Winners only.

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Maybe that's why you fail at so many arguments here: You think your personal decision to accept or not accept a fact somehow provides the necessary validation.

There in lies the problem, not with Thx, but with the whole system as it exists. We have one party that is clearly anti-science and has gone so far as to openly embrace conspiracy theories. OTOH, the other party denies simple reality and is caught up in their wokeism. Since neither party seems to interested in dealing with facts, there is no common ground to move forward.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

We should also take action against the businesses that employ illegals, as this encourages the problem.

Exactly. And open up economic ties with our neighbors to the south, so people have less incentive to leave their native countries in the first place. For some reason we won't work with the totalitarian and communist regimes in the western hemisphere, but we have no problem working with the China.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You are flat out saying you don't like being called on your bullshit and false info, but will continue to post it so that you can be called on it. That's weird.

I don't "choose to accept" facts. Do you think 2+2=4 because I "choose" to accept it as fact?

Maybe that's why you fail at so many arguments here: You think your personal decision to accept or not accept a fact somehow provides the necessary validation.
Is that why you argued for dozens of posts that bones have no nerves in them? Because you CHOOSE not to accept the fact that they do?
Is that why you argued for dozens of posts that Biden sets gas prices? Because you CHOOSE not to accept the fact that he doesn't?

Sorry kid, but your choice to accept or reject a fact doesn't change the fact in any way.
Choose to reject the fact that gravity exists and will cause you to hit the pavement at up to 120MPH when you jump off a building. We'll see if your choice has any effect when you splatter.

You're doing it again Rob.

1. I didn't make any flat out statement about not liking anything - you just lied.
2. You do "choose to accept" facts. You choose the facts that align with your argument.
3. You thinking you won some argument does not mean I fail at something. It means you're arrogant.
4. Through not in. I am right you are an idiot.
5. I didn't say he sets them. I said many, many times he can affect them through his direct and indirect actions. You ignore these facts.
6. Tell us more about the concept of gravity... this sounds intriguing.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

There in lies the problem, not with Thx, but with the whole system as it exists. We have one party that is clearly anti-science and has gone so far as to openly embrace conspiracy theories. OTOH, the other party denies simple reality and is caught up in their wokeism. Since neither party seems to interested in dealing with facts, there is no common ground to move forward.

Before you go too far. I am 100% about science. I have a degree in biology (a science) I excelled at science all through school. I also have common sense, the ability to ask WHY, HOW, WHAT.

I could give you a fact that this is GREEN. I could also give you the fact that this is GREEN. These are two facts. Which would you CHOOSE for your argument. Multiple facts exist for many things. Its use matters, its context matters. To ignore these things is ignorant and shows limited intelligence. i.e. RobGMN.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

50 Years Ago, Sugar Industry Quietly Paid Scientists To Point Blame At Fat

Documents show that in the '60s, the sugar industry funded Harvard researchers who, examining risk factors of heart disease, dismissed concerns about sugar and doubled down on the dangers of fat.

www.npr.org

What the Monsanto Papers tell us about corporate science | Corporate Europe Observatory

The Monsanto Papers are a trove of internal documents slowly released since March 2017 in a US lawsuit by cancer victims against Monsanto over its ubiquitous herbicide, Roundup. They tell a lot about how Monsanto actively subverts science, both in its practices and the way it abuses science’s...

corporateeurope.org

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

We should send Rob down to judge who is a “true asylum” seeker. Lol. They’re all asylum seekers genius, and most countries have no reciprocity. I see someone has the word salad down to appear they have a real opinion. .

You ignored everything I said and tossed in a falsehood on top of it.

Stay on task. Speak to why favoring facts, proof, and evidence over feelings, opinions, claims, beliefs is political elitism.
Speak to why Conservapubs are anti-education, anti-fact.

Go learn what asylum is.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You ignored everything I said and tossed in a falsehood on top of it.

Stay on task. Speak to why favoring facts, proof, and evidence over feelings, opinions, claims, beliefs is political elitism.
Speak to why Conservapubs are anti-education, anti-fact.

Go learn what asylum is.

Are you a grown man or not? If you are, speak like one.

Why make a statement that you know is not factual?

When you say "Conservapubs are anti-education, anti-fact" you are saying that ALL "Conservapubs are anti-education, anti-fact". This is impossible for you to know. You are assuming and are trying to pass off your assumption as fact.

Please be adult and factual when you speak to us.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Are you a grown man or not? If you are, speak like one.

Why make a statement that you know is not factual?

When you say "Conservapubs are anti-education, anti-fact" you are saying that ALL "Conservapubs are anti-education, anti-fact". This is impossible for you to know. You are assuming and are trying to pass off your assumption as fact.

Please be adult and factual when you speak to us.

When you say conservapubs are x, you said conservapubs are x. When you say ALL conservapubs are X, then you said ALL conservapubs are...

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

When you say conservapubs are x, you said conservapubs are x. When you say ALL conservapubs are X, then you said ALL conservapubs are...

I disagree. He is making a definitive statement that Conservapubs as he called them are X. If he wasn't talking about all of them he would say some or most or the majority or minority.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You're doing it again Rob.

1. I didn't make any flat out statement about not liking anything - you just lied.
You have complained multiple times about having your bullshit called out. A complaint about something is a direct statement that you dislike or are negatively affected by something. We've already gone over this and I already provided proof for you. Do you need to see it again?

2. You do "choose to accept" facts. You choose the facts that align with your argument.
The facts remain unchanged whether I "choose to accept them" or not. You have made it clear that you think your choice to accept or deny changes a fact. You demonstrated this more than once. Your choice does NOT change the fact.
Show me a valid and confirmed/verified study that water is not H2O, but something else. If it's verifiable, I don;t get to "choose" to accept it or not, unlike you thinking you can "choose not to accept" the fact that bones have nerves in them, or that an average is a real number and can represent a genuine statistic.

3. You thinking you won some argument does not mean I fail at something. It means you're arrogant.
Do you consider being correct as a "win" and being wrong as a "loss"? I guess if there is a bet riding on it, you could be right. But this ain't a contest. It's a discussion, discourse, argument, conversation. Wrong is wrong, right is right. They just are. But declaring something as fact when it is not a fact is indeed a failure. It's a failure to be accurate.

4. Through not in. I am right you are an idiot.
Another case where you accept your feelings or opinions as fact, simply because you hold them. You have done this before. Many times in this forum, actually. Grow up a little and recognize that's not how it works.

5. I didn't say he sets them. I said many, many times he can affect them through his direct and indirect actions. You ignore these facts.
So when you talked about how gas immediately shot up when Biden was "inserted" in office, and all the complaints about how he didn't lower prices, and how Trump made the prices $1.50
/gallon while you delivered pizza, you were only talking metaphorically? When you did all the arguing about land leases and drilling (that you completely FUBARed all your facts on), you were just trying to focus blame on Biden?
You don't actually believe the POTUS sets gas prices? (not a rhetorical question)

6. Tell us more about the concept of gravity... this sounds intriguing.
Why bother? Just choose not to accept the facts and then go prove it.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Or we could just have Rob the diick eater tell us what he meant. I am willing to state that because I am saying he meant ALL he will flip flop into opposition and say I am wrong.