Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
"That would depend on what you mean by "started".

The following Presidents are (or were) Democrats except as noted.

Widrow Wilson - President when the US entered WWI

Franklin Deleno Roosevelt - President when the US entered WWII

Harry S. Truman - President when the US entered the Korean War.

Vietnam is a bit tricky to name the President who was in office when the "war started".
Harry S. Truman actively supported the French in their Indochina War
Dwight Eisenhower (Republican) was President when the US agreed to supply up to 10,000 advisors to support the new South Vietnam state following the Paris Peace Talks in 1954.
John F Kennedy was President when the US expanded it's role in Vietnam to exceed the 10,000 advisory limit, started flying South Vietnamese troops to and from battle in helicopters, and started flying limited air strikes in South Vietnam.
Lyndon Johnson was President when the US involvement escalated to the point where we had a half a million troops in Vietnam and was conducting and ongoing air war against North Vietnam.

President Clinton was in office when the US was involved in a the NATO air campaign in Kosovo.

During President Obama's Administration, the US was actively involved in pre-existing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan but also engaged in a air campaign to oust Gadaffi in Libya and reengaged in Iraq and now Syria to fight ISIS.

Note that the only Democratic President since the start of the 20th century NOT on the above list is Jimmy Carter."
 
There’s not much difference between the Bush’s and clintons and Obama’s. The president no longer even partially runs the country, if you haven’t noticed. It’s all a show now. Do you think it matters if Clinton or bush or whoever next gets into office? The result will be the same. To sides of the same coin. Twin wings of the same bird. Democratic vs republican paradigm hasn’t been real at the top for a long time. You’ve got a choice between a selected person and another selected person, almost always. They aren’t selected for your interests in mind. When’s the last time we’ve really not been at war? Selling weapons is the #1 industry in America, lol. Of course we’re going to war with somebody, for reasons.
 
"That would depend on what you mean by "started".

The following Presidents are (or were) Democrats except as noted.

Widrow Wilson - President when the US entered WWI

Franklin Deleno Roosevelt - President when the US entered WWII

Harry S. Truman - President when the US entered the Korean War.

Vietnam is a bit tricky to name the President who was in office when the "war started".
Harry S. Truman actively supported the French in their Indochina War
Dwight Eisenhower (Republican) was President when the US agreed to supply up to 10,000 advisors to support the new South Vietnam state following the Paris Peace Talks in 1954.
John F Kennedy was President when the US expanded it's role in Vietnam to exceed the 10,000 advisory limit, started flying South Vietnamese troops to and from battle in helicopters, and started flying limited air strikes in South Vietnam.
Lyndon Johnson was President when the US involvement escalated to the point where we had a half a million troops in Vietnam and was conducting and ongoing air war against North Vietnam.

President Clinton was in office when the US was involved in a the NATO air campaign in Kosovo.

During President Obama's Administration, the US was actively involved in pre-existing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan but also engaged in a air campaign to oust Gadaffi in Libya and reengaged in Iraq and now Syria to fight ISIS.

Note that the only Democratic President since the start of the 20th century NOT on the above list is Jimmy Carter."

I should've said when we were the ones invading first. Nbd, war seems to be part of our economy these days. Unless, it's Saudi Arabia, they get a free pass.
 
I should've said when we were the ones invading first. Nbd, war seems to be part of our economy these days. Unless, it's Saudi Arabia, they get a free pass.
FDR warned us about the military industrial complex. He saw from the very beginning that the money was rolling in, and that our military would be the most powerful single entity in the world. The inmates have been running the asylum since 1945. No elected body of government can do a thing about it either. The military is compartmentalized within the pentagon, and none of our votes or political appointments have any control over how they operate.
 
FDR warned us about the military industrial complex. He saw from the very beginning that the money was rolling in, and that our military would be the most powerful single entity in the world. The inmates have been running the asylum since 1945. No elected body of government can do a thing about it either. The military is compartmentalized within the pentagon, and none of our votes or political appointments have any control over how they operate.

It’s bc of operation paperclip. JFK got killed trying to stop what FDR warned about
 
South Park was onto something many years ago with the China Probrem epsiode.


Whats the pran to take over America? I forgot.....


Bing bong ching chong, we are Chinese peepar.


27404
 
It was actually Dwight Eisenhower who warned of the military industrial complex in his last address to the public before leaving office.
All four presidents that where killed each wanted to use sound money gold or gold and silver and for the government to issue money or made significant changes to do just that.

Lincoln green backs.
Garfield advocated for only using hard money low debt. He lasted 100 days. McKinley also an advocate of gold to only be used as money. In other words no fiat made up out of thin air money.
Jfk signed executive order 11110 six months later he was assassinated. Shortly after that LBL stopped the executive order and borrowed money from central banks to fund the war. The fed and central banks have been in complete control of issuing money since LBL stopped the order. no president has attempted to take back control of issuing our own money since jfk. Coincidence? Maybe.
The dollar is the dominant global currency. We’ve fought for it and continue to fight for its control. Ask any country what happens if they don’t pay for oil in dollars. If we think we can take over a country if they use something besides the dollar to trade for oil that’s what’s going to happen. If not like Russia and China they will have sanctions against them. Iran and Syria aren’t trading oil in dollars or have a central bank controlled by the select few who control the majority of central banks around the world.
Every time we take over a country or force a regime change they get a new shiny central bank
Look up sometime how many central banks the Rothchilds are associated with and their locations. It’s all over the world.
He who controls the money cares not who makes the laws.
FDR warned us about the military industrial complex. He saw from the very beginning that the money was rolling in, and that our military would be the most powerful single entity in the world. The inmates have been running the asylum since 1945. No elected body of government can do a thing about it either. The military is compartmentalized within the pentagon, and none of our votes or political appointments have any control over how they operate.
 
It was actually Dwight Eisenhower who warned of the military industrial complex in his last address to the public before leaving office.
All four presidents that where killed each wanted to use sound money gold or gold and silver and for the government to issue money or made significant changes to do just that.

Lincoln green backs.
Garfield advocated for only using hard money low debt. He lasted 100 days. McKinley also an advocate of gold to only be used as money. In other words no fiat made up out of thin air money.
Jfk signed executive order 11110 six months later he was assassinated. Shortly after that LBL stopped the executive order and borrowed money from central banks to fund the war. The fed and central banks have been in complete control of issuing money since LBL stopped the order. no president has attempted to take back control of issuing our own money since jfk. Coincidence? Maybe.
The dollar is the dominant global currency. We’ve fought for it and continue to fight for its control. Ask any country what happens if they don’t pay for oil in dollars. If we think we can take over a country if they use something besides the dollar to trade for oil that’s what’s going to happen. If not like Russia and China they will have sanctions against them. Iran and Syria aren’t trading oil in dollars or have a central bank controlled by the select few who control the majority of central banks around the world.
Every time we take over a country or force a regime change they get a new shiny central bank
Look up sometime how many central banks the Rothchilds are associated with and their locations. It’s all over the world.
He who controls the money cares not who makes the laws.

That's what I meant is Eisenhower. Idk why I said FDR. I had Eisenhower's face in my head and said FDR. Eisenhower's fairwell address says it all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,091,085
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top