Winners only.

[RobGMN]

In all fairness, he has amended his position from "sexual orientation is a choice" to "only homosexuality is a choice and heterosexuality is not a choice." Therefore, he never chose to be heterosexual. Ironically, all the homosexual people I know feel it's the exact opposite; they were just "born" homosexual and most of them tried choosing to be heterosexual, but ultimately "defaulted" to homosexuality.

His penis made him exempt from having to make the choice that must be made - “period”.

He’s got so many theories that fall apart under the slightest scrutiny, but declares them with such authority. “period” means he is right, and demands there be no further discussion.
Aggressively ignorant.

Do you know Geddy’s real name is Gary? His parents were immigrants and his mother’s heavy accent made it sound like she was calling him “Geddy”. All his friends copied her, and he just accepted it as his name.

 

[metalheadjoe]

Just curious, but who do you right wingers consider to be the leaders of the GOP? Trump obviously. DeSantis is out there, but he doesn't really strike me as a "leader." But who do you think speaks for the House conservatives - Marjorie in Chargorie? And the Senate, I'd guess McConnell, but he strikes me as weak. How about outside of politicians - Kari Lake, Tucker Carlson, Hannity, Russell Brand???

MSN

www.msn.com

Jim Jordan has been solid. I wish Trey Gowdy was still in the ring. Desantis is fantastic. Outside of congress I like Bongino and Shapiro.

 

[ThxOne]

So you actually are trying to claim hetero/homosexuality is both a choice and not a choice simultaneously. Just so I have this straight, you're saying having an option between 2 things, only one of the options is actually a choice, "choosing the default" isn't actually making a choice? For example, if I don't do the dishes this morning, I didn't make a choice, but if do the dishes then I made a choice? What about when I park my car at work - which parking space is the "non-choice" space and which one/s are the choice spaces? If I'm playing a video game and decide not to type in a name and go with the default of "Player1" then I didn't make a choice?

To quote Getty Lee: "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice."

Additionally, you said "abnormalities" don't count when questioned about people with both sets of organs. However, there are other abnormalities. So what if somebody grows up in a 2 daddy/mommy family and therefore views homosexuality as normal, do they then have to make the choice to be hetero?

No, I'm not saying that at all.

 

[ThxOne]

I have nothing against you or an agenda. On the LGBTQxyz crap, I'm probably more aligned with your beliefs than Rob's. I just fail to see the logic of how anything ****/hetero or otherwise can be both a choice and not a choice simultaneously. However, I do like to see logic and consistency in a narrative or argument.

Do you choose to be born with a penis?
Does a man choose to blow another man?

 

[Buck]

Student shot 2 faculty members at East High School

A student shot two faculty members at East High School on Wednesday morning.

www.cbsnews.com

 

[Buck]

‘Killing Me!’ Trump Haters Can’t Contain Themselves Over AI-Generated Photos of Cops Nailing and Jailing Trump

Fans of Trump's impending arrest and imprisonment are having a field day sharing images of Trump being chased down, arrested, and jailed — all generated by AI.

www.mediaite.com

 

[Buck]

Wtf is going on in schools

 

[Jimi77]

His penis made him exempt from having to make the choice that must be made - “period”.

He’s got so many theories that fall apart under the slightest scrutiny, but declares them with such authority. “period” means he is right, and demands there be no further discussion.
Aggressively ignorant.

Do you know Geddy’s real name is Gary? His parents were immigrants and his mother’s heavy accent made it sound like she was calling him “Geddy”. All his friends copied her, and he just accepted it as his name.

I didn't know that about Geddy.

Personally, I'm going with "no choice" on both counts since all the heteros & ***** I've ever had that conversation with all fall in the "no choice" camp. I certainly didn't have to make a choice.

 

[SHO'NUFF]

My bad, I didn't have the TV set to channel 3

 

[ThxOne]

His penis made him exempt from having to make the choice that must be made - “period”.

He’s got so many theories that fall apart under the slightest scrutiny, but declares them with such authority. “period” means he is right, and demands there be no further discussion.
Aggressively ignorant.

Do you know Geddy’s real name is Gary? His parents were immigrants and his mother’s heavy accent made it sound like she was calling him “Geddy”. All his friends copied her, and he just accepted it as his name.

Oh Rob, so adamant in your stance that you know more than everyone else or know better. Let me flip your childish shit back at you. Answer MY questions with a simple yes or no unless you think they will destroy all arguments you will ever have about sex.

Do you choose to be born with a penis or a vagina before you are born?
I already know the correct answer.

Once you are born, in this example with a penis, when you reach sexual maturity, what biological roll do you play in reproduction?
I already know the correct answer.

If you are a man, born a male, born with a penis, mature sexually as a man with a penis and you have sex with another man even though you know you cannot produce a child with this man, was that a choice?
I already know the correct answer.

 

[metalheadjoe]

Then why are factually wrong so often Tucker???

'I hate being factually wrong': Tucker Carlson owns up to spreading fake 'dead voters' story

Fox News anchor Tucker Carlson poured his heart out over his leaked text messages trashing former President Donald Trump and his lies about the 2020 election during a call-in to Tuesday's edition of Bo Snerdly's Rush Hour."Tucker, listen, I've had a number of people saying they read all these...

www.alternet.org

I don't think he's factually wrong very often. He phrases things in a way that makes low iq viewers think his opinions are facts: he phrases things like "that person should be arrested immediately", which is his opinion, but some people still get their hopes up. His biggest impact is causing distrust in government, because he makes good points and has convincing guests and nothing ever comes of it. Hunter Biden, Tony Boblinski, chinese virologist whistle-blower to name a few.

 

[RobGMN]

Oh Rob, so adamant in your stance that you know more than everyone else or know better. Let me flip your childish shit back at you. Answer MY questions with a simple yes or no unless you think they will destroy all arguments you will ever have about sex.

Do you choose to be born with a penis or a vagina before you are born?
I already know the correct answer.

A question that has no relevance to your theory that people choose their sexual orientation, but (a direct answer to one of your dumbest questions yet): NO ONE chooses what organs they are born with, or without (which actually happens).

Once you are born, in this example with a penis, when you reach sexual maturity, what biological roll do you play in reproduction?
I already know the correct answer.

A direct answer to your question: The rolE you play in reproduction depends on if you are born with the ability to produce sperm, and further with the ability to get that sperm all the way to the female ovum.
If you are born without the capability to fertilize that ovum, then you play no rolE in reproduction.

If you are a man, born a male, born with a penis, mature sexually as a man with a penis and you have sex with another man even though you know you cannot produce a child with this man, was that a choice?
I already know the correct answer.

A direct answer to your question: YES, any action you personally take is by choice, whether it is to have sex with a woman or a man, or both or neither. Action is not orientation. You have said that orientation is a choice.
You used these words to say it: "Being queer is a choice. Being heterosexual is natural biology and human nature." You also said: " I said being GAY IS A CHOICE. Being heterosexual is not a choice."
The problem with this theory is that you say if there are only two options, only one is a choice. That's like saying you can either stay in bed or get out of bed, but staying in bed is a choice, while getting out of bed is the natural order of things.
That is a complete failure of logic.
If being homosexual is a "choice", how is being heterosexual "nature"? TWO options. If one is by choice then the other must ALSO be choice. Welcome to logic.

Now, are you willing yet to answer MY questions directly and without ad-hominem, strawmen, red-herrings, backpedaling, obfuscation, diversion, any of your usual other tactics to avoid?

You said homosexuality is a choice. Period. "Being queer is a choice. Being heterosexual is natural biology and human nature." You also said: " I said being GAY IS A CHOICE. Being heterosexual is not a choice." "Homosexuality IS a choice." "To be gay is a choice."
Why did you choose heterosexual sexuality over homosexual sexuality?

You intimated that the organs we are born with determine whether we should choose homosexual sex or heterosexual sex."My body is designed biologically to reproduce with a female. Any other choice is a perversion."
What factor determines the choice when a person is born with both sets of organs, or none at all?

You said sex is ONLY for reproduction. period. "Sex for humans IS for reproduction. Period." "Any deviation from this is a perversion of sex."
Why do people who are biologically unable to reproduce from birth have sex?
Why do women have an orgasm if it has NOTHING to do with the process of reproduction?

 

[ThxOne]

A question that has no relevance to your theory that people choose their sexual orientation, but (a direct answer to one of your dumbest questions yet): NO ONE chooses what organs they are born with, or without (which actually happens).

So it is NOT a choice what sex organs we are born with. Good, glad we agree, we DO NOT CHOOSE HOW WE ARE BORN.

A direct answer to your question: The rolE you play in reproduction depends on if you are born with the ability to produce sperm, and further with the ability to get that sperm all the way to the female ovum.
If you are born without the capability to fertilize that ovum, then you play no rolE in reproduction.

Why are you adding shit to my question and then avoiding the answer to my question. Answer the question how it is written. Stop adding what if's and your own dipshit spins. I am assuming this is one of those questions that will shatter your B.S.

A direct answer to your question: YES, any action you personally take is by choice, whether it is to have sex with a woman or a man, or both or neither. Action is not orientation. You have said that orientation is a choice.
You used these words to say it: "Being queer is a choice. Being heterosexual is natural biology and human nature." You also said: " I said being GAY IS A CHOICE. Being heterosexual is not a choice."
The problem with this theory is that you say if there are only two options, only one is a choice. That's like saying you can either stay in bed or get out of bed, but staying in bed is a choice, while getting out of bed is the natural order of things.
That is a complete failure of logic.
If being homosexual is a "choice", how is being heterosexual "nature"? TWO options. If one is by choice then the other must ALSO be choice. Welcome to logic.

Totally unnecessary. The answer is yes. It is a choice.

Now, are you willing yet to answer MY questions directly and without ad-hominem, strawmen, red-herrings, backpedaling, obfuscation, diversion, any of your usual other tactics to avoid?

Oh, you mean like how you just answered my questions? Why do you get to add a bunch of fluff but I can't?

You said homosexuality is a choice. Period. "Being queer is a choice. Being heterosexual is natural biology and human nature." You also said: " I said being GAY IS A CHOICE. Being heterosexual is not a choice." "Homosexuality IS a choice." "To be gay is a choice."
Why did you choose heterosexual sexuality over homosexual sexuality?

So, you want me to repeat myself. I was born with my biological roll already determined. No choice needed. If I decided to phuck men, I would be choosing to be gay. A perversion of sex.

You intimated that the organs we are born with determine whether we should choose homosexual sex or heterosexual sex."My body is designed biologically to reproduce with a female. Any other choice is a perversion."
What factor determines the choice when a person is born with both sets of organs, or none at all?

For like the fifth time, this is irrelevant. These are an insignificant number of the world population and are mutations.

You said sex is ONLY for reproduction. period. "Sex for humans IS for reproduction. Period." "Any deviation from this is a perversion of sex."
Why do people who are biologically unable to reproduce from birth have sex?

Proof you don't read shit. I answered this twice and you ignored it twice. For pleasure moron, a perversion of sex. That is the third time I have answered that question. Phucking pay attention.

Why do women have an orgasm if it has NOTHING to do with the process of reproduction?

Again, I answered, you ignored. Why did you ignore it? Because you think that the female orgasm has NOTHING to do with the process of reproduction. This is false and there are studies that show it stimulates ovulation in the female. As I said before, go educate yourself.

“Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive and Dodge.” I wish I had a wrench to throw at you.

 

[RobGMN]

So it is NOT a choice what sex organs we are born with. Good, glad we agree, we DO NOT CHOOSE HOW WE ARE BORN.

Why are you adding shit to my question and then avoiding the answer to my question. Answer the question how it is written. Stop adding what if's and your own dipshit spins. I am assuming this is one of those questions that will shatter your B.S.

Totally unnecessary. The answer is yes. It is a choice.

Oh, you mean like how you just answered my questions? Why do you get to add a bunch of fluff but I can't?

So, you want me to repeat myself. I was born with my biological roll already determined. No choice needed. If I decided to phuck men, I would be choosing to be gay. A perversion of sex.

You didn't answer the question. I did not ask what your body is capable of for reproduction. becasue YOU declared sexual orientation is a choice, I asked: Why did you choose heterosexual sexuality over homosexual sexuality?

For like the fifth time, this is irrelevant. These are an insignificant number of the world population and are mutations.

if they exist, then they are relevant. If there is ONE and only ONE of an item that exists on the planet, you cannot say "the item does not exist". If you are going to declare that sexual orientation is based on the organs that someone is born with, then you must explain what happens when someone is born without sex organs BECAUSE IT HAPPENS, no matter how rare it is. Just because something is an anomaly, does not mean it does not exist.
So, once again: What factor determines the choice of sexual orientation when a person is born with both sets of sex organs, or none at all?

Proof you don't read shit. I answered this twice and you ignored it twice. For pleasure moron, a perversion of sex. That is the third time I have answered that question. Phucking pay attention.

You didn't answer the question. You proclaimed sex is only for reproduction. Were that true, then people who cannot reprdoduce would not be able to have sex. So I'll try again: Why do people who are biologically unable to reproduce from birth have sex?

Again, I answered, you ignored. Why did you ignore it? Because you think that the female orgasm has NOTHING to do with the process of reproduction. This is false and there are studies that show it stimulates ovulation in the female. As I said before, go educate yourself.

“Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive and Dodge.” I wish I had a wrench to throw at you.

You didn't answer the question. You made a statement of feelings or opinion that is not based in fact, declared there are "studies" that prove your feelings, then failed to show the studies. Some nonsense about orgasm causing ovulation. So I'll ask yet again: Why do women have an orgasm if it has NOTHING to do with the process of reproduction?

Answer the questions directly. Don't dodge, duck, dive, dip, backpedal, obfuscate, toss red-herrings or strawmen, launch ad-hominem, attempt to redirect or cloud the issue. Just answer the questions directly.
Are you wholly unable to answer even the SIMPLEST challenges to your feelings or theories?
Seriously? NOTHING to support what you say?

 

[ThxOne]

You didn't answer the question. I did not ask what your body is capable of for reproduction. becasue YOU declared sexual orientation is a choice, I asked: Why did you choose heterosexual sexuality over homosexual sexuality?

if they exist, then they are relevant. If there is ONE and only ONE of an item that exists on the planet, you cannot say "the item does not exist". If you are going to declare that sexual orientation is based on the organs that someone is born with, then you must explain what happens when someone is born without sex organs BECAUSE IT HAPPENS, no matter how rare it is. Just because something is an anomaly, does not mean it does not exist.
So, once again: What factor determines the choice of sexual orientation when a person is born with both sets of sex organs, or none at all?

You didn't answer the question. You proclaimed sex is only for reproduction. Were that true, then people who cannot reprdoduce would not be able to have sex. So I'll try again: Why do people who are biologically unable to reproduce from birth have sex?

You didn't answer the question. You made a statement of feelings or opinion that is not based in fact, declared there are "studies" that prove your feelings, then failed to show the studies. Some nonsense about orgasm causing ovulation. So I'll ask yet again: Why do women have an orgasm if it has NOTHING to do with the process of reproduction?

Answer the questions directly. Don't dodge, duck, dive, dip, backpedal, obfuscate, toss red-herrings or strawmen, launch ad-hominem, attempt to redirect or cloud the issue. Just answer the questions directly.
Are you wholly unable to answer even the SIMPLEST challenges to your feelings or theories?
Seriously? NOTHING to support what you say?

God damn. You are a fucking moron. I answered your questions. Is this what you do? Ask questions over and over then claim people didn't answer them? Then you will spin little bits of your questions, change some words to alter what you ask so that it supports your bullshit in your own deranged mind? You are dumb, just stupid. Go eat some paint chips.