Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
“Clarifying after the fact”?

You couldn’t comprehend what I posted , then you accused me of posting something that I never did.

Clarify all you want. Start by clarifying why you defended Rand Paul with your admonition to me that his oration about “misinformation works” did not mean he actually did it.

The fact is, in his oratory he openly stated he did it.
Why did you try to spin away from that truth in several ways?
Enough spinning Rob. Just own what you said and stop with the spinning.
 
Enough spinning Rob. Just own what you said and stop with the spinning.
"Own what I said"?
More of your comprehension issues, I see.
I already "owned what I said"
1697339579297.png

So now YOU explain why you are lying about what I have said. Show us where I claimed Rand Paul is a video.
And then maybe explain this post where you tried to defend Rand Paul when he said ON VIDEO that he has used misinformation.
1697339877374.png
 
No offense, but why do you bother engaging him? It inevitably turns into 3 pages of a dispute over how some word is defined or that national average prices don't count, etc, etc, etc.
It's an interesting study in the psyche of sycophants.
It's also good practice for what I do for a living, TBH.
 
"Own what I said"?
More of your comprehension issues, I see.
I already "owned what I said"
View attachment 53904
So now YOU explain why you are lying about what I have said. Show us where I claimed Rand Paul is a video.
And then maybe explain this post where you tried to defend Rand Paul when he said ON VIDEO that he has used misinformation.
View attachment 53905
Not one time did I accuse you of saying Rand Paul is a video. You made two claims. That was not one of them. You are arguing again over something you misinterpreted from your lack of comprehension. There are reasons people don't advance their positions. I am sure you are clueless but your bosses probably laugh about it.
 
The source is the video taken of him saying it.
How is the source biased if HE is the source?

Stop trying to dance dance dance your way around your claim that the source is biased when Rand Paul IS the source.
If anyone is calling Rand Paul a video... it would be you. Perhaps that is why you are so confused. Why do you keep engaging me then? Clearly your argument is with yourself. I suspect you do many, many things by yourself.
 
No offense, but why do you bother engaging him? It inevitably turns into 3 pages of a dispute over how some word is defined or that national average prices don't count, etc, etc, etc.
It could be settled in 1 response but his ego gets in his way.

The National Average Gas Price is there to let people know how the price of oil is affecting the country as a whole. It is not to tell us what we are all paying at the pump.

Today's National Average via AAA - $3.601

I paid, just yesterday at Shell - $3.09
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,100,755
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_0710.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_0709.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top