Yeah, I see that definition. When you look at history though, and who created racism, it was white people. You can track the creation of "whiteness" and "race" since the induction of slavery, which is why I choose an inheritly biased standpoint in my definition. I do believe race was created by white people, for the benefit of white people.
Slavery hardly marks the start or creation of racism. Take a history class. Slavery existed LONG before the European conquest of Africa. Slavery existed in various forms in Greece, Spain, and Italy long before Africans were used as slaves.
It was a relatively common feature of most feudal systems. It is fair to state that racism was elaborated to help justify it in an increasingly capitalist society however.
Since the beginning of recorded human history, you can see evidence of the creation of various "us versus them" divisions and skin color is the simplest and most obvious one to use.
Again, I'm not arguing in favour of racism in ANY way, I'm just pointing out that your historical and social arguments are a little off.
Also, Flipx99, I've having trouble understanding what you're asking. Is it something like "What if you believe there's a difference, but nothing that creates a heirarchy?" Math has nothing to do with it. If there's something worthy (in your eyes) of creating a difference, it is rarely the case that this divisive action is going to entirely benevolent. Odds are, it'll manifest itself as something negative, ie - one group is better or worse than another.
And, finally, Flipx99, your stance on affirmative action is, in my opinion uninformed. I don't believe that it's racism. It's not designed to necessarily put historically disadvantaged groups in a dominant position. It's design is to help level the playing field. Again, this is a Rawlsian sort of justice, based on the Difference Principle. In short, "Social and economic inequalities are to satisfy two conditions: (a) They are to be attached to positions and offices open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity; and (b), they are to be to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged members of society. "
It's a form of distributive justice, easily the most dominant justice paradigm in the United States in the last 30 years.