XXX Comps or Zapco C2K

i married them. we had multiple sexual encounters lasting only a few seconds each, but you can learn a lot when being that close with a set of speakers.
flat curves when dealing with woofers are mostly made up from box designs and the environment they are in. i had trouble with the note shifts and lack of range. more of a one note wonder, well two. it killed on the upper notes and lower notes, but lacked a lot of definition in between. once it found a note it was good, but it had a lot of trouble settling down into that note.
So, you are saying you own/owned a xxx sub, and that's the performance it gave you? if you are talking about a new one, I do not know, but I doubt it. If you mean the older version, nothing could be further from the truth. Within their playing range, my xxx's have hit every note Ive asked, and no trouble with transition even on the fastest rock beats. Much of the problems you describe could be attributed to the box.
"flat curves when dealing with woofers are mostly made up from box designs and the environment they are in."

I assume that is in response to my comment about a flat BL curve. If so, a speaker's BL curve has nothing to do with the enclosure its placed in. If that's not what you were referring to, I fail to see your point.

Lastly, you did not mention your experience with the xxx comp set you are critiquing. You must have forgot. I still would like to know.

 
a(n) is used used before vowels. xxx is not a SQ driver at all. where do you people get your info from? bettery yet, have you ever heard a SQ driver? if anything, in the right box it might be ok for a SQL type driver, but it wont compare to others such as the idmax, w6v2, d9, etc... shoot, my dd3512 will outperform that xxx SQ wise.
Actually, dumbass, he was right. You would use "an" because when "SQ" is pronounced, it begins with a vowel sound. (ess..)

Also, if you want to be a grammar Nazi, use correct punctuation and capitalization.

 
Actually, dumbass, he was right. You would use "an" because when "SQ" is pronounced, it begins with a vowel sound. (ess..)
Also, if you want to be a grammar Nazi, use correct punctuation and capitalization.
he said, "An XXX", ****face.

 
So, you are saying you own/owned a xxx sub, and that's the performance it gave you? if you are talking about a new one, I do not know, but I doubt it. If you mean the older version, nothing could be further from the truth. Within their playing range, my xxx's have hit every note Ive asked, and no trouble with transition even on the fastest rock beats. Much of the problems you describe could be attributed to the box.
"flat curves when dealing with woofers are mostly made up from box designs and the environment they are in."

I assume that is in response to my comment about a flat BL curve. If so, a speaker's BL curve has nothing to do with the enclosure its placed in. If that's not what you were referring to, I fail to see your point.

Lastly, you did not mention your experience with the xxx comp set you are critiquing. You must have forgot. I still would like to know.
i am wondering why i still visit this site. i was refering to frequency response in a real world installation which takes into account real world, non test lab factors.

 
i am wondering why i still visit this site. i was refering to frequency response in a real world installation which takes into account real world, non test lab factors.
Okay, so we've just established you have no idea what you are talking about, but want us to think you do. Again, a BL curve, while still telling alot about a speaker's performance, is NOT derived from an in-enclosure response. The more you want to downplay it as not a 'real world' spec, the more that tells me you dont even know what a BL curve is, means, or tells you about a speaker.

And, I find your ignorance defended by 'I go by real world setups, not math' as a terrible cliche. Seriously, was that the best you could come up with? Is it so hard to admit you dont know the topic at hand? Because, clearly you do not.

Lastly, now that you have avoided answering my question on the xxx comps, for the third time, and seem to refuse to elaborate on your xxx experience, Im forced to believe you have NO experience with them, and are merely talking out your ass. Wow, big surprise there. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

To be frank, this board could use a few less people like you, ignorant know-it-alls. Feel free to leave, you wont be missed.

 
arent you brave... i did, after four years because of children like you. i thought i would see if it has changed, but it hasnt.
After years of children like him? I assumed, from your experience and knowledge, or lack there of, that YOU were a kid.
What never changes is people's inability to admit when they are in over their head. You are in over your head in this convo, stop trying to look like the seasoned veteran. As someone who DOES have that experience, I see right through you. Sit down, shut up, and try reading more rather than typing so much. Maybe you'll actually learn something and eventually become that expert you seem to already think you are. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

 
After years of children like him? I assumed, from your experience and knowledge, or lack there of, that YOU were a kid.
What never changes is people's inability to admit when they are in over their head. You are in over your head in this convo, stop trying to look like the seasoned veteran. As someone who DOES have that experience, I see right through you. Sit down, shut up, and try reading more rather than typing so much. Maybe you'll actually learn something and eventually become that expert you seem to already think you are. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
seasoned veteran that has been here longer than you my child. the thing that is so funny about car audio is that it is simple. it isnt rocket science. if any of you could contribute less to porn subscriptions and more to the car audio industry you would realize that. the only math you need is simple ohms law, and how to calcuate box information. dont turn car audio into something it isnt. people like you give the car audio industry a bad reputation.

 
seasoned veteran that has been here longer than you my child. the thing that is so funny about car audio is that it is simple. it isnt rocket science. if any of you could contribute less to porn subscriptions and more to the car audio industry you would realize that. the only math you need is simple ohms law, and how to calcuate box information. dont turn car audio into something it isnt. people like you give the car audio industry a bad reputation.
why the hell do you keep saying that?

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Similar threads

Like OP stated, there are radios with higher power output. Most radios have around 18 watts RMS per channel. They mostly claim 50w per channel but...
18
4K
Im really glad I found this site, you've all taken time to help me out, much appreciated!!! I got a ported kicker brand box and 2 of those 12 sub...
9
1K
The install looks very nice and clean for sure. Thanks for sharing the pics as well as your experiences
3
1K

About this thread

MTXThunder9500

10+ year member
Fo Shizzle
Thread starter
MTXThunder9500
Joined
Location
Fargo, ND
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
58
Views
2,517
Last reply date
Last reply from
Gary S
Screenshot 2024-05-31 182935.png

Doxquzme

    Jun 15, 2024
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot 2024-05-31 182324.png

Doxquzme

    Jun 15, 2024
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top