coward.

Funny, because I responded to your post, POINT BY POINT.
Stop trying to blame me for your inability to handle it when you get trapped by your own inability to communicate and are backed into a corner over and over again.

Try harder and maybe you will fail less.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Funny, because I responded to your post, POINT BY POINT.
Stop trying to blame me for your inability to handle it when you get trapped by your own inability to communicate and are backed into a corner over and over again.

Try harder and maybe you will fail less.

You aren't trapping anyone. You are answering with ignorant comments and lies.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I disagree. He is making a definitive statement that Conservapubs as he called them are X. If he wasn't talking about all of them he would say some or most or the majority or minority.

Or if he was talking about all, he would have said all.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Or if he was talking about all, he would have said all.

Well if the clown would just clear it up we wouldn't have to speculate.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Or you can pop that cock out of your mouth and clear it up.... all or some????

I said "Conservapubs". I did not say "ALL Conservapubs".
Here's another mindbender for you "Cars run on gas". Is it true, or false?

"I don't live in the past. Like liberals." All, or some?
"Doesn't take much to get a liberal wound up." All, or some?
"LOL now I know why it is so easy for you liberals to accept it when gay people say it wasn't a choice, it just happened." All, or some?
Maybe this is the answer: "When I say you people, You, Liberals, lefties, Democrats... I am grouping all of you together."

So you take issue with me describing Conservapubs as a whole, but are Ok doing it yourself.
Ironic.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I said "Conservapubs". I did not say "ALL Conservapubs".
Here's another mindbender for you "Cars run on gas". Is it true, or false?

"I don't live in the past. Like liberals." All, or some?
"Doesn't take much to get a liberal wound up." All, or some?
"LOL now I know why it is so easy for you liberals to accept it when gay people say it wasn't a choice, it just happened." All, or some?
Maybe this is the answer: "When I say you people, You, Liberals, lefties, Democrats... I am grouping all of you together."

So you take issue with me describing Conservapubs as a whole, but are Ok doing it yourself.
Ironic.

See, I called it. You made sure it was the opposite of what I said. That would have been fine, I expected nothing less from you... but you being you we can always expect more huh Rob. Just can't not run your diick suckin mouth.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So I didn't say you said ALL, I said you meant all. Then you talk shit, then your last sentence you confirmed I was right, you meant all. What a clown.

'I did not say "ALL Conservapubs"

"So you take issue with me describing Conservapubs as a whole, but are Ok doing it yourself.
Ironic.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

See, I called it. You made sure it was the opposite of what I said. That would have been fine, I expected nothing less from you... but you being you we can always expect more huh Rob. Just can't not run your diick suckin mouth.

My words are my words. Did you want me to say that I did not intend to write what I wrote?
That might be a problem you run into when you are trying to keep up with a discussion. I do not have that problem.

It's common knowledge that when you speak of a group, there will be people that do not "fit the mould". It's scary to you, but it speaks to "averages". We say "humans have two arms, two legs, two hands, two feet, ten fingers, ten toes".
As an adult, do you think this means every single human has that? I would hope not. But considering how you lump every single liberal, every Democrat, every *****, etc. as one being, thinking they ALL must fit the mould, my hopes are probably misplaced.

So now I'll ask you why you were suddenly so concerned with my semantics, when I answered your post point-by-point. Was it an attempt (in your own words) to: make "a bunch of bullshit, ignorant statements again to try and win over readers." for the purpose of "dodging the current topics"?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

My words are my words. Did you want me to say that I did not intend to write what I wrote?
That me a problem you run into when you are trying to keep up with a discussion. I do not have that problem.

It's common knowledge that when you speak of a group, there will be people that do not "fit the mould". It's scary to you, but it speaks to "averages". We say "humans have two arms, two legs, two hands, two feet, ten fingers, ten toes".
As an adult, do you think this means every single human has that? I would hope not. But considering how you lump every single liberal, every Democrat, every *****, etc. as one being, thinking they ALL must fit the mould, my hopes are probably misplaced.

I know, that's how you claim you want to write on this forum. We should just decipher your post because you are lazy. Got it. A person who acts like he only wants to speak to facts want's to now act like common knowledge is his go to way of thinking. Convenient huh. You, a person who assumes and speaks for others now wants to try and school someone on common knowledge. You don't have that, or common sense, or a fully functioning pineal gland.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I know, that's how you claim you want to write on this forum. We should just decipher your post because you are lazy. Got it. A person who acts like he only wants to speak to facts want's to now act like common knowledge is his go to way of thinking. Convenient huh. You, a person who assumes and speaks for others now wants to try and school someone on common knowledge. You don't have that, or common sense, or a fully functioning pineal gland.

“Decipher”? Are you five years old?
When I say “cars use gas”, do you think I only mean cars, or could I mean trucks, SUVs, vans, etc? Do you think I mean there is no vehicle that does NOT use gas?
When you said gas was $1.86 under Trump, you meant for all of the US and for all four years, right?

Once again, you try to use semantics to prove yourself right. And once again you fail. Just like your stupid attempt to prove there are no nerves in bones.
It was something like “through bones, but not IN them. It’s a TUNNEL”. Moronic.

You’re not skilled enough to play that game, kid. Don’t bother trying.

 

[SlugButter]

You ignored everything I said and tossed in a falsehood on top of it.

Stay on task. Speak to why favoring facts, proof, and evidence over feelings, opinions, claims, beliefs is political elitism.
Speak to why Conservapubs are anti-education, anti-fact.

Go learn what asylum is.

I’m for wide open borders. You seem to be far more conservative than I am on almost every issue. This is why I just troll you instead of have an actual conversation. I don’t think you even know what a conservative is unless someone labeled it for you. You’re made to hate so easily that the actual issues themselves don’t really matter. You’ll just sway to whatever the big D says is liberal. You are actually arguing border policy as if arresting more people is a good thing, and Biden is better than Trump at it. Laughable. I will just come back In a few weeks to troll the thread again. No real conversation is happening here.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

“Decipher”? Are you five years old?
When I say “cars use gas”, do you think I only mean cars, or could I mean trucks, SUVs, vans, etc? Do you think I mean there is no vehicle that does NOT use gas?
When you said gas was $1.86 under Trump, you meant for all of the US and for all four years, right?

Once again, you try to use semantics to prove yourself right. And once again you fail. Just like your stupid attempt to prove there are no nerves in bones.
It was something like “through bones, but not IN them. It’s a TUNNEL”. Moronic.

You’re not skilled enough to play that game, kid. Don’t bother trying.

Once again you use examples OUT OF CONTEXT to argue with. Just stop, you're stupid.