Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
E7BA8B1F-F4CA-4CF0-B573-AC47862F970A.jpeg
 
No, dummy, I am not "attempting" to insult you... I am just doing it. You are such a diick eater. <--- A direct insult statement.

So you "...already showed plenty of direct quotes..." Any of those by chance the one where he specifically said "I am running for the Presidency of the United States"? <--- I know, keep dodging the direct question.

The phrase where you also say the word "spin" in an attempt to make people think I am backpedaling when I dumb-down words and phrases for you.

I have supported my argument several times now as you continue to avoid the question. My argument continues to be that until Trump outright says the words that he is running for the Presidency of the United States then all you are doing is basing your injudicious comments on assumptions and feelings. YOU HAVE NO PROOF OF ANYTHING. NO FACTS. YOU GOT NOTHING.

One cannot convict a person in a court of law based on assumptions, feelings or vague comments. Why would anyone jump to judgment, such as you do, without provable facts? This is what you are attempting to do and what makes you not only an assshole who just likes to argue about everything but also a trolling hypocrite.

Let us see if you avoid the direct question in bold yet again.
I already answered all your questions. Just because you’re not intelligent enough to comprehend them, does not mean they’re incorrect.

You think you’re a bright guy, but you’re really not.
Bright guys can live on their own at 47 y.o. Bright guys don’t deliver pizzas part-time at 47 (with no f/t job). Bright guys don’t have an aneurysm over gas price fluctuations at 47. Bright guys at 47 y.o don’t think they know definitions better than the Oxford English Dictionary. Bright guys at 47 know the difference between “Democrat” and “democratic”. Bright guys at 47 aren’t **********. Bright guys at 47 will reevaluate their opinions when presented with facts that show they are very obviously incorrect.
Just the tip of the iceberg that shows you’re not bright. Hell, you don’t even make an EFFORT.

BTW - Your court of law example is fully flawed and also shows you are not bright. Convictions can and do happen with inference. Reference Charles Manson. Convicted of 1st degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder.
Never killed anyone and never directly ordered a murder to be committed. Died in prison.

If you want to make up examples to support your thesis, at least TRY to make them close to factual. Sheesh.
 
Last edited:
again, department of labor releases another report stating that wages are being crippled by inflation and these libtards will argue against it until they are blue in the face

On Friday morning, the Labor Department revealed that average hourly earnings rose by 5.6% year-over-year in March, up from 5.1% the month before. But surging inflation – which hit a fresh 40-year high in February– has erased those would-be gains for workers.

By that measure, the typical U.S. worker is actually worse off today than they were a year ago, even though nominal wages are rising at the fastest pace in years. That's because inflation is also soaring.

i guess we should all just take their word over the actual Labor Department though lol
 
I already answered all your questions. Just because you’re not intelligent enough to comprehend them, does not mean they’re incorrect.

You think you’re a bright guy, but you’re really not.
Bright guys can live on their own at 47 y.o. Bright guys don’t deliver pizzas part-time at 47 (with no f/t job). Bright guys don’t have an aneurysm over gas price fluctuations at 47. Bright guys at 47 y.o don’t think they know definitions better than the Oxford English Dictionary. Bright guys at 47 know the difference between “Democrat” and “democratic”. Bright guys at 47 aren’t **********. Bright guys at 47 will reevaluate their opinions when presented with facts that show they are very obviously incorrect.
Just the tip of the iceberg that shows you’re not bright. Hell, you don’t even make an EFFORT.

BTW - Your court of law example is fully flawed and also shows you are not bright. Convictions can and do happen with inference. Reference Charles Manson. Convicted of 1st degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder.
Never killed anyone and never directly ordered a murder to be committed. Died in prison.

If you want to make up examples to support your thesis, at least TRY to make them close to factual. Sheesh.
So this is what you do when you can't support YOUR bullshit? lol you are so emotional. I knew you were a chick. Explains the love to deep throat the cock. None of your failed attempt above to save face changes the fact that you are a hypocrite and can't back up your feelings with facts or proof that "Trump is running again". You poor lil fella.
 
So this is what you do when you can't support YOUR bullshit? lol you are so emotional. I knew you were a chick. Explains the love to deep throat the cock. None of your failed attempt above to save face changes the fact that you are a hypocrite and can't back up your feelings with facts or proof that "Trump is running again". You poor lil fella.
Emotional is the guy who isn’t intelligent enough to support his own opinions, and instead turns to 4th-grade attempts at bullying.
You fail so often, you’re a master at it. Too bad it’s your only skill. Maybe work on one that’ll help you afford gas for your heap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,102,683
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260515_202650612_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260515_202732887_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top