Winners only.

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I didn’t realize I would have to put Trumps name in every post so you wouldn’t forget the larger context of the posts.
Given the number of times you’ve complained about context, I’m surprised you need to be reminded of the general topic being discussed.

There was nothing to forget. You and I had engaged in our own discussion about ****. You asked me questions and I answered them. Tell me how you asking what I would do or what I think about women and **** has anything to do with Trump. I will help you, it has nothing to do with Trump.

My understanding is quite good. Let’s ask if anyone else forgot that the discussion of **** was reignited with the decision reached in the hearing where he was accused of ****.

Why would I ask anyone. Again, you and I started our own conversation about **** and you asked me questions.

DID ANYONE ELSE THINK THAT THE ONGOING DISCUSSION OF **** AND JURY TRISLS REGARDING **** WAS NOT ABOUT TRUMP?

Why are you asking them? Ask me. It was you and I talking about my opinions about ****. My opinions on **** have nothing to do with Trump. What is confusing you? That I gave you my opinions or that I could not care less about Trump?

Actually, I called all of the “news” networks infotainment simply because they have to fill 24hours a day and generate income from advertising.
When the report on non-news (and they all do), they are infotainment.

What “all sorts of” opinions have I expressed about the Trump hearing?

Everything you have posted that has your opinions in it. Do you not know what you post?

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

But where would the cartels get the guns to sell to us???

Where do Mexican drug cartels get their guns? Often, the United States

A Washington man tried to sneak an arsenal across the border into a Mexican cartel war zone. His arrest is part of a crackdown by Homeland Security.

www.usatoday.com

https://www.cnn.com/2013/08/27/world/americas/operation-fast-and-furious-fast-facts/index.html

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

You can make them harder to get LEGALLY...but people who do mass shootings are determined and there will always be someone on the street selling illegal guns...

But if we drive up the cost of guns, then they'll cost more legal or illegal. What this really comes down to is no matter what the cost, the "gun rights" club will not tolerate any sort of restriction on their access to firearms or any sort of regulation once they do have them (such as registration and licensing).
Why do we make drugs hard if not impossible to get LEGALLY? Addicts are determined and there will always be somebody on the street selling illegally. As a matter of fact why is anything illegal or regulated?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

We can’t even see the data on how many mass shooters were on mood meds. It’s a medical privacy concern. The mass shootings line up pretty closely with the rise of SSRIs being used to treat mood disorders. Mass shootings prior to the 90s had fairly obvious motives. Love triangle, student kills a teacher he doesn’t like, teachers killing each other at school over romance drama. It happened even back in the 1800s and will always happen with human beings interacting with each other. The cold calculated mass shootings we have today are not crimes of passion or a fit of anger at an authority figure. They are serial killer in nature. The actions of a psychopath from people who aren’t actually psychopaths sounds like an MK ultra type effect. Conspiracy theories aside.

They're not serial killer at all, they're something else entirely. I'd say they are psychopaths (a person affected by chronic mental disorder with abnormal or violent social behavior) or maybe more accurately they are a person who suffered a psychotic break. Where schools are involved there has been a ~20-30 year trend in defunding special ed, so those kids are forced into "gen pop" so perhaps that's were some of the school shootings come from. Perhaps the rise of SSRI can also be tracked back to this trend of defunding Special Ed and replacing SE with pills.

All that said, I still wonder why there is such resistance to any sort of regulation, such as licensing and registration. How ineffective are red laws going to be if we don't know who actually has guns? Killers are going to kill so we're going to make no effort to stop them because we can arm the entire population instead?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

The border patrol has chaplains for the immigrants coming across the border, since most of them are Catholic. Maybe get on Twitter and float the idea of taking away the immigrants chaplains because of the taxes. Let’s see how much support this idea gets.

I'm all for it. There are plenty of Catholic churches once the cross the boarder.

I do wonder what these "quasi-legal" immigrants think when they land in town like Denver (Portland, San Fran, etc) and see we have homeless everywhere.

 

[SlugButter]

They're not serial killer at all, they're something else entirely. I'd say they are psychopaths (a person affected by chronic mental disorder with abnormal or violent social behavior) or maybe more accurately they are a person who suffered a psychotic break. Where schools are involved there has been a ~20-30 year trend in defunding special ed, so those kids are forced into "gen pop" so perhaps that's were some of the school shootings come from. Perhaps the rise of SSRI can also be tracked back to this trend of defunding Special Ed and replacing SE with pills.

All that said, I still wonder why there is such resistance to any sort of regulation, such as licensing and registration. How ineffective are red laws going to be if we don't know who actually has guns? Killers are going to kill so we're going to make no effort to stop them because we can arm the entire population instead?

No one with common sense is saying we shouldn’t have regulations. I think we should, even though I think it’s a losing fight. It’s a luke warm solution to a hot problem. The supply of guns isn’t going to be stopped even with a whole ban of guns unfortunately. I suppose we have to try still. If we ban guns, a factory in China will immediately start manufacturing them at a rate of thousands per day, which will then be transported to a port in Mexico where the cartels run the local government. Those guns will then fill the black market, just like fentanyl. Since the same party pushing to take guns won’t also close the border, the problem will get worse actually. Access to illegal guns will get easier. It doesn’t seem like the life in prison regulation is even working. I have 0 faith in this incompetent government to get something like this done even if it was possible.

 

[SlugButter]

I'm all for it. There are plenty of Catholic churches once the cross the boarder.

I do wonder what these "quasi-legal" immigrants think when they land in town like Denver (Portland, San Fran, etc) and see we have homeless everywhere.

I’m just not for shaping the minds of people. If people want chaplains I wouldn’t stand in the way of it. And I don’t want to hear the tax money BS. We literally give 10x more money to local crack wh0res to have babies than we do to provide people with a chaplain. It’s called being humane in my opinion. I think we should feed the crack wh0res baby and provide chaplains. I used to be antireligious also, but as I grow older it just seems arrogant to think I can decide what another person is better off believing. Fvck it. Let’s have a religious class in public school that teaches about every religion and has open discussions about spirituality. We should go the opposite direction that politicians want us to go.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

But if we drive up the cost of guns, then they'll cost more legal or illegal. What this really comes down to is no matter what the cost, the "gun rights" club will not tolerate any sort of restriction on their access to firearms or any sort of regulation once they do have them (such as registration and licensing).
Why do we make drugs hard if not impossible to get LEGALLY? Addicts are determined and there will always be somebody on the street selling illegally. As a matter of fact why is anything illegal or regulated?

Drugs are being decriminalization at a rapid rate in major cities...

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

There was nothing to forget. You and I had engaged in our own discussion about ****. You asked me questions and I answered them. Tell me how you asking what I would do or what I think about women and **** has anything to do with Trump. I will help you, it has nothing to do with Trump.

Yes. Pure coincidence. Trump awarded $5million by a jury in a case involving him and a **** accusation. Then “we” just have a discussion out of the blue about ****, court cases regarding ****, jury decisions in those court cases.
Nothing at all to do with Trump.

Why would I ask anyone. Again, you and I started our own conversation about **** and you asked me questions.

I checked my PMs and there are no messages from you in there. We did not have “our own conversation”. Anything said was in this public thread which is a conversation between any and all parties who participate.

Why are you asking them? Ask me. It was you and I talking about my opinions about ****. My opinions on **** have nothing to do with Trump. What is confusing you? That I gave you my opinions or that I could not care less about Trump?

OK. You just felt out of the blue like having a chat about **** and how juries work in a **** trial. NOTHING to do with the headlines about him that were posted immediately before you had the idea to discuss your feelings about it.
And when you said he didn’t do it, you weren’t talking about Trump.
Got it.

Everything you have posted that has your opinions in it. Do you not know what you post?

So when I post a Federal regulation, that is my “opinion”?
When I post economic stats, they are my “opinion”?
When I post data from a medical textbook…”opinion”?
Gas price history? Also “opinion”?

Do you actually know what opinion means? Your post suggests you don’t.

 

[SlugButter]

Most people like to talk about a court case where Trump told an uptight liberal that her pvssy like old shrimp, so she sued him in a kangaroo court. Then we wonder why the actual issues won’t get taken care of.

 

[SlugButter]

Imagine a **** case where the defendant doesn’t even have to appear without a warrant being issued for failure to appear. These idiots in New York can’t even get criminal misdemeanor for failure to appear in a **** case, yet somehow it’s a legitimate case. That’s about as LOL as it can get.

 

[SlugButter]

It would be great if we were all female white liberals who could lightly stroke the taint spot of the local DA to get anyone we wanted convicted of ****. There are a whole lot of black men who have spent prison time for fvcking a progressive white female only for her to claim it was **** when she got caught cheating on her white privileged husband. Liberal women are the dumbest fvcks on planet earth and always have been.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Most people like to talk about a court case where Trump told an uptight liberal that her pvssy like old shrimp, so she sued him in a kangaroo court. Then we wonder why the actual issues won’t get taken care of.

How could he tell her anything? He had no idea who she was even after he sued him. Yet he also said she was not his type. Then he confused her for one of his ex-wives.

Kangaroo court?

 

[SlugButter]

How could he tell her anything? He had no idea who she was even after he sued him. Yet he also said she was not his type. Then he confused her for one of his ex-wives.

Kangaroo court?

I’m sure he was a vulgar dick. Usually when someone doesn’t show up to a legitimate court case there is a bench warrant put out and he is arrested. It’s called a failure to appear, which Im sure you know. If there was a shred of evidence that a male ***** a female, why is that warrant not already filed?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Imagine a **** case where the defendant doesn’t even have to appear without a warrant being issued for failure to appear. These idiots in New York can’t even get criminal misdemeanor for failure to appear in a **** case, yet somehow it’s a legitimate case. That’s about as LOL as it can get.

He wasn't being called as a witness. He was not legally required to be at the hearing.
It may have been a dumb move for him to choose not to testify, but it may also have been the best move given his penchant for fvcking up his public speaking.