Winners only.

[RobGMN Premium Member]

What about all this "anti-censorship" rhetoric?
Is censorship good, or bad?
I guess he doesn't know everything about everything if the concept of cable TV and the airwaves confuses him?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

It IS funny how Thxone has his "go-tos" every time the discussion leads down the path of him being wrong.
He makes a mistake, but it's other people who can't "comprehend".
He makes a mistake and it's "you are using the wrong definition of the word. I use it THIS way"
He makes a mistake and goes off on some tangent without ever addressing his mistake, then later insists he DID address his mistake and proved himself right (without ever having done so).
He makes a mistake and when it is proved so, he goes off on a ********** rant.
He makes a mistake and when it is proved so, says he is right simply because he says so.
He makes a mistake and when it is proved so, he complains about the conversation in the thread.

There are many other plays, but these are some that get repeated with regularity
Some good comedy here.

Tell me how I am wrong about my own post and what I meant by posting it. Tell me how I am wrong even after clarification so you could understand. Tell me how I am wrong even after giving you an example.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Tell me how I am wrong about my own post and what I meant by posting it. Tell me how I am wrong even after clarification so you could understand. Tell me how I am wrong even after giving you an example.

When your post is quoted or screenshotted and you say "I never did that", you're wrong.
Pretty basic stuff.
And you've done it a BUNCH of times.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Also, make sure we are talking about the same post. I know how you love going in circles.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

When your post is quoted or screenshotted and you say "I never did that", you're wrong.
Pretty basic stuff.
And you've done it a BUNCH of times.

Be specific Rob

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Also, make sure we are talking about the same post. I know how you love going in circles.

Ahhh, another one of your plays. You cry about people going in circles, yet when the convo is directed right back to the topic. you refuse to talk about the topic.

Remember that time I tried to get you to speak directly to the topic/s you veered away from, and you refused?
How many times did i ask you the same questions about the topic, and how many times did you fail?

Find any post where you claim you "never said that" after I quoted or even screenshotted it.
YOU are the one claiming the quotes and screenshots are not representative of what you posted, so the burden is on YOU, kid.
You want to deny "photographic" evidence? Go for it.

Maybe go back and tell me how you never tried to defend Loy Mauch after arguing that the things he did were just fabricated to make a negative narrative.
Do you recall that episode?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Ahhh, another one of your plays. You cry about people going in circles, yet when the convo is directed right back to the topic. you refuse to talk about the topic.

Remember that time I tried to get you to speak directly to the topic/s you veered away from, and you refused?
How many times did i ask you the same questions about the topic, and how many times did you fail?

Find any post where you claim you "never said that" after I quoted or even screenshotted it.
YOU are the one claiming the quotes and screenshots are not representative of what you posted, so the burden is on YOU, kid.
You want to deny "photographic" evidence? Go for it.

Maybe go back and tell me how you never tried to defend Loy Mauch after arguing that the things he did were just fabricated to make a negative narrative.
Do you recall that episode?

Ok, so when you are given specific instructions you can't seem to be, well, specific. Can't have a conversation if you close all the doors Rob.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I love "OOPS. We're having some problems. Please try again later" And then the message draft gets deleted.
Good times.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So, I referenced your particular post.
What part of that is not an effort to be sure we "are talking about the same post"?

So let's avoid the circles you create, and talk about that one post.
Tell us how defending Loy Mauch is NOT defending Loy Mauch.

I never defended him. I never had a need too, I only know his name because you posted it. So tell me how making statements and voicing my opinion is a defense of him. What defense am I using exactly and how do you claim I executed the defense. Site facts and be specific. None of your paraphrasing or "it looks like" crap. Support your accusations.

And this is your big circle. You take and action that is CLEARLY a defense: You offer excuses and denials for his actions without knowing anything about him or what he did. You then say it is not a defense.
Denial and excuses are absolutely a defense action.

So, which are we supposed to believe? That your posts where you try to deny and/or excuse his actions without having any knowledge of him or the situation, or your denial that you made those posts as a defensive effort?

I never defended him. I never had a need too, I only know his name because you posted it. So tell me how making statements and voicing my opinion is a defense of him. What defense am I using exactly and how do you claim I executed the defense. Site facts and be specific. None of your paraphrasing or "it looks like" crap. Support your accusations.

You only know his name from reading my post, yet quotes of his own words and statements about groups he belongs to are suspect to you for some reason.
What made them suspect? The fact that they span two decades? The fact that they were his words published in newspapers? The fact he has made such statements on public record?
What was your due diligence to think the information was wrong?

Denying and providing excuses don't "look like" a defensive move, they ARE a defensive move.
yes, you know better than experts do, but experts say that denial is a defense mechanism.

Or was it just a knee-jerk reaction because he is a Republican?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

View attachment 54867

So, I referenced your particular post.
What part of that is not an effort to be sure we "are talking about the same post"?

So let's avoid the circles you create, and talk about that one post.
Tell us how defending Loy Mauch is NOT defending Loy Mauch.

I never defended him. I never had a need too, I only know his name because you posted it. So tell me how making statements and voicing my opinion is a defense of him. What defense am I using exactly and how do you claim I executed the defense. Site facts and be specific. None of your paraphrasing or "it looks like" crap. Support your accusations.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

View attachment 54867

So, I referenced your particular post.
What part of that is not an effort to be sure we "are talking about the same post"?

So let's avoid the circles you create, and talk about that one post.
Tell us how defending Loy Mauch is NOT defending Loy Mauch.


And this is your big circle. You take and action that is CLEARLY a defense: You offer excuses and denials for his actions without knowing anything about him or what he did. You then say it is not a defense.
Denial and excuses are absolutely a defense action.

So, which are we supposed to believe? That your posts where you try to deny and/or excuse his actions without having any knowledge of him or the situation, or your denial that you made those posts as a defensive effort?

What was the point in this? Can't you just answer the questions? I said the information you posted about the guy looked pieced together... Which part of that made you think I was defending him?

 

[administrator]

The back and forth is getting pretty bad again. Rob has used up his allotted posts for the day or it would still be churning.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Rob, you can ask the admins to remove any 15 post limits. I had to ask myself and it was removed.

On to the guy you're talking about. My reason for my statement about it seemingly being pieced together is because the post was of incomplete or partial statements. In no way what you posted gave all the information. That is fine if you are trying to make someone look a certain way for whatever reason. I know about these kinds of tactics so I made it known that the information looked incomplete. I don't know about anyone else but I prefer all the information and I made it clear when i said apparently YOU are ok with partial information if it helps you hate someone. Do you not remember that? Why does it upset you that I don't hate someone just because you hate them? Why wouldn't you point me in the direction of his rants and let me form my own opinion? Should everyone just hate all the things you hate without question even if they don't have all the information. Also, why do I need due diligence to verify your hatred? Live and let live huh?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The back and forth is getting pretty bad again. Rob has used up his allotted posts for the day or it would still be churning.

Seemed mild to me, he wasn't offending me. Should I back off as well?

 

[administrator]

It just doesn’t really offer anything towards the discussion other than one line personal bickering. That should be taken to private text, email, chat, etc. The bickering turns more serious as it progresses, as we have seen.