whats better overall power acoustik or rockford fosgate?

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

i know but just using something close, has anyone tested one of those T2's, i would love to see how they compare to an SX and other spl subs

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wave.gif.002382ce7d7c19757ab945cc69819de1.gif I've never heard the SX but if it is at all comparable to my XXX's output the T2 would still stomp it.

T2's are extremely loud //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 

[bamaboy 5,000+ posts]

isnt your XXX sealed? going from sealed to ported does wonders for the XXX i've heard, havnt expirenced it though, and my SX was dang loud, but a T2 also retail for like 700$ which i dont see the need in that at all

 

[94CamryBumpin 10+ year member]

Budget wise...IMO PA is better...taking that A3000DB vs T2001...based on listed power...they are comparable in most ways except price...

 

[bamaboy 5,000+ posts]

im highy sure the RF is built better and a good bit different stuff, but for the price the PA is a good amp

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

taking that A3000DB vs T2001...based on listed power...they are comparable in most ways except price...

Wrong.

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

isnt your XXX sealed? going from sealed to ported does wonders for the XXX i've heard, havnt expirenced it though, and my SX was dang loud, but a T2 also retail for like 700$ which i dont see the need in that at all.

Both. I'm running it in 2ft^3 ported to 35hz with 36 square inches of port now. Newlly built box. Louder over my 29hz with 30 square inches of port area.

Retail and actual purchase price will be different...

 

[squeak9798 5,000+ posts]

Wrong.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/word.gif.64b12e39f936af3b4fff38a1c0bd0244.gif

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif Yah My first Mod deleted post //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

 

[bamaboy 5,000+ posts]

cookie for you //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[Mackenzie 10+ year member]

This thread seems to be pretty useless. I wouldnt compare rockford to pa. They are in 2 different leagues. If I were to compare pa to something it would be like lanzar

 

[req 5,000+ posts]

rockford P1;

rockford p2;

rockford t1;

rockford t2;

now, i think we can all agree that the P1 and P2 are garbage. the other two seem to be ok, but i dont like the astheics at all. but i cant judge them versus any other brand of 'superwoofer' because i personally dont own them.

 

[squeak9798 5,000+ posts]

Why can't we go back to the old days; when the RF subs looked normal and just had a red "RF" in the middle of them, along with the model # in small white printing //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crying.gif.ec0ebefe590df0251476573bc49e46d8.gif

 

[Raffi 10+ year member]

As long as they are pushing some FUNKY PUPS subs....they are good!

 

[gnet158 10+ year member]

Yea, I’m not sure if Best Buy sells their lower end stuff but when I was looking for a ’10 sub the RF sounded like crap. Even the sales guy thought so, the Alpine R series sounded the best, but out of my price range.

 

[bamaboy 5,000+ posts]

they usually dont try to help them sound better either, and i wish bestbuy sold the T1s and T2s, does anyone know how much a T2 can actually handle? it is 1000rms but i wonder how much it can take daily, because now days 1000 watts insnt much compared to some other subs