Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
44640
 
Clinton went to Epstein’s island like 26+ times, Trump flew on Epstein’s plane once but it wasn’t to his island and separated himself from Epstein a long time ago, those two peoples interactions with Epstein are quite different.

Bill Gates worked with Epstein after his initial *** conviction with MIT and his cloning shit at his NM ranch.

I didn't realize Trump had only been with Epstein once. Those lying MSM fukwads and even Trump himself had led me to believe it was otherwise.
 
Clinton was quiet about his ****** addiction/deviancy. A man so embolden by his position as President that he thought he could have a woman blow him in the Oval Office and no one would know. A man who holds such a position needs to be ethical and moral. He was neither and that was proven by the cum stains. He is married too. You gonna tell me a man that would do these acts in the Oval Office wouldn't go indulge himself on PedoIsland? Come on man, he went there REGULARLY!! Clinton hid that shit, Trump bragged about grabbing a WOMAN'S pussy. He didn't pound some kids on a private island or get blow jobs in the Oval Office.

This has to be one of the funniest posts I've ever read.....

1) Clinton's "*** addition" was well known and most people understood he had an open relationship with Hillary.
2) The POTUS needs to be ethical and moral - that's a riot. Hasn't happened and never will. Would it be safe to assume you did not vote for Trump due to ethical and moral shortcomings.
3) Trump and Epstein partied together for decades.
 
Defnitle


1. Democrats pay the bills for the country.
2. Democrats outnumber Republicans.
3. The economy has been better under Democrat presidents for half a century.

You enjoy being on the losing side, huh?
View attachment 44645

View attachment 44646

View attachment 44648
View attachment 44647

I once charted spending Dems vs GOP using the presidency if the party didn't have control of one or both parties of congress. Two patterns emerged as either party consolidated power by controlling the WH + 1 or more branches of congress, deficit spending would increase. The republicans (despite their rhetoric) were much with the deficit spending. The ironic part - it was the GOP that would increase spending on "human services" the most. Kinda explains that graph of dollars paid vs dollars received.
 
I once charted spending Dems vs GOP using the presidency if the party didn't have control of one or both parties of congress. Two patterns emerged as either party consolidated power by controlling the WH + 1 or more branches of congress, deficit spending would increase. The republicans (despite their rhetoric) were much with the deficit spending. The ironic part - it was the GOP that would increase spending on "human services" the most. Kinda explains that graph of dollars paid vs dollars received.
How long before someone chimes in with a claim that the numbers are all bullshit/faked and that the Democrats have ruined the economy, or that it's only good for them because the Republicans set it up for success before leaving office?

Yeah. People bitching that Democrats are only voting Dem because of loan forgiveness or welfare. Drive through farm country. Tell me how many "vote Republican" signs you see. What party is so very strong on subsidies to keep farms profitable?

It's funny how people don't see their own reality while bitching about others' realities.
 
How long before someone chimes in with a claim that the numbers are all bullshit/faked and that the Democrats have ruined the economy, or that it's only good for them because the Republicans set it up for success before leaving office?

Yeah. People bitching that Democrats are only voting Dem because of loan forgiveness or welfare. Drive through farm country. Tell me how many "vote Republican" signs you see. What party is so very strong on subsidies to keep farms profitable?

It's funny how people don't see their own reality while bitching about others' realities.

We didn't rack up a $31trillion debt without some help from the GOP. The (supposed) deficit hawks were awfully quiet while Trump rang up record deficits, but they are raising hell over Sleepy Joe's deficits.
 


Has this @$$ hat ever been in a Hooters? Awful food, awful service and young women acting like bimbos. Plus orange pool tables??? I guess I can see why neo-conservatives might like all the orange, but as a pool player, I find orange pool tables (and overpriced bad bar food) downright offensive. WTF would I take my kids there???
 
So the GOP is at interesting cross roads. Generally the parties have a moderate figure head and voice of reason - for the GOP it used to be McCain and now it's Romney. In McCain's case, he was well respected by the GOP, but in Romney's case not so much. Then you used to have the far right of the party - think Mitch McConnell & Lindsey Graham. The party existed between these "extremes" This was a good system as you had McCain who could appeal to the center, work with Dems and keep the party from going off the rails. OTOH, the GOP needs folks like Lindsey Graham to appeal to the hardcore neo-cons who won't give an inch on abortion, would outlaw ghey marriage and could really care less about minority rights, etc.

But now the GOP is in weird place. They discovered this rather large conspiracy theory voting block and it's a substantial voting block - probably more substantial than the black or lgbtqxyz voting block and I'd venture to say as substantial as the black & lgbtqxyz blocks combined. In essence this makes Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell the GOP's "middle men." And the GOP now has to embrace the Marjorie Taylor Greenes and Lauren Boberts to satisfy the "Q" portion of their base. So if hardline conservatives are now the "center" of the party, that's a pretty big swing to the right. And this has been brewing for a while (ie Tea Party & Alex Jones), so it's not just some passing fancy. Can a party survive when ~half it's base believes in a fantasy (Qanon) or will that destroy, fracture or diminish the party?
 
This has to be one of the funniest posts I've ever read.....

1) Clinton's "*** addition" was well known and most people understood he had an open relationship with Hillary.
2) The POTUS needs to be ethical and moral - that's a riot. Hasn't happened and never will. Would it be safe to assume you did not vote for Trump due to ethical and moral shortcomings.
3) Trump and Epstein partied together for decades.
I know. I was being ironical.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,118,834
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top