I can comprehend plenty. And I retain it. And I can use it in the future.
I comprehend when you complain that your words are taken literally.
I comprehend when you complain that your words are not taken literally.
I use those two situations to point out that you contradict your own complaints. This suggests you: A) Do not know how you want your words to be read B) Do not comprehend your own thoughts enough to put them into words here.
So, which is it? Do you want to be taken literally, or do you want the reader to figure out "what you mean" when your words are ambiguous?
For example: Your complaint that Biden didn't reduce the deficit. It was then proved he DID, so you changed your complaint to "he reduced it but it's still RISING".
Did you want us to take your complaint literally, or figure out "what you mean" so that the complaint wouldn't be based on a false premise?