Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
You don't have the mental capacity to even try to "get in my head", kid. I can tell every time I get in YOUR head though: You immediately start talking about homosexual activity, or guy's butts or reproductive organs. It's your go-to when you have nothing to fight back with. And you do it all the time.

I can run circles around you in any discussion about any topic, except maybe for delivering pizza or having to have a caretaker/being unable to live on my own.
'Never dealt with either of those as an adult.
See. In your head.
 
Answer the question instead of deflecting: Do you want your words to be taken literally, or do you want them interpreted to find out "what you mean"?
Answer the question without being YOU: Can you comprehend anything? I am not asking if you know what the definition is, I am asking if you CAN comprehend. It doesn't seem like you can. The philosophy isn't "when all else fails, take EVERYTHING literally".

I thought I made it clear already but apparently you have cataracts. I said comprehension is knowing when or when not to take things literally. You did read that didn't you? Did you not comprehend it?
 
Answer the question without being YOU: Can you comprehend anything? I am not asking if you know what the definition is, I am asking if you CAN comprehend. It doesn't seem like you can. The philosophy isn't "when all else fails, take EVERYTHING literally".

I thought I made it clear already but apparently you have cataracts. I said comprehension is knowing when or when not to take things literally. You did read that didn't you? Did you not comprehend it?
I can comprehend plenty. And I retain it. And I can use it in the future.
I comprehend when you complain that your words are taken literally.
I comprehend when you complain that your words are not taken literally.

I use those two situations to point out that you contradict your own complaints. This suggests you: A) Do not know how you want your words to be read B) Do not comprehend your own thoughts enough to put them into words here.
So, which is it? Do you want to be taken literally, or do you want the reader to figure out "what you mean" when your words are ambiguous?

For example: Your complaint that Biden didn't reduce the deficit. It was then proved he DID, so you changed your complaint to "he reduced it but it's still RISING".
Did you want us to take your complaint literally, or figure out "what you mean" so that the complaint wouldn't be based on a false premise?
 
Last edited:
I can comprehend plenty. And I retain it. And I can use it in the future.
I comprehend when you complain that your words are taken literally.
I comprehend when you complain that your words are not taken literally.

I use those two situations to point out that you contradict your own complaints. This suggests you: A) Do not know how you want your words to be read B) Do not comprehend your own thoughts enough to put them into words here.
So, which is it? Do you want to be taken literally, or do you want the reader to figure out "what you mean" when your words are ambiguous?

For example: Your complaint that Biden didn't reduce the deficit. It was then proved he DID, so you changed your complaint to "he reduced it but it's still RISING".
Did you want us to take your complaint literally, or figure out "what you mean" so that the complaint wouldn't be based on a false premise?
So by ignoring my question or refusing to read my post to give an answer and by your post yet again asking what I want you to do you clearly are going to ignore the comprehension part.

I am not going to do the work for you Rob. It says YOU NEED TO KNOW WHEN TO TAKE THINGS LITERALLY. Clearly you are not capable. Take care son.
 
42043
 
Faster but not higher... retard. Gee, which is worse, the speed or the amount. Which is relevant, now or then. You're just stupid.
Trump raised it higher than ever in history, and raised it faster than Biden has.
Trump bumped it up 33% in his four years.
Biden is at 5.6% so far. We'll see what the future holds.

A faster increase in debt means something, just like a faster increase in pay means something.
One is good, the other is not.
Do you know which one is which?
 
Trump raised it higher than ever in history, and raised it faster than Biden has.
Trump bumped it up 33% in his four years.
Biden is at 5.6% so far. We'll see what the future holds.

A faster increase in debt means something, just like a faster increase in pay means something.
One is good, the other is not.
Do you know which one is which?
Knock it off. Trump isn't in office and Biden has caused more debt. Discussion over.
 
Knock it off. Trump isn't in office and Biden has caused more debt. Discussion over.
Hahahaha. Says the self-proclaimed genius.

We saw the 3rd largest increase in history under Trump. A $7.9 Trillion jump.
It's gone up approximately $2 Trillion under Biden. If this pace keeps up, he'll have less of an increase than Trump.
That is better.

If you're going to argue that he (Biden) should have stopped it altogether or reversed it, then you're a gullible dumbass who probably believed Trump when he said he would erase the debt in 8 years. Then immediately it increased...
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,118,625
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top