Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Screenshot_20230810_153235_Brave.jpg


Maybe back that lie up as well...while you're at it...
 
Where's your proof that was his intent?
The recorded phone call with Brad.
intent - mental desire and will to act in a particular way, including wishing not to participate

If you want to deny intent, then you are saying he was not of sound mind and did not know why he was making the call to Brad.
That would not bode well for his future run for POTUS, and would call his prior acts as POTUS into question.

Do you think he knew what he was doing when he made the call, or that he was in an unfit state of mind?
 
Good then you should easily be able to provide actual facts to support your claim...
It's already done.
To produce (as in give to someone who requests) what does not exist, you must fabricate it. There is no other way you could produce it for them.

Can you reference any other way to produce something that has not formerly existed?




'
 
I can absolutely promise you every politician during election night at every level talks about finding more votes at some point without meaning fabrication...unless they're way up in the polls...

Kinda like someone saying I need to find more money...but I guess you'd assume their intent is to start counterfeiting...
 
It's already done.
To produce (as in give to someone who requests) what does not exist, you must fabricate it. There is no other way you could produce it for them.

Can you reference any other way to produce something that has not formerly existed?




'
Or it could a crude way to double check the votes were being counted correctly...

And you haven't provided any fact...you've provided your opinion...there's a big difference...
 
Last edited:
I can absolutely promise you every politician during election night at every level talks about finding more votes at some point without meaning fabrication...unless they're way up in the polls...

Kinda like someone saying I need to find more money...but I guess you'd assume their intent is to start counterfeiting...
Fair enough.
Produce the recordings of them calling up a Secretary of State on January 2nd and placing the order to either bring forth votes that are known to exist but were not cast/counted, or to fabricate votes that do not exist.

If a recording is not available, eyewitness testimony would be fine.
 
Fair enough.
Produce the recordings of them calling up a Secretary of State on January 2nd and placing the order to either bring forth votes that are known to exist but were not cast/counted, or to fabricate votes that do not exist.

If a recording is not available, eyewitness testimony would be fine.
Nope you made the claim Trump asked for fabricated ballots...shouldn't be difficult for a "facts only" guy like to show something beyond opinionated hearsay to support that claim...
 
Rob please explain how the Trump case is different from these examples.....

I see 150 examples that are fully legal.
Contesting a vote is a FAR cry from demanding someone produce a vote that was prevented from being cast or counted, or demanding they fabricate votes that do not exist.

Do you think it is illegal to contest a vote?

Just a few examples from the list.
Please point out which one broke a law, and tell us the law that was broken.

Then, please explain why you think it's legal for a POTUS to order someone to "find" votes that were either not counted but known to exist, or "find" votes that do not exist at all.
 
Last edited:
I see 150 examples that are fully legal.
Contesting a vote is a FAR cry from demanding someone produce a vote that was prevented from being cast or counted, or demanding they fabricate votes that do not exist.

Do you think it is illegal to contest a vote?

Just a few examples from the list.
Please point out which one broke a law, and tell us the law that was broken.

I see 150 examples of exactly the same thing they are trying to convict Trump of.... if we dig into each case individually with detail, i bet we would see very similar actions/intentions....if we can somehow predict Trumps intentions why cant we predict these
 
Last edited:
View attachment 51539

And I'm still waiting for you to prove this lie...
Already done.
There are no quotes around those words. Everyone knows it, and even djdillodon admitted it.
Why are you lying and insisting that is a quote?
Please explain.

After that, please explain why you tried to use this post to show us that the FDA approved Ivermectin for use in treating COVID.
If you want to play this game some more, I can just repost this lie attempt every single time you post here.
Is that what you're looking for?

1692116177456.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,093,105
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top