Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
So you still think it's a 1A right to shoot **** at school 🤔
It certainly could be. 1A is not just about "speech", as in "talking to someone".

It may seem crazy to you, but **** is protected by the 1A in the same way that other activities that might happen in that same classroom could be. As far apart as they may seem, a Bible reading and filming an adult act fall under similar protections.
The law and the COTUS work like that.
 
Last edited:
Bwwwaaaaahahahahhaha!!!!! It's too bad Big Orange got caught trying to keep the documents after they knew they were in his possession. What a maroon.

Yeah, no punishment for Hillary for her email server or anyone else for their classified data. Idk why you’re so happy when this is destroying the rule of law in our nation. What about all the money the Bidens have made doing pay for play? Joe admitted to a quid pro quo in Ukraine on TV and he’s president…what are you so happy about?
 
so now im really confused, is he claiming that teachers shagging at school and posting it on onlyfans is a constitutional right?
It very well could be, when it comes down to the First Amendment-protected right of free speeh.

Who in the world would have believed it was OK to burn a US flag until the SCOTUS confirmed it was? As a kid, I thought you would be jailed for letting the flag touch the GROUND.
Prior to my childhood, kids were kicked out of school for not SALUTING the flag (it was against their religion). Then the SCOTUS said "You can't kick them out for that".
 
Last edited:
It very well could be, when it comes down to the First Amendment-protected right of free speeh.

Who in the world would have believed it was OK to burn a US flag until the SCOTUS confirmed it was? As a kid, I thought you would be jailed for letting the flag touch the GROUND.
Prior to my childhood, kids were kicked out of school for not SALUTING the flag (it was against their religion). Then the SCOTUS said "You can't kick them out for that".
Now you're conflating saluting the flag with fcking on film for money on school property 🤔
 
Yeah, no punishment for Hillary for her email server or anyone else for their classified data. Idk why you’re so happy when this is destroying the rule of law in our nation. What about all the money the Bidens have made doing pay for play? Joe admitted to a quid pro quo in Ukraine on TV and he’s president…what are you so happy about?
Apples vs. oranges, perhaps?
Were there actual charges they could have indicted Hilary with? If so, why didn't they? And who are the "they" that would have failed to do it?
Wouldn't failure to do that be aiding and abetting in the destruction of our country?
 
Last edited:
Now you're conflating saluting the flag with fcking on film for money on school property 🤔
Stop using the word "conflating" incorrectly.

They are obviously very different acts.
So are abortion, and a caucasian marrying an Afro-American. But (hold your hat): TEHY ARE BOTH PROTECTED BY THE SAME 14TH AMENDMENT.

CRAZY how that works, huh?
 
Stop using the word "conflating" incorrectly.

They are obviously very different acts.
So are abortion, and a caucasian marrying an Afro-American. But (hold your hat): TEHY ARE BOTH PROTECTED BY THE SAME 14TH AMENDMENT.

CRAZY how that works, huh?
I'll say conflating in any way I want...that is a 1a right...getting content for your OF at school isn't...except in your mind 🤣🤣🤣
 
Yeah, no punishment for Hillary for her email server or anyone else for their classified data. Idk why you’re so happy when this is destroying the rule of law in our nation. What about all the money the Bidens have made doing pay for play? Joe admitted to a quid pro quo in Ukraine on TV and he’s president…what are you so happy about?
See my previous posts about my opinion on handling classified data. I'm for nailing all these bastards and quite perplexed that classified docs are handled so loosely at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, so yes I'm thrilled. I'm not sure how this destroys the "rule of law in our nation." As a person whose held a Top Secret clearance in the Marines and Classified at DHS, I can guarantee you they would have hung me by my balls if they found out I had a treasure trove of classified docs in the trunk of my car or in an unsecured closet. Are you not happy to see that one of these A-holes is finally being held accountable? I know I am.

Unfortunately for Trump, once he was caught, rather than cooperate, he decided to cover up his crime and often times the cover up is worse than crime itself. IIRC, Hillary was moving her private mail server around, so the same (a cover up) may apply to her as well. Were you not a supporter of the "Jail Hillary" movement back in 2016? If so, then what's changed your mind when it comes to Trump? Should Trump be held to the same standard he (sort of) applied Hillary Clinton or are you saying Trump deserves a pass because "he" gave Hillary one?
 
Apples vs. oranges, perhaps?
Were there actual charges they could have indicted Hilary with? If so, why didn't they? And who are the "they" that would have failed to do it?
Wouldn't failure to do that be aiding and abetting in the destruction of our country?
IIRC, the FBI/DOJ said her actions didn't rise to the level of criminality. In the case of Trump, I think it's the lack of cooperation that separates him from Biden, Pence, Obama and who knows who else that removes classified docs from the WH.
 
IIRC, the FBI/DOJ said her actions didn't rise to the level of criminality. In the case of Trump, I think it's the lack of cooperation that separates him from Biden, Pence, Obama and who knows who else that removes classified docs from the WH.
Nah, it’s corruption. Deep state protecting their politicians. Has nothing to criminal behavior; has everything to do with crushing a political movement and keeping some of the most evil politicians in power.
 
It very well could be, when it comes down to the First Amendment-protected right of free speeh.

Who in the world would have believed it was OK to burn a US flag until the SCOTUS confirmed it was? As a kid, I thought you would be jailed for letting the flag touch the GROUND.
Prior to my childhood, kids were kicked out of school for not SALUTING the flag (it was against their religion). Then the SCOTUS said "You can't kick them out for that".

Our justice system is such an abused whore that literally ANYTHING can be brought up in it. . . .

But I would actually be extremely surprised in you if you actually feel that Adults fuccin for profit in a place where children are educated should even be defended

at that point, we may as well bring back slavery and throw every other law out the book and just say EVERYTHING is free speech and self expression
 
Last edited:
Nah, it’s corruption. Deep state protecting their politicians. Has nothing to criminal behavior; has everything to do with crushing a political movement and keeping some of the most evil politicians in power.
Yes Biden is under investigation for 5 mill bribery as vp so file suite on trump. As for the docs trump had was operation crossfire hurricane which was doj Obama and hillary spying on his campaign. Which trump had a law suite on spying with Hillary which was dismissed weeks after his raid. Idk
 
Our justice system is such an abused whore that literally ANYTHING can be brought up in it. . . .

But I would actually be extremely surprised in you if you actually feel that Adults fuccin for profit in a place where children are educated should even be defended

at that point, we may as well bring back slavery and throw every other law out the book and just say EVERYTHING is free speech and self expression
I'm not defending the action, I am saying it may very well be legally protected.
I am a big advocate of consistency, especially when it comes to laws, protection of rights, etc. My father was VERY against the whole "Do as I SAY, not as I DO" mantra that a lot of people lived by. He was a fair man, and would never expect someone to do something that he himself would not do. I operate the same way.

IF this action by the couple falls under the guidelines of free speech, then it is free speech whether people like the "speech" or not. Legally, no different than flipping off that cop who gave you a ticket. The cop may not like the "speech", but there is nothing they can legally do about your expression. We may not like someone openly carrying an AR-15 in a WalMart, but if it is a protected right and being done legally, then we can't do a thing about it.

Like the earlier analogies I have made, the laws should be applied consistently or they really have no value at all.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,097,931
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
20260423_214720.jpg

BP1Fanatic

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
20260419_124349.jpg

BP1Fanatic

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top