Winners only.

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Isn't it funny how the "proof of the steal" that is being put up in various places is conveniently very blurry, or provides limited information that could be used to make a judgement?

Why would "proof" not be very clear and very descriptive? Seems fishy to me.
"Ignore the man behind the curtain. Nothing to see here"

The proof isn't clear for one of two reasons:
1) There is no proof.
2) The perpetrators (Clintons, Gates, Soros, Biden, et al) did such a masterful job they left no trace of their crime. Even the almighty Trump is unable to uncover their wrong doings.

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

View attachment 44598

If it's all rigged, then every Republican win was due to fraud. Right?
Good play. Dopey.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I believe it... Biden did "win"

In quotes because no Democrat could ever "win" when there are more Democrat voters than Republican voters?

So with all elections being rigged, the Republicans just **** so bad at cheating that they STILL lose, even when outnumbered.
Got it.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

In quotes because no Democrat could ever "win" when there are more Democrat voters than Republican voters?

So with all elections being rigged, the Republicans just **** so bad at cheating that they STILL lose, even when outnumbered.
Got it.

You love being dramatic don't you?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

As promised in a past previous post, a quick breakdown of Tautology and it's proper usage.

Tautology seems to get used on the board as some sort of antonym of irony, which is not. It's listed as a synonym for repetitiveness, but that lacks proper context. For example, Trump was not being tautological when he claimed thousands of times that the election was going to be or was stolen, but he was definitely repetitive.

Tautology would be better thought of as synonymous to verbose or wordy (see my posts). Tautology is using words/phrases that have same/similar meaning when it's not necessary - a stylistic error. For example, in a past previous post.... The easy way to identify tautology vs repetitiveness is base it on need. I could have said in a past post or in a previous post and the meaning isn't altered, so I'm using an unnecessary word.

OTOH, when Trump repeats over and over that the election was stolen, it's politically necessary. He's pounding his message home over and over and over again. Another example, of repetitiveness vs tautology would be how I just used "over and over and over again" which is not a tautology, but a stylistic choice (not a stylistic fault) to demonstrate how repetitive Trump's message has been. Trump's repetition serves a purpose: he's staying on message, delegitimizing Biden's presidency, it's a way to measure loyalty to Trump, etc. If Trump were to stop repeating the "Big Lie," people would wonder if he's moved on, how would I differentiate from a McConnell republican vs a Trump republican, etc.

So in conclusion, when one is repetitive, they are not necessarily being tautologic.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

In quotes because no Democrat could ever "win" when there are more Democrat voters than Republican voters?

So with all elections being rigged, the Republicans just **** so bad at cheating that they STILL lose, even when outnumbered.
Got it.

But what if there more GOP voters than DNC and the pollsters and voting rolls are just part of the big cover up??? The fact that a Dem is elected anywhere outside of California, NY, Washington, Oregon and Massachusetts is highly suspect. Realistically, The House should be ~400 GOP vs ~100 DNC and ~90/10 in the Senate. Biden's election is a statistical impossibility.

https://alicefeng.github.io/red-blue-america/

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

But what if there more GOP voters than DNC and the pollsters and voting rolls are just part of the big cover up??? The fact that a Dem is elected anywhere outside of California, NY, Washington, Oregon and Massachusetts is highly suspect. Realistically, The House should be ~400 GOP vs ~100 DNC and ~90/10 in the Senate. Biden's election is a statistical impossibility.

https://alicefeng.github.io/red-blue-america/

It's all rigged.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

It's all rigged.

Odd that it's Maricopa county having so many issues...

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]