You know what *****

[jco1385 5,000+ posts]

i know of a bunch of 'laws' that are incorrect //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

either way, it aint fact.

 

[UMWDawg92 10+ year member]

i know of a bunch of 'laws' that are incorrect //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
either way, it aint fact.

That would probably depend on who you ask... If you asked a physics professor or just about any scientist he would probably tell you yes it is fact because it can not be proven wrong. Science works in weird ways when it comes to how theories, laws, and facts are explained. So pretty much you're not wrong if you think it's not a fact but you're not wrong if you think it is either. Just depends on how you look at it and if you actually trust science

 

[SourDeez 10+ year member]

lol...ok so i guess you guys always read reviews before you purchase online....highly doubtful

this is a must.. I always research somethin when I'm dropping hundreds of dollars

I usually judge the quality of their web site.. One good thing to look for is if the company has an actual location in their contact section. If they don't have an address listed anywhere on their site, chances are they aren't really a legit business (either a scam, or someone who takes your order, orders it elsewhere cheaper and has them ship it straight to you)

I'll gladly pay an extra $20-$50 if the obviously legit website has them over a shady one.

 

[jco1385 5,000+ posts]

evolution is fact

religion is a money hungry, steal yo babies and PIITB scam

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/sneaky.gif.7189749b3a3f769e8815b47e8ae87f88.gif

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

Just depends on how you look at it and if you actually trust science

You are confusing science with religion. This is quite common, and leads to religious people claiming science is no better than religion because you have to have 'faith' in science too. That is 100% against what science is about. Science does not demand faith, it demands proof. You dont have to 'trust' science. If you dont trust it, you can go out and test it's accuracy. Science differentiates between what we can prove, and what we suspect. Religion merely says we must trust it.

 

[UMWDawg92 10+ year member]

You are confusing science with religion. This is quite common, and leads to religious people claiming science is no better than religion because you have to have 'faith' in science too. That is 100% against what science is about. Science does not demand faith, it demands proof. You dont have to 'trust' science. If you dont trust it, you can go out and test it's accuracy. Science differentiates between what we can prove, and what we suspect. Religion merely says we must trust it.

I'm not confusing the two but as you pointed out many people do so I'm saying they can look at it any way they want, there are many who even when presented with evidence they deny it and claim that it isn't correct. For those people there is no convincing them it is fact.

 

[UMWDawg92 10+ year member]

Okay genius, then Evolution is a law because there is no way to prove an alternative explanation. We may not know why it works but it wokrs and can be predicted accurately. If there was another explanation or series of equations that worked to predict evolution accurately then it would not be law.




Yea, that really worked well didn't it. :facepalm: It's a theory.

evolution is a theory because we are missing the evidence that would prove that it truly works how we think it does... Ever hear of the "missing link" that is the piece of evidence needed an actual transition stage from one primative species to a modern one

 

[UMWDawg92 10+ year member]

Incorrect. Ask any physics professor or jsut about any scientist and they would tell you that they don't know because it isn't understood yet.
Now, if you asked your high school science teacher, her would tell you it is a law because he's going to give you a forumla to use in order to get the write answer on the test he's going to give you later.

And you're right, it does depend on how you look at it. You can look at it the way you do, or you can look at it correctly.

and actually it was my college chemistry proffesor that said it is a law due to the fact there are no alternative ways to explain it accurately

 

[UMWDawg92 10+ year member]

The same is said for gravity. You're fighting yourself in this battle and still losing. lol
Ever hear of a scientific forumal that proves laws? It's the piece of evidence needed to prove a law and one does not exist for gravity.

Is that a dare? Because I'll accept it.

there are fromulas that accurately predict gravity... evolution can not be predicted yet. We don't exactly know how gravity works but we know it works and can predict it, thats why its a law. Evolution we don't know how it works and we don't have enough evidence to know that it works or can be predicted, why it is a theory.

 

[Dirtrider4eva 10+ year member]

there are fromulas that accurately predict gravity... evolution can not be predicted yet. We don't exactly know how gravity works but we know it works and can predict it, thats why its a law. Evolution we don't know how it works and we don't have enough evidence to know that it works or can be predicted, why it is a theory.

its too broad of a subject to be eliminated down to a pinpoint law (evolution) its a law that its there, but how it works is what we do not know.

how come as a ***** we have gills and a tail? but yet they dissapear before we are born? does that derrive a single ancestor at one point? saying we are linked to fish-like creature and tailed mammals? IFF (if and only if) we have a common ancestor, then why did thousands of thousands of different species emerge from the single line? and how come we still maintain these characteristics as a ***** (gills) even though we haven been considered mammals for thousands of years?

 

[UMWDawg92 10+ year member]

its too broad of a subject to be eliminated down to a pinpoint law (evolution) its a law that its there, but how it works is what we do not know.how come as a ***** we have gills and a tail? but yet they dissapear before we are born? does that derrive a single ancestor at one point? saying we are linked to fish-like creature and tailed mammals? IFF (if and only if) we have a common ancestor, then why did thousands of thousands of different species emerge from the single line? and how come we still maintain these characteristics as a ***** (gills) even though we haven been considered mammals for thousands of years?

that is why evolution is a theory and not a law

 

[Dirtrider4eva 10+ year member]

that is why evolution is a theory and not a law

the whole religion vs science fact.

half believe we are descendants of god and his holyness.

half believe we are on a evolutionary path. (my side but wont nuthug)

now, we can say, evolution is there.

Its the whole process of how it got there. theres evidence, but not enough for a stone-cold one way sentence to state how it works.

I myself love science. but if anyone knows how science people are, we will deny anything unless you have an explanation with evidence for everything supporting your claim