Winners only.

[Jesus Christ]

LOL @ the meth head that thinks he's a lawyer, Extremists get more entertaining everyday

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

LOL @ the meth head that thinks he's a lawyer, Extremists get more entertaining everyday

Nope. I prosecute. Not an attorney, never claimed to be.

 

[Jesus Christ]

who do you prosecute? Shadow People?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

who do you prosecute? Shadow People?

Nope. People committing fraud.

 

[Jesus Christ]

Nope. People committing fraud.

What kind of fraud?.......people posting political misinformation on an forum, is it your job to set them straight? LOL

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

What kind of fraud?.......people posting political misinformation on an forum, is it your job to set them straight? LOL

Public Assistance fraud.

 

[Jesus Christ]

well you must not be very good at your job because you got the Rittenhouse trial all wrong....remind me never to hire you

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

LOL @ the meth head that thinks he's a lawyer, Extremists get more entertaining everyday

Bruh you're the rock head that thinks he knows everything. That was a dumb f*cking post bro

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

well you must not be very good at your job because you got the Rittenhouse trial all wrong....remind me never to hire you

Hate to break it to you bro but you didn't exactly get it right now did you? Only I did. I am THE Chosen One. All hail @Slo_Ride

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Right, so just because *I* call that webbed footed creature with an orange bill that quacks, swims, flies, and lays eggs a duck, doesn't mean it IS one, right?
From Oxofrd: N. a violent uprising against an authority or government;
a situation in which a large group of people try to take political control of their own country with violence

But yes, I'm sure you are correct and Oxford is once again incorrect. Just like they were (and Eastwood Spring mfg) with "monoleaf spring". As are all the attorneys, judges, and all the news media who are using the term. Even Trumps own defense corrected a claim that it was not an insurrection: "Trump’s defense team, Michael van der Veen, stated: “The question before us is not whether there was a violent insurrection of the Capitol. On that point, everyone agrees.” He said this in DIRECT response to the following claim: "‘Insurrection’ is a term of art defined in the law, and it involves taking over a country, a shadow government, taking the TV stations over, and having some plan on what you are going to do when you finally take power. Clearly, this is not that",

Lemme guess: They're all fallible humans and they ALL got it wrong, but YOU are right, simply because you believe you are?
Sorry, not believing it no matter how many times you repeat it. You honestly sound like a clown when you post this crap.

1, usually by violence - The actions of the people were violent. People were hurt and people died. At least 140 law enforcement officers alone were treated for injuries.
2. an organized attempt - They were organized. Multiple people have admitted they were involved in "dozens' of planning meetings. Some people brought weapons of various types.
3. to defeat their government and take control of their country -They were there to prevent a vote from being completed. To defeat the democratic process. A vote that would remove Trump from presidency and put Biden in his place. That is trying to take control of our country by stopping the democratic process and keeping someone as POTUS that has been rightfully voted out. It just so happens that these were American citizens doing this in America, to the American government.

The events of Jan 6th meet all of the points in both your AND my quoted definitions from OED. If it meets even more points to fit additional definitions so be it. But it fits every point of the definition, so it can't NOT be an insurrection. That'd be like saying a duck is not a bird because it is aquatic. First and foremost it is a bird. The additional stuff makes it a duck.

I want to say it'd be fun to prosecute against you in front of a judge, but it wouldn't be. No challenge at all. Maybe if you did some research instead of listening to what you FEEL are the right answers given by others who are also unknowing...


BTW - good sidestep on having to prove your claim of people being paid by the gov't to not go back to work. Yet ANOTHER claim you had no backing for. Well done.

You are so damn easy to trigger. My definition is the same so why would I say it's wrong. I'm saying YOU are wrong. They did not attempt to take over the government with violence.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

well you must not be very good at your job because you got the Rittenhouse trial all wrong....remind me never to hire you

I'm not for hire, and Rittenhouse wasn't committing Public Assistance fraud.
Comprehension isn't your bag, huh?
So much for omnipotent.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You are so damn easy to trigger. My definition is the same so why would I say it's wrong. I'm saying YOU are wrong. They did not attempt to take over the government with violence.

Are you a simpleton? YOU have it right, but EVERYONE else in the world is wrong?
Put down the vodka; it's not helping you one bit.

 

[SlugButter]

I'm not for hire, and Rittenhouse wasn't committing Public Assistance fraud.
Comprehension isn't your bag, huh?

Do you work directly for the government, or is it private companies contracted to do this?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Do you work directly for the government, or is it private companies contracted to do this?

State gov't contract

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

Are you a simpleton? YOU have it right, but EVERYONE else in the world is wrong?
Put down the vodka; it's not helping you one bit.

Always thought of him as more of a Fireball guy. I seriously don't know how people drink that shit. It is beyond disgusting. I'd rather get high off of shit and piss in a jar then even think about drinking that shit.