YOUR words, kid: “How can a person be both a video AND a source?”If anyone is calling Rand Paul a video... it would be you. Perhaps that is why you are so confused. Why do you keep engaging me then? Clearly your argument is with yourself. I suspect you do many, many things by yourself.
I never claimed a person was a video. You just couldn’t comprehend that a person can be source of info and a video can be a source of that sane info.
But now you’ll are hurt it five pages until everyone forgets you defended Rand Paul for saying what he actually said and going what he actually did.
Just like your whole defense of Trump, claiming it was only “alleged” he had top-secret documents even after he and his attorneys admitted it.
Just like (as Jimi pointed out) your “in doesn’t mean in” argument.
Just like all of your “it’s true because Thx said so” arguments.
It’s what you do. You try to spin, dance, and backpedal out of your mistakes and lack of knowledge.
Last edited:
