"Wanting" to do things, and actually DOING them are two very distinctly different things.I’m sorry dude, I don’t even like Trump that much, but you need to get your brain scanned and show it to us to see if there’s anything wrong going on in there. Trump was the biggest border hawk we’ve had in modern times. I mean, he wanted to literally go to war with the cartels, use the military, stuff like that, because they’re killing people in mass with drugs, and they’re human trafficking tons of people, where many kids and women get ***** as they’re trafficked. That’s just an absurd statement from you. Biden, by FAR, has basically flooded our country with people who don’t care about our country, and you’re really something special, if you don’t understand that. You definitely don’t understand a damn thing about warfare.
Much like his desire and claims to be the best and the smartest at everything, he simply didn't walk the walk.
Statistics prove that he was actually weaker on border control than Biden has been, by far. The influx of illegals under Trump was the highest it had been since the early 2000's, but apprehensions and border encounters did not rise commensurately. FFS, what is currently called "The Border Crisis" actually began while Trump was in office. You want to blame Biden for what happened whiel Trump was POTUS? That's rich.
Crossings/attempts have certainly risen under Biden, but the increase in encounters/apprehensions grew at a rate FAR faster than they did under Trump. That's a fact, not a conjecture.
And no, the stats aren't faked. They're provided by the same people that have been providing them for decades. They didn't lie in 2000 with the plan to make Trump look bad in 2017.
Talking points, but not relevant at all to the statistics of who was more effective against illegal immigration control. And again, the stats are in favor of Biden. I've posted them many times here. if you think they are incorrect, go ahead and provide some data and explanation of where the numbers are wrong.because they’re killing people in mass with drugs, and they’re human trafficking tons of people, where many kids and women get ***** as they’re trafficked
Going off on weird tangents doesn't prove your argument for you. It just indicates your argument likely has no substance behind it.
