which amp to use with ctx65cs

any detriment to bridging these 4 channel amps to run 2 channels? seems to be a lot more power available for less cost when compared to 2 channel amps (mainly looking at the MB -Discus amps). are these amps any good?

 
any detriment to bridging these 4 channel amps to run 2 channels? seems to be a lot more power available for less cost when compared to 2 channel amps (mainly looking at the MB -Discus amps). are these amps any good?
No. Gives you more overhead for musical peaks.

Just set your gains correctly. I prefer 4 channel amps, more flexibility and value, IMO.

 
any detriment to bridging these 4 channel amps to run 2 channels? seems to be a lot more power available for less cost when compared to 2 channel amps (mainly looking at the MB -Discus amps). are these amps any good?
Curious. I see what you mean (data pulled from woofersetc):

DSC450

Retail: $344.99

Price: $100.99

50x4 @ 4ohm

100x4 @ 2ohm

200x2 @ 4ohm

DSC480

Retail: $444.99

Price: $139.99

80x4 @ 4ohm

160x4 @ 2ohm

320x2 @ 4ohm

DSC2150

Retail: $449.99

Price: $209.99

150x2 @ 4ohm

300x2 @ 2ohm

NAU-460 (Marine Grade)

Retail: $349.99

Price: $129.99

60x4 @ 4ohm

90x4 @ 2ohm

180x2 @ 4ohm

If you were limiting your choices to only MB Quart amps, it looks like the only reason to go with the 2-channel version is if you have 2ohm drivers that need more than 160w. The only reason for this pricing must be that people are afraid of bridging, or maybe everyone is willing to pay more for the 2-channel because the install will look more elegant?

EDIT: Maybe this is just a fluke with woofersetc pricing. The DSC2150 is $115 shipped all over ebay.

 
i'm not stuck on the MB discus amps or any other amp for that matter, just happened to be looking at them at the time... i'll have to keep looking around to see if this "4 channel bridged > 2 channel" stuff happens elsewhere.

 
OP, what did you wind up doing?
Got the Discuss from SicAudio, http://www.woofersetc.com/p6840/DSC2150-MB-Quart-2-Ch-600-Watt-Amplifier.htm i have no other amps/speakers to compare with, but i am 110% super sadisfied with how they sound. crystal clear!

what determines how much watts im sending to the speakers? is it just in the volume? or is the amp always sending a certain amount of wattage to the speakers? or do all the settings have to bel all the way up plus volume??

i turned all the setting 1/5th- 1/4th the way up. and if i turn volume up, i believe i would go deaf before they start to distort, the mids and tweets are ear peircing!

 
Its funny ive had subs for 8 years, i first started out wanting something that just thumped.. i had one 18" then 2 year later i had two 12"audio bahns. then i wanted a shorter crisper bass. so i got two 10" Alpine type-R in a small .68 closed box.

and now i still want tighter crisper bass. so i think i might sell the two 10"s and get four 8"s

 
herrrerrera

its not the woofers size.. you like over damped alignments and woofers.. find something with a high fs and low Qt.. right off hand im sure you would like CDTs drivers as well as DD drivers(ported).. ive had 4 channel amps bridged and 2 channels 4ohm stereo and i find the 2 channel option is worth the extra doe. the SD i have does a clean 120x4@4ohm... you could also look into the arc audio FD http://www.woofersetc.com/p6856/FD-2200--ARC-Audio-2-Channel-370-Watt-Amplifier.htm for the money there great...

http://www.woofersetc.com/p8423/QES1220-Orange--CDT-Audio-12"-Cast-Audiophile-Excursion-Subwoofer.htm

http://www.woofersetc.com/p6718/QES1220--CDT-Audio-12"-Cast-Audiophile-Excursion-Subwoofer.htm

 
Waiting on my comp set in the mail, but i just picked up a kenwood kac-7204 to power them... anyone use this amp with these comps??... rated at 170x2 @ 4 ohms i figure it should be a good match

 
definitely, that amp will have plenty of power! I don't know anything else about it, like signal to noise ratio or THD, but 170x2 is plenty.

I have a set of ctx65cs on the way as well. i am gonna run them off an old phoenix gold that does 50x4@4, 75x4@2, bridged to 150x2@4. the amp itself is in rough shape, and pretty **** big, so I've been looking for something a bit nicer and smaller.

obtw I just scored a jbl bp1200.1 from these forums for $150 shipped. I'm using it with an an idq12v3d4. it sounds, uhh, "omg awesome". I can't wait for the components to come..

 
Last edited by a moderator:
definitely, that amp will have plenty of power! I don't know anything else about it, like signal to noise ratio or THD, but 170x2 is plenty.
I have a set of ctx65cs on the way as well. i am gonna run them off an old phoenix gold that does 75x4@4, bridged to 150x2@4. the amp itself is in rough shape, and pretty **** big, so I've been looking for something a bit nicer and smaller.

obtw I just scored a jbl bp1200.1 from these forums for $150 shipped. I'm using it with an an idq12v3d4. it sounds, uhh, "omg awesome". I can't wait for the components to come..
Signal-to-Noise Ratio 83 dB

THD at Rated RMS Power 0.8%

 
that is ok, but certainly not the best. my PG amp has a 110dB S/N and 1% THD, so its better at one thing and worse at the other.

You should be able to hear the difference from 80dB to 100dB, but S/N ratios over 100dB will be very hard to discriminate.

Anything under 1% THD is generally accepted as "decent"; fwiw the MB Quart DSC2150 is rated 0.05% THD & 92dB S/N

From wikipedia:

Signal-to-noise ratio (often abbreviated SNR or S/N) is ameasurement of the ratio of a signal power to the noise power corrupting the signal. A ratio higher than 1:1 indicates more signal than noise. In less technical terms, signal-to-noise ratio compares the level of a desired signal (such as music) to the level of background noise. The higher the ratio, the less obtrusive the background noise is.

The total harmonic distortion, or THD, of a signal is a measurement of the harmonic distortion present and is defined as the ratio of the sum of the powers of all harmonic components to the power of the fundamental frequency. Lesser THD allows the components in a loudspeaker, amplifier or microphone or other equipment to produce a more accurate reproduction by reducing harmonics added by electronics and audio media.

 
Waiting on my comp set in the mail, but i just picked up a kenwood kac-7204 to power them... anyone use this amp with these comps??... rated at 170x2 @ 4 ohms i figure it should be a good match
you shouldnt of bought a kenwood amp //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

they are horrible. ive owned one will never buy another in my life.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Similar threads

No need to bypass the amp. Most use an LOC that takes the full amped signal and turns it into a flat RCA level signal. Here is the newest I have...
2
102
It would also be easy to add an equalizer to have individual rca inputs for all of the channels. A decent one can be had for less than $40...
6
351
  • Locked
NVX MVPA1 Best tiny amp Installed a bunch, but have one pushing a sealed 12 @ 2ohm in my daily beater Can bump it all day long and barely gets...
4
652
Amp
This tested well on youtube - not familiar with the brand but it is a pretty standard china build house amplifier...
5
476

About this thread

herrrerrera

10+ year member
Junior Member
Thread starter
herrrerrera
Joined
Location
pomona, ca
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
48
Views
4,353
Last reply date
Last reply from
Maglite
Screenshot_20240531-022053.png

1aespinoza

    May 31, 2024
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20240524_202505_Samsung Internet.jpg

winkychevelle

    May 24, 2024
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top