Winners only.

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Fauci has stated that several times prior to covid

I can only find one instance. Is it possible he's changed his mind? I don't see where he's ever recanted the statement.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I hate to burst your bubble. You can take any aged kid to an R - rated movie. Legally

Make it an NC-17 movie....

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Make it an NC-17 movie....

There ya go. No apology for talking to me like I don't understand stuff?

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I tried uploading just the video since it's on a biased website but it was too big...about halfway down is a video of fauci talking about gain of function...the video is just him talking to a group...it's his own words, himself speaking in 2012

Steve Hilton slams Fauci amid resurfaced video on experiments

Next Revolution host Steve Hilton has slammed Dr Anthony Fauci for 'lying' about his role in gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology after a video shows him advocating experiments.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I can only find one instance. Is it possible he's changed his mind? I don't see where he's ever recanted the statement.

I won't lie that I'm not a fauci fan...I knew about him before covid and his "missteps"...he's said it multiple times over the years but I could only find that video...the search results with his name are just overwhelmingly spammed up with pro or con opinion stuff anymore...

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

There ya go. No apology for talking to me like I don't understand stuff?

I only had to explain it how many times?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I tried uploading just the video since it's on a biased website but it was too big...about halfway down is a video of fauci talking about gain of function...the video is just him talking to a group...it's his own words, himself speaking in 2012

Steve Hilton slams Fauci amid resurfaced video on experiments

Next Revolution host Steve Hilton has slammed Dr Anthony Fauci for 'lying' about his role in gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology after a video shows him advocating experiments.

www.dailymail.co.uk

He wrote a paper on it too. Does make you wonder. However, if "they" want to conduct secret experiments, I think they'd do a better job at keeping it secret than what we've seen. Hell how much money just disappears unaccounted for....

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

He wrote a paper on it too. Does make you wonder. However, if "they" want to conduct secret experiments, I think they'd do a better job at keeping it secret than what we've seen. Hell how much money just disappears unaccounted for....

Like I said originally I was just pointing out nih money went to gain of function research....i can't 100% prove one way or another how involved he was...he does have a track record suggesting he supports this line of research but at the same time there isn't any tangible proof he did it...so I just sit on the fence

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Like I said originally I was just pointing out nih money went to gain of function research....i can't 100% prove one way or another how involved he was...he does have a track record suggesting he supports this line of research but at the same time there isn't any tangible proof he did it...so I just sit on the fence

IMHO, Fauci isn't nearly high enough up the ladder to ochestrate some sort of sneaky back door illegal research without getting his head chopped off when he got caught. Then again maybe his pop culture status makes the powers that be hesitant to punish him.

IMHO, we probably are doing covert gain of function research right here in the US. If we're willing to build enough nukes to wipe out the world 5 times over, why we shy away from gain of function research?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Ok... sounds emotional RobGMN. What the whole story? What are people trying to stuff this bill with that has nothing to do with Veterans? Gotta be something right? Cause otherwise who wouldn't want healthcare for Vets?

Here’s the whole story:
“This bill updates policies and procedures related to Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care and benefits for veterans who have been exposed to toxic substances.

Specifically, the bill extends the eligibility period for VA hospital care, medical services, and nursing home care for combat veterans who served after September 11, 2001, and were exposed to toxic substances, radiation, or other conditions, including those who did not enroll to receive VA care during the eligibility period.”

S.3541 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Health Care for Burn Pit Veterans Act

Summary of S.3541 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Health Care for Burn Pit Veterans Act

www.congress.gov

Anyone who voted “nay” is an insufferable piece of shit. That’s not emotion. That’s fact.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Here’s the whole story:
“This bill updates policies and procedures related to Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care and benefits for veterans who have been exposed to toxic substances.

Specifically, the bill extends the eligibility period for VA hospital care, medical services, and nursing home care for combat veterans who served after September 11, 2001, and were exposed to toxic substances, radiation, or other conditions, including those who did not enroll to receive VA care during the eligibility period.”

S.3541 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Health Care for Burn Pit Veterans Act

Summary of S.3541 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Health Care for Burn Pit Veterans Act

www.congress.gov

Anyone who voted “nay” is an insufferable piece of shit. That’s not emotion. That’s fact.

100% emotion. "Feelings"

I just read over that link. Burn pits were overseas according to what is being described in and on several websites including the VA's literature on them.

This bill has "research" and "studies" for non-related things such as relating to 9/11. I also think the bill could be trimmed down. I think in 2 decades we probably have more than enough studies on 9/11. There is no need to waste more money on 9/11. The study of Cancer rates among vets. Really, they don't already do this? Come on. Veto. If this bill is for Burn Pit Vets then let it be that. My vote is NAY.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

View attachment 40994

The same thing that happened to all the Republicans that voted for Trump, then voted against him after he pooch-screwed the job for his four year term?
I think they call it making a new decision for a new situation, instead of just voting strictly because the GOP demands it.