I don't think that the XXX has more cone area than the Brahma. I think they both use the same surround just RE specs their SD different IIRC.I chose my xxx 15 over a brahma 15 because....1)has more cone area
2)it's more linear
that does not make my XXX any better than a brahma,brahma has it's advantages too....
1)lighter moving mass
2)lighter sub
In my eye's I would use the brahma for a daily driver
both are xbl2, have extemely strong low, end and SQ,my EDA15.22 AE has nothing on my XXX 15 low end I MEAN NOTHING,ported or sealed.
just wanted to drop some poinions and facts.
What if you owned an El Camino?I don't think that the XXX has more cone area than the Brahma. I think they both use the same surround just RE specs their SD different IIRC.
I would choose the XXX for looks only because I have a van but if I had a car I would get the Brahmas.
I don't know if I would even put subs in there. I wouldn't get a EL Camino anyway LOL.What if you owned an El Camino?
yes it would change the performance. plus, why in the world would you buy two woofers, and destroy them both so that you can have one look different? if it is that much of an issue invert the **** thing and call it a day.hmmm...since the xxx and brahma share the same surround. is it possible to remove the dust cap of the brahma and replace with the inverted dust cap of the xxx? would it alter the performance of a brahma to an audible level? because it would be pretty nice to have the performance of the brahma with the looks of an xxx.