Without further delay... 12 inch test session is OPEN

[lilmaniac2 5,000+ posts]

durabrand //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

 

[Electrodynamic 10+ year member]

durabrand //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

X2

 

[lilmaniac2 5,000+ posts]

also jim said the RL-p was the biggest disapointment to him and i must agree

 

[Beat_Dominator 5,000+ posts]

Yeah everyone was rooting for the RL-p to be a world beater... I was at least.

 

[Beat_Dominator 5,000+ posts]

Someone tell loyd to reply to my pm too //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

 

[Electrodynamic 10+ year member]

Someone tell loyd to reply to my pm too //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

Good luck on that. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/tongue.gif.6130eb82179565f6db8d26d6001dcd24.gif

 

[StupidDumbSlap 10+ year member]

Do you guys want a Boss Audio Klash to play with?? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/uhoh.gif.c07307dd22ee7e63e22fc8e9c614d1fd.gif From what I remember they hit pretty good //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/blackeye.gif.66a1670f5aaf7f406e783a63e3387dc5.gif.

 

[JimJ 5,000+ posts]

Yeah everyone was rooting for the RL-p to be a world beater... I was at least.

Eh, I had experience with a 15" prototype right before they switched to the aluminum cones...so I knew what to expect, or more accurately what not to expect //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[jeepintn 10+ year member]

cw12??????????

 

[GonnaGoPro]

nah, actually RLP is better than the W6.

if u see it got the loudest with the least watts. Also sq is subjective, you need to play like 100 plus tracks to really get to know a woofer. 10 won't cut it.

There needs to be a mixture of music on the sq test

rap, techno, classic, rock, clasic rock, heavy metal, ect.

also the rlp was tested is just one enclosure.

SO what i am saying, is I LOVE the results, but there are TOO many variables to decide what is a better driver. What you can figure out from this is FI paid loyd to jack up their subs,, jkn, nah, but rlp needs more credit, no doubt

peace

 

[JimJ 5,000+ posts]

nah, actually RLP is better than the W6.
if u see it got the loudest with the least watts. Also sq is subjective, you need to play like 100 plus tracks to really get to know a woofer. 10 won't cut it.

There needs to be a mixture of music on the sq test

rap, techno, classic, rock, clasic rock, heavy metal, ect.

also the rlp was tested is just one enclosure.

SO am i am saying, is I LOVE the results, but there A TOO many variables to decide what is a better drivers. What you can fugure out from this is what type of drivers they are

peace

Believe what you want...the part that's bolded is about the only part that has any validity.

I could say more, but it'd be pointless //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[GonnaGoPro]

true, but rlp did get the loudest with least watts In " ported spl"

and sq is subjective

= LOUD, efficient driver, SQ is subjective.

So dont say its dissappointing.

 

[JimJ 5,000+ posts]

true, but rlp did get the loudest with least watts In " ported spl"

And that has what to do with SQ again?

rap, techno, classic, rock, clasic rock, heavy metal, ect.

If you looked at the review, I included orchestral arrangements, rock, jazz, tracks which highlighted individual instrumental parts...how much more of a "mixture" do you need? I don't consider rap to be a valid test of a woofer's musicality, so it doesn't get included.

you need to play like 100 plus tracks to really get to know a woofer. 10 won't cut it.

I can see part of where you're coming from...you really get to know something after a period of time - which we didn't have any of during the session. Even Stereophile and The Absolute Sound have a short list of test material, maybe 10-15 tracks. If it's good enough for them, it's good enough for me.

but rlp needs more credit, no doubt

SPL-wise, the numbers speak for themselves. Musically, you're free to give it as much credit as you want - I'm just going from what my ears told me.

 

[GonnaGoPro]

And that has what to do with SQ again?


If you looked at the review, I included orchestral arrangements, rock, jazz, tracks which highlighted individual instrumental parts...how much more of a "mixture" do you need? I don't consider rap to be a valid test of a woofer's musicality, so it doesn't get included.

I can see part of where you're coming from...you really get to know something after a period of time - which we didn't have any of during the session. Even Stereophile and The Absolute Sound have a short list of test material, maybe 10-15 tracks. If it's good enough for them, it's good enough for me.

SPL-wise, the numbers speak for themselves. Musically, you're free to give it as much credit as you want - I'm just going from what my ears told me.

thanks for the revies though, you are the man, it must have been fun.

I would like to see peoples opinions on this

peace

 

[adio 5,000+ posts]

who's gonna say something about the mach5?