What is?

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

And you wonder why I call your posts conspiracy theories??? Any day now "they" are going to hit the button the 5g nano particles from the vaccine are going to kill half of us like Thanos in Infinity Wars and those who survive will be subject to sterilize if they possess undesirable traits.

Ironically, I don't even mind entertaining the conspiracy theories, but let's not pretend they are anything more than what they are.

The CELL towers are not going to kill people like that; the openly stated goal is to merge humanity with machines and the internet via nanotech and brain chips. That’s not a theory; that’s what the newest science working on. It’ll be medical and entertainment based, and economy based with people making digital currency inside of digital realities like the Metaverse. 5g and the coming 6g are there to provide a high frequency enough data stream to have enough digital communications data transfer rate to send and receive all of that data from people’s bodies back and forth between the computer systems. That’s the future we are being pushed towards is hooking everyone up to the internet.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I answered the question. You are ignoring the answer. I am done.

OK. We've now rolled to the "I answered the question" reply, which is a flat-out lie. You have NEVER answered the question as to what punishment a court would hand down to ME for breaking the "law" that says *I* cannot perform job tasks for free.

What's with you (and I'll group you with others now) dipshits who make a claim, can't support the claim, then after enough posts that no one really knows what happened, say that you supported the claim?

Dishonesty like that is a really shitty personality trait.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I would bet good money at crappy odds that there are people in this group who would read this and say "YES!" and fully believe it.
Why would I accept crappy odds? Because after seeing all of the other bullshit some of y'all believe it's pretty much guaranteed that at least one nutbar WILL.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

The CELL towers are not going to kill people like that; the openly stated goal is to merge humanity with machines and the internet via nanotech and brain chips. That’s not a theory; that’s what the newest science working on. It’ll be medical and entertainment based, and economy based with people making digital currency inside of digital realities like the Metaverse. 5g and the coming 6g are there to provide a high frequency enough data stream to have enough digital communications data transfer rate to send and receive all of that data from people’s bodies back and forth between the computer systems. That’s the future we are being pushed towards is hooking everyone up to the internet.

But doesn't all fit into the eugenics and depopulation program? Have you checked with Alex Jones yet?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

But doesn't all fit into the eugenics and depopulation program? Have you checked with Alex Jones yet?

Can you prove what I’m saying is wrong? Merging nanotech with humanity is eugenics. Peak eugenics is transhumanism. They’re in labs right now working on nanotech biosensors and gene editing technology to be used live time inside of our bodies.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

OK. We've now rolled to the "I answered the question" reply, which is a flat-out lie. You have NEVER answered the question as to what punishment a court would hand down to ME for breaking the "law" that says *I* cannot perform job tasks for free.

What's with you (and I'll group you with others now) dipshits who make a claim, can't support the claim, then after enough posts that no one really knows what happened, say that you supported the claim?

Dishonesty like that is a really shitty personality trait.

Just dumb.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

OK. We've now rolled to the "I answered the question" reply, which is a flat-out lie. You have NEVER answered the question as to what punishment a court would hand down to ME for breaking the "law" that says *I* cannot perform job tasks for free.

What's with you (and I'll group you with others now) dipshits who make a claim, can't support the claim, then after enough posts that no one really knows what happened, say that you supported the claim?

Dishonesty like that is a really shitty personality trait.

Here is where I show you why you are stupid. YOU made the claim that I said the courts would punish you directly. I never made that claim. Then you hound me for an answer to a claim I never made. Show me the claim that I made that says the court will punish you directly. Oh, that's right, you can't because I never made that claim. Now, stfu and go eat something phallic in shape and stop wasting my mother fucking time.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Can you prove what I’m saying is wrong? Merging nanotech with humanity is eugenics. Peak eugenics is transhumanism. They’re in labs right now working on nanotech biosensors and gene editing technology to be used live time inside of our bodies.

Of course I can't prove a conspiracy theory is wrong. But I thought "they" were depopulating the planet with bioweapons. Now it turns out they're augmenting humans. Why are "they" augmenting humans if what they really want is to wipe us out on massive scale? That would be like me spending tons of money & time on my stereo system when my end goal is just to blow up the car anyway.

That's the problem with conspiracy theories today, they just aren't as coherent as the previous generation of conspiracy theories. Conspiracy theories need to be vague and open ended or they risk painting themselves into a corner. That's why the lizard people works well - who knows what they're up to? We just know they're up to no good.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I would bet good money at crappy odds that there are people in this group who would read this and say "YES!" and fully believe it.
Why would I accept crappy odds? Because after seeing all of the other bullshit some of y'all believe it's pretty much guaranteed that at least one nutbar WILL.

View attachment 43530

The crap these people make up and believe.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Here is where I show you why you are stupid. YOU made the claim that I said the courts would punish you directly. I never made that claim. Then you hound me for an answer to a claim I never made. Show me the claim that I made that says the court will punish you directly. Oh, that's right, you can't because I never made that claim. Now, stfu and go eat something phallic in shape and stop wasting my mother fucking time.

You claimed it was illegal for ME to do it.
If a law applies to ME, then there is a punishment the court can make me endure for breaking it.
As I said before, you don’t HAVE to type the words in order for you to have made the claim, any more than you gave to type the words “I ate beef” if you claim you had an Angus burger or “I ate cheese” if you say you had some emnentaler.

YOU incorrectly claimed I would be breaking the law, but cannot prove it by telling me a single legal punishment from the courts for breaking this “law”.
If no punishment exists, no law exists.

You were wrong, and will insist probably to your death that you were right.
A sad commentary on people like you.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Just dumb.

Another common response when fools are asked to prove their baseless claims.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You claimed it was illegal for ME to do it.
If a law applies to ME, then there is a punishment the court can make me endure for breaking it.
As I said before, you don’t HAVE to type the words in order for you to have made the claim, any more than you gave to type the words “I ate beef” if you claim you had an Angus burger or “I ate cheese” if you say you had some emnentaler.

YOU incorrectly claimed I would be breaking the law, but cannot prove it by telling me a single legal punishment from the courts for breaking this “law”.
If no punishment exists, no law exists.

You were wrong, and will insist probably to your death that you were right.
A sad commentary on people like you.

DUMB, You are just DUMB!

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Another common response when fools are asked to prove their baseless claims.

You know how a 10 year old can go and damage someones property, which is an illegal act, and the parent's are responsible for paying the penalty of their 10 year old breaking the law? Same fucking thing you douche bag piece of shit. Your employer is responsible for YOUR ACTIONS. Now fuck off idiot.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You know how a 10 year old can go and damage someones property, which is an illegal act, and the parent's are responsible for paying the penalty of their 10 year old breaking the law? Same fucking thing you douche bag piece of shit. Your employer is responsible for YOUR ACTIONS. Now fuck off idiot.

Wow, you are really triggered about your failure to prove your claim, huh?
Sorry, but telling me to "fvck off" and resorting to ad hominem attacks makes your argument no stronger. In fact, it just makes it look even weaker.

Nullum crimen sine lege. "There is no penalty without law".
There is no crime without law. If there is no punishment, then there is no crime.

Your analogy is false. The child can be punished by the courts, and it happens all the time, regardless of whether the parents have to assume financial responsibility for their offspring. Some kids as young as 8 have been tried and convicted as adults, and kids can be punished with things like detention in the home, placement out of the home, community service, probation, chemical dependency treatment, loss of license privilege, incarceration in "juvie", etc.

Unless of course you think mom and dad serve out all of the punishments on behalf of their children? If so, your thinking would be wrong.

So, what could my court-mandated punishment be for working for no pay?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Wow, you are really triggered about your failure to prove your claim, huh?
Sorry, but telling me to "fvck off" and resorting to ad hominem attacks makes your argument no stronger. In fact, it just makes it look even weaker.

Nullum crimen sine lege. "There is no penalty without law".
There is no crime without law. If there is no punishment, then there is no crime.

Your analogy is false. The child can be punished by the courts, and it happens all the time, regardless of whether the parents have to assume financial responsibility for their offspring. Some kids as young as 8 have been tried and convicted as adults, and kids can be punished with things like detention in the home, placement out of the home, community service, probation, chemical dependency treatment, loss of license privilege, incarceration in "juvie", etc.

Unless of course you think mom and dad serve out all of the punishments on behalf of their children? If so, your thinking would be wrong.

So, what could my court-mandated punishment be for working for no pay?

Again, proof you just want to argue about anything and everything. You are arguing with me about this shit. I don't make the labor laws but that does not mean they are not there. They are for sure there no matter how much you posture on this forum you dickless idiot. Go tell your HR department that you work off the clock you cowardly cunt. Now, for the last time, fuck off.