I'll repost the quote of YOUR words: "Kyle was there to defend property. Why? Because Democrats defunded police."Wrong.
Police not being there is why he was there otherwise he would not need to be there. I gave you the reason the police weren't there in the numbers they should have been there with.
It's my post, I can say it means whatever I want. I don't care how much you want to be the forum police chief... you can't control other people or what they say or what they think. Don't get angry at others for your lack of brain power. You are not smart. You know you are not smart. That is why you argue on forums and only site facts. Things OTHER people have proven. That way, in your mind, you are never wrong and you finally get to appear smart. You're not. I have been in your head since last night directing your soft brain in the direction I wanted it to go. Proof that you are simple.I'll repost the quote of YOUR words: "Kyle was there to defend property. Why? Because Democrats defunded police."
Even IF you want to ignore your own words (which is pretty lame), and spin to "Police not being there is why he was there", that is not a valid reason for him to have gone. Nor does it explain how he knew the situation from a practical and tactical standpoint.
Who was feeding him info on what the police presence was, what it was supposed to be, and what he should do about it as a 17 y.o. Joe Citizen?
You continue to grasp at straws, even lying about your won words to hang on. Lame.
Here is the chain of events: You first said "Kyle was there to defend property. Why? Because Democrats defunded police." When called out on the inaccuracy, you tried to change it to: "Police not being there is why he was there otherwise he would not need to be there."
You either forgot what you originally posted, or you didn't even comprehend your own words. Now you try to spin, backpedal, and cover for it. And fail.
You don't think some teenagers know exactly what Kyle did and how much money he is going to get? Don't be naive. This case will be the benchmark whenever another teenager decides to play cop and kill people.
The guy with deodorant and underwear in a plastic bag was going to kill everybody. Really? Have you ever been in an argument and you or the other person says "I'll kill you mottherfukker?" That shitt happens all the time. Why didn't Rittenhouse call the police when Rosenbaum started threatening his life if he was so scared?
Sarcasm - Wait, so this guy got upset that Kyle was trying to keep people from looting and vandalizing property, threatened to kill Kyle, then chased after him???? How many times did people say these were "Peaceful Protestors"? Why would they threaten to kill someone for not letting them loot and vandalize?He confronted Rittenhouse 3 times. He told Rittenhouse he would kill him if he caught him alone. Then when caught Rittenhouse alone he charged him. I'm pretty sure he wasn't rushing over to thank him for trying to put out the fire they were starting.
Why would Rittenhouse call the police? What fantasy world do you live in? Does it take a lot drugs to get there? Do you believe that the police would have hunted down Rosenbaum in the middle of a riot, maybe charge him with verbal assault.
STFU.
June 7, 2020
A public pledge by nine of the 13 elected members of the Minneapolis City Council on June 7, 2020, to "defund police" garnered significant attention for the police abolition movement, as well as considerable political backlash.
I also posted a link right after that showing the cities that defunded their police before Aug 2020Doesn't mean the police were actually defunded by August. Technically, "they" have been talking about defund/abolish the police since the 60s.
TBH, it doesn't matter if the police were defunded, not defunded or even receiving excess Covid funds. The PD wasn't engaging rioters. It's hard to fault them: if they arrested, shot or detained a black man that would have only escalated the rioting. Why risk your life, career and potential murder charges if you don't have to???
Why didn't Rittenhouse protect them? Isn't that why he was there? I get it. He didn't protect any businesses and killed two people instead. That's pretty good security. No businesses saved and two people dead. One because of a plastic bag and one because of a skateboard. Now it makes perfect sense.
He hasn't watched any video, read testimony, or read a full article that wasn't biased...or he's so lost in "what if" land he needs a lifeline...And again you twist and distort what really happened - you are aware there is actual video of what happened and eyewitness testimony. One guy got killed because he threatened to kill Kyle if he caught him alone and then charged Kyle when he indeed caught him alone. Not only did he catch Kyle alone, but he caught Kyle trying to retreat from an armed protester.
The skateboard in question was clearly used as a deadly weapon, not only that another protesters attempted to stomp Kyle's face in while he was on the ground being pummeled by a deadly weapon (aka skateboard).
I also posted a link right after that showing the cities that defunded their police before Aug 2020
InterestingYeah found it. Here's an article specific Milwaukee.
![]()
Milwaukee Common Council adopts 2020 budget, leaves in place reduction in police force
Residents have pushed alderman to prioritize violence prevention and efforts on lead education.www.jsonline.com
He hasn't watched any video, read testimony, or read a full article that wasn't biased...or he's so lost in "what if" land he needs a lifeline...
Interesting![]()
My budget cut post was me getting in Rob's head. He made a statement that I couldn't so I did.I'm all about the facts. In this particular case I don't think it matters much; ie if Milwaukee had instead increased the police force by 60 officers, there still would have been a shyt show in Kenosha and Rittenhouse still may have felt compelled to play "boy cop."