Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
sorry was rushing and bourbon was good.
Never seen the video? After they stop counting (all the states) and she stayed behind with no supervision. On video show her running ballots and re running the same batch multiple times. There’s another videos showed her and her mother sliding her thumb drive during the counting ballots earlier that day.
That's not what the article claims nor are then links to these accusations and videos. Looks like whoever made these claims is getting sued for defamation. Assuming this is like the rest of the "stolen election" claims, I assume gateway pundit will be coughing up some ca$h.

 
What kills me is how there are so many people who think that elections absolutely cannot be tampered with and that all presidential elections are always legit. It's no coincidence that most of these people are the ones who claim to be on the winning party either. Just ignore the:

Shady politicians
The fact that most news sources are biased, sometimes heavily
Censoring
The constant misdirection
 
What kills me is how there are so many people who think that elections absolutely cannot be tampered with and that all presidential elections are always legit. It's no coincidence that most of these people are the ones who claim to be on the winning party either. Just ignore the:

Shady politicians
The fact that most news sources are biased, sometimes heavily
Censoring
The constant misdirection
Or just ignore the fact that elections are monitored in a bipartisan fashion and "the losers" have yet to turn up a shred of evidence.
 
Last edited:
Right... cause people can't be bought. I love how you all say stuff like "a shred of evidence". There is plenty but why would any of the "winners" accept the evidence?
I'll accept the evidence, just present it. The problem is (as always) it's not evidence, it's conspiracy theories. And it's not a matter of the "winners" accepting the evidence, it's a matter of the courts continually rejecting these cases for lack of evidence and often times censuring or suspending licenses of the attorneys who bring these cases because they are so devoid of evidence.
 
I'll accept the evidence, just present it. The problem is (as always) it's not evidence, it's conspiracy theories. And it's not a matter of the "winners" accepting the evidence, it's a matter of the courts continually rejecting these cases for lack of evidence and often times censuring or suspending licenses of the attorneys who bring these cases because they are so devoid of evidence.
Which tells you that the courts have been compromised.
 
What kills me is how there are so many people who think that elections absolutely cannot be tampered with and that all presidential elections are always legit. It's no coincidence that most of these people are the ones who claim to be on the winning party either. Just ignore the:

Shady politicians
The fact that most news sources are biased, sometimes heavily
Censoring
The constant misdirection
And the lizard people hide it so well, no one can figure it out. Not even the POTUS, with his untold billions and unlimited power.

Funny, that.
 
Last edited:
Everyone worried that AI will ruin the world.
I think it’s more likely that pieces of **** like this will be our downfall.

F11C185C-56E8-4A6A-B15E-2D354D5CEF28.jpeg
 
And the lizard people hide it so well, no one can figure it out. Not even the POTUS, with his untold billions and unlimited power.

Funny, that.
How are you so open minded to and accepting of anything that questions the legitimacy of a thing being a "conspiracy theory" but are so absolutely closed minded to the criminal nature of humans and the greed that goes along with it in getting something no matter what it takes even when it is done right in front of everyone. You, a person who claims to work finding fraud, the very thing I am talking about, are willing to make money from it but turn a blind eye to it when it is something you want. You are part of the problem Gramps.
 
Which tells you that the courts have been compromised.
LOL with all the judges Trump appointed. I hear Dubya appointed a judge or two in his time. We'll just ignore that these courts were often in red states. And so the conspiracy lives on (and on and on and on). The FBI is working for the DNC, the courts are compromised, the schools, the corporations, the media, the tech sector, et al are nothing more than tentacles of the DNC.

This is what happens when you work backwards from a predetermined conclusion and then backfill and make up what ever facts fit that narrative. You end up with a conspiracy theory and concocting craziness to fit the narrative. It's kinda like when the left works backwards from what they think educational outcomes should be and conclude that tests are racist, because that fits the narrative. Whether it's coming from the left or the right, it's always good for a chuckle.
 
LOL with all the judges Trump appointed. I hear Dubya appointed a judge or two in his time. We'll just ignore that these courts were often in red states. And so the conspiracy lives on (and on and on and on). The FBI is working for the DNC, the courts are compromised, the schools, the corporations, the media, the tech sector, et al are nothing more than tentacles of the DNC.

This is what happens when you work backwards from a predetermined conclusion and then backfill and make up what ever facts fit that narrative. You end up with a conspiracy theory and concocting craziness to fit the narrative. It's kinda like when the left works backwards from what they think educational outcomes should be and conclude that tests are racist, because that fits the narrative. Whether it's coming from the left or the right, it's always good for a chuckle.
All these things have one thing in common. They are all human and as such are susceptible to greed.
 
I was so wrong. So I've been saying that transgender athletes can, could, should compete in an open division. Apparently that was an option for Lesley Mumford and Mumford chose to compete in the women's division, crushing the competition by 17 minutes. So much for my theory that former males could compete in some sort of open/genderless division.

OTOH, my kiddo got to be a ball boy (biological, cisgender, binary ball boy) at a professional women's soccer game last night between two women's teams comprised exclusively of biological women. Go XX chromosome.

 
Last edited:
I was so wrong. So I've been saying that transgender athletes can, could, should compete in an open division. Apparently that was an option for Lesley Mumford and Mumford chose to compete in the women's division, crushing the competition by 17 minutes. So much for my theory that former males could compete in some sort of open/genderless division.

Must be in his DNA to be the dominant sex. Looks like even when you chop it off your male dominance doesn't go away. Yay!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
969,544
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
561786595_18427607485102160_7010259965928918509_n.jpg

just call me KeV

    Oct 9, 2025
  • 0
  • 0
561583216_18427455586102160_8141545757991593433_n.jpg

just call me KeV

    Oct 9, 2025
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top