Winners only.

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Nah. That’s ok. That’s not what people do to their neighborhood if you want to live in it long. I have more loyalty for my neighbors than I do for the government anyway.

“The government” is your taxpayer dollars.
If you’re not interested in stopping the fraud, why express concern that it’s happening?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Are you a simpleton? YOU have it right, but EVERYONE else in the world is wrong?
Put down the vodka; it's not helping you one bit.

Cry some more liberal tears.

 

[SlugButter]

“The government” is your taxpayer dollars.
If you’re not interested in stopping the fraud, why express concern that it’s happening?

I get that, but it’s not like “government” has served the poor areas very well. There’s no reason to be loyal to our government. I don’t actually live in the inner city anymore, but there’s no love for the man there. It’s a “take what you can get” attitude. You get yours, I’ll get mine. Live and let live. Snitches get stitches. For some people sayings like those are just in the movies, and for others it’s an actual way of life.

 

[Jesus Christ]

Rob is a Rat! watch what you say on here. He will turn you into the FBI for domestic terrorism if he hasnt already

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Cry some more liberal tears.

Nice try. Maybe practice some reading comprehension.
You can’t do anything else right, give that a try while you cry into your home entertainment system for your failed lot in life.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Rob is a Rat! watch what you say on here. He will turn you into the FBI for domestic terrorism if he hasnt already

Interesting about-face. First I’m a liberal, but now that I’m not giving the money away, I’m a rat.
So, all Conservapubs must be rats since they don’t want to give money away.
Got it

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I get that, but it’s not like “government” has served the poor areas very well. There’s no reason to be loyal to our government. I don’t actually live in the inner city anymore, but there’s no love for the man there. It’s a “take what you can get” attitude. You get yours, I’ll get mine. Live and let live. Snitches get stitches. For some people sayings like those are just in the movies, and for others it’s an actual way of life.

It would all be fine if the government just used Thx’s economic plan and told everyone to go to work. No welfare, no crime, no have-nots. Problem solved with just three words: “Go to work”. Wonder why HE’S not president?

 

[SlugButter]

Interesting about-face. First I’m a liberal, but now that I’m not giving the money away, I’m a rat.
So, all Conservapubs must be rats since they don’t want to give money away.
Got it

You can be a liberal and a rat simultaneously. Do you know what a rat is?

 

[Jesus Christ]

Rat = informant, to squeal, tattle tail, snitch, etc. He is truly out of touch with reality, fuckin idiot!

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

Context is key.
Trump wanted people to "fight like hell" based on the entirely false premise that the election had been stolen due to rampant voter fraud. Voter fraud that he could not, in all his power as president, obtain ANY proof of. Voter fraud that multiple studies across the US have shown does not exist. A complete lie on his part.
He wanted to "stop the steal" after he had lost the popular vote, after it was known that he would lose the electoral vote, on the DAY of the electoral vote. The DAY of the vote, when it is believed by scholars that "Article II of the Constitution prevents holding a presidential election again, thus putting it beyond the power of the courts to order a re-vote, as they have occasionally done for other offices. Others suggest that there is legal precedent for a presidential re-vote if there were flaws in the process."

With no proof of flaws in the process, and likely no way for the courts to change things, can you tell me what it MIGHT mean to "fight like hell" to "stop the steal"? With no LEGAL way to change the vote, what other means MIGHT there be?

Since this thread moves fast, what is the context of the suggested uprising by the Democrats? What were they wanting to fight against?

The details of Trump's son meeting with the Russian who said she had dirt on Hillary are well known. Hillary literally paid a foreign ex-spy (British) to use unreliable Russian sources, which now are now learning lied blatantly, to concoct wild tales of pee tapes and Russian blackmail that never occurred. Yet you are mad that Trump Jr met with a Russian who claimed to have damning evidence against Hillary Clinton. Trump Jr said, on the record, that as soon as he realized the Russian lawyer (and now know is probably a spy) met him under false pretenses, he left. So you are mad Trump Jr met a Russian who claimed to have evidence against Hillary, but you seem underwhelmed to the point of not caring about Hillary paying Russians (indirectly) to make up lies about Trump. Flaw #1 in your logic.

"Clinton is still claiming she won the popular vote by 3 Million, but lost the election, which makes no sense at all. I do not see any evidence where she encouraged people to attempt a coup to put her in the seat instead of Trump."

You refusing to admit Hillary, literally to this very day, claiming Russia influenced the 2016 election in Trump's favor, AND paid Russians (indirectly through Fusion GPS) to get the Obama DoJ to spy on the Trump campaign, was an attempted insurrection, is of little consequence to me. You have already shown your double standard mentality. Trump merely using the wording "fight like hell" while couching it with the word "peacefully" is enough for you to consider it treason, but I have to copy/paste the definition of the word "uprising" to you because you claim you don't understand how that could be considered insurrection. Like I said, you aren't even attempting to pose a reasonable argument here, you are merely applying one set of standards to Trump, and another set of standards to Hillary, Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Kamala Harris, etc.

"With no proof of flaws in the process, and likely no way for the courts to change things, can you tell me what it MIGHT mean to "fight like hell" to "stop the steal"? With no LEGAL way to change the vote, what other means MIGHT there be?"

The protests, and yes riots, on Jan 6th, were a call for more investigations into whether or not the votes were legit. But lets put that aside and I'll simply repeat myself... the dems spent all 4 years of Trump's administration claiming "mostly peaceful protests" were a valid form of fighting what they considered an illegit presidency, but when it comes to Jan 6th, you do a 180 and claim "mostly peaceful protesting" was obviously ineffective so he must have meant violence even though he specifically said to protest "peacefully". You don't get to have it both ways, no matter how many times you keep repeating the same double standard. Flaw #2.

Calls for "uprisings"... totally cool. "Unrest in the streets"... totally cool. "Protesters should not let up"... totally cool (and effective). Hillary paying a foreign spy to pay Russians to lie about Trump... totally cool. But Trump saying to "fight like hell" "peacefully"... omg that's treason! lol

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

You can be a liberal and a rat simultaneously. Do you know what a rat is?

Rat = informant, to squeal, tattle tail, snitch, etc. He is truly out of touch with reality, fuckin idiot!

So 90 percent of the people here are rats.

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

The details of Trump's son meeting with the Russian who said she had dirt on Hillary are well known. Hillary literally paid a foreign ex-spy (British) to use unreliable Russian sources, which now are now learning lied blatantly, to concoct wild tales of pee tapes and Russian blackmail that never occurred. Yet you are mad that Trump Jr met with a Russian who claimed to have damning evidence against Hillary Clinton. Trump Jr said, on the record, that as soon as he realized the Russian lawyer (and now know is probably a spy) met him under false pretenses, he left. So you are mad Trump Jr met a Russian who claimed to have evidence against Hillary, but you seem underwhelmed to the point of not caring about Hillary paying Russians (indirectly) to make up lies about Trump. Flaw #1 in your logic.

"Clinton is still claiming she won the popular vote by 3 Million, but lost the election, which makes no sense at all. I do not see any evidence where she encouraged people to attempt a coup to put her in the seat instead of Trump."

You refusing to admit Hillary, literally to this very day, claiming Russia influenced the 2016 election in Trump's favor, AND paid Russians (indirectly through Fusion GPS) to get the Obama DoJ to spy on the Trump campaign, was an attempted insurrection, is of little consequence to me. You have already shown your double standard mentality. Trump merely using the wording "fight like hell" while couching it with the word "peacefully" is enough for you to consider it treason, but I have to copy/paste the definition of the word "uprising" to you because you claim you don't understand how that could be considered insurrection. Like I said, you aren't even attempting to pose a reasonable argument here, you are merely applying one set of standards to Trump, and another set of standards to Hillary, Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Kamala Harris, etc.

"With no proof of flaws in the process, and likely no way for the courts to change things, can you tell me what it MIGHT mean to "fight like hell" to "stop the steal"? With no LEGAL way to change the vote, what other means MIGHT there be?"

The protests, and yes riots, on Jan 6th, were a call for more investigations into whether or not the votes were legit. But lets put that aside and I'll simply repeat myself... the dems spent all 4 years of Trump's administration claiming "mostly peaceful protests" were a valid form of fighting what they considered an illegit presidency, but when it comes to Jan 6th, you do a 180 and claim "mostly peaceful protesting" was obviously ineffective so he must have meant violence even though he specifically said to protest "peacefully". You don't get to have it both ways, no matter how many times you keep repeating the same double standard. Flaw #2.

Calls for "uprisings"... totally cool. "Unrest in the streets"... totally cool. "Protesters should not let up"... totally cool (and effective). Hillary paying a foreign spy to pay Russians to lie about Trump... totally cool. But Trump saying to "fight like hell" "peacefully"... omg that's treason! lol

You do know that Hillary isn't president right?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You can be a liberal and a rat simultaneously. Do you know what a rat is?

I know what a rat is, which I’m not, but I was playing along with his attempt at spinning everything to make me the bad guy.

I guess he appreciates people who steal his tax dollars. Which means no complaints from him about government waste, people on welfare, stimulus packages, Wall Street thieves, etc.
Good. Less opportunity for him to speak here.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Nice try. Maybe practice some reading comprehension.
You can’t do anything else right, give that a try while you cry into your home entertainment system for your failed lot in life.

You mad? It's pretty much impossible to control people on the internet and make them agree with your retarded views and speak to you the only way YOU can understand anything. That being literally. It takes literally no intelligence to quote people all day long and give them dictionary definitions. This is what you do though because in doing this, you can't technically be wrong... but you are never right either because all you do is quote other people. No original thoughts of your own. But you already know if you spew out your thoughts you will quickly show how little you actually know. You should stick to numbers because they are harder to argue with.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Rat = informant, to squeal, tattle tail, snitch, etc. He is truly out of touch with reality, fuckin idiot!

Nice try, dipshit. I’m not the one who reports, I’m the one who prosecutes after the report is received.
You’re really ruining the reputation the Catholic Church has built around you.
I expected omnipotence. Got a dunce instead.
Fvcking idiot.