I dont really see what the big deal is with people being against having an asian car. Some of the people who are full force against ever having something that was designed by an asian designer (or even an n.a. designer employed by an asian car company) , HAVENT EVEN OWNED A ASIAN CAR!
Some people I know are always talking about domestics. They think that asian cars are way bad. My friend is getting a car soon, and she said that all asian car companys make $#!%%! cars. This other person I know says that a nissan skyline is gutless? I mean, is there some magical force that changes when you switch from an asian car, to a canadian or american car? Why cant asian cars be good, is it because they bring in the new year at a different time, their large exportation is rice when ours is wheat or something? Is it because they consider what the roads are like in japan aswell as what road conditions are like america (rather then being full-fledged american patriots)?
This I guess is expected from people: racism, patriotism, that sort of thing that can make someone mislead another person about the exports or designs made by someone from a different country or continent.
-p.s. I do believe this is racism, after all, what is a "tricked out" asian car called? rice......and what about a "tricked out" n.a. car called? domestic RICE..... so any vehicle that has a body kit on it, a wing and a couple stickers but doesnt have $3000 invested into the engine, is blamed on asia/asians!
-p.s.s. That doesnt mean I blame asia/asians (because the poll says: rice, domestic rice). I just didnt have a word for a "souped up" n.a. car. Maybe since we have large exports of wheat (atleast thats one of the largest ones I know of) then we should start calling "souped up" n.a. cars wheat, wheat rockets, "hey check out that car, its wheated untastefully."