Want to know the truth behind audiophiles? I will explain!

You paid $40 for those tweets, you got ripped //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif hahahahah just messin with ya.
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif Don't make fun of me; I can hear the woodiness of violins when switching out my interconnects. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/tongue.gif.6130eb82179565f6db8d26d6001dcd24.gif
 
I would imagine hearing a paino in person is worlds apart from hearing it in a recording. And different instruments do sound different than each other. Hell, three violins in a row tuned the same will still end up sounding slightly different than each other. Nature of the beast. Wood, strings, hammers*piano* are all succeptable to tolerances, temperature, and moisture.

 
I would imagine hearing a paino in person is worlds apart from hearing it in a recording. And different instruments do sound different than each other. Hell, three violins in a row tuned the same will still end up sounding slightly different than each other. Nature of the beast. Wood, strings, hammers*piano* are all succeptable to tolerances, temperature, and moisture.
Exactly! If that's the case, how is it that these $2400 stereo pair speaker cables can make even the best Steinway sound better (which cannot be the best anyway, because like speakers, it is impossible to to cross the perfect reproduction "asymptote") than it actually is? Sound quality isn't subjective; how good it sounds to you is.http://www.sixmoons.com/audioreviews/cardas/cardas.html

 
helical triad of quad-axial planetary arrays of golden ratio,
What the **** does that even mean?
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif You reading that one too? I started laughing uncontrollably when I read that the cables, being designed around Phi, actually sounded better than anything else he's heard. For the money, of course. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
 
This right here ended my time on 6moons.

I have never auditioned a cable set that took as long to break in and settle down as the Golden Reference. In fact, while listening by the light of 2A3 tubes in the dark of night, I noticed an ominous red '666' glowing on the cables' jackets. It took eight weeks for things to settle down and start sounding good and playing music well. One by one, each glowing red 6 was replaced with a softly glowing green 7 to finally signal the '777' of Divine completion at the end of the lengthy settling-in period. Be patient if you experience the same. Audio cables really do need to break in before you'll hear them at their best. My first impression of the unbroken-in Cardas cables were not positive: The melodic and rhythmic lines seemed disjointed and out of whack, screwing up the system's ability to make musical sense. The strings had a harsh, unnatural metallic tinge. There was so much detail evident that it was distracting me from the music. The nastiness disappeared after eight weeks of breaking in: Melody and rhythm lined up, the harsh metallic tinge on strings disappeared and the detail remained but now made musical sense.
That's enough for me. Metal strings that sound metallic...you've got to be shitting me.

 
What the hell was he talking about with the 666 turning into 777? Did the manufacturer really print 666 on the cable?
That's exactly the point, no one knows, and no one cares but him. The fact that the 2A3 tube was so important to the cable's functionality is what defiles the article in the first place. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
 
Are you shitting me? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wow.gif.23d729408e9177caa2a0ed6a2ba6588e.gif Nikes versus speakers? Loudspeaker technology hasn't changed much in the past 50 years, to be quite honest. You build an enclosure, that is sonically dead, pick good drivers and filters, and input power. That's the gist of it. You can get creative with various alignments and what not, but there is no R&D going into an enclosure that DOES WHAT IT'S SUPPOSED TO DO. Seriously, did you read the article? I own 6 of the **** tweeters in the project, and they cost 40 bucks each. No rudimentary loudspeaker is worth 8k, no where even close. I want to pay for something special, not drivers I can buy anywhere, nor some exotic (maple is exotic by the way) veneer that adds nothing to the cabinet.
If you looking at shoes the way you look at speakers shoes haven't changed that much either.

Pick a good sole material, get some good leather for the top, sew them together, get some laces you like, and a decent pad on the inside and wallah you have a shoe. Sort of like you would have a speaker. But, I am sure there is more that goes into a shoe as there is more than goes into a speaker, which would require R&D. Unless you are a speaker company like this one, or most.

Speakers like these piss me off, they give all prebuilt speakers a bad wrap and sound like shit while doing it.

 
If you looking at shoes the way you look at speakers shoes haven't changed that much either.
Pick a good sole material, get some good leather for the top, sew them together, get some laces you like, and a decent pad on the inside and wallah you have a shoe. Sort of like you would have a speaker. But, I am sure there is more that goes into a shoe as there is more than goes into a speaker, which would require R&D. Unless you are a speaker company like this one, or most.

Speakers like these piss me off, they give all prebuilt speakers a bad wrap and sound like shit while doing it.
Of course, everything is simple in design. You can improve upon a product to to a point. Like I said, it's above that point you pay for useless shit such as "materials", "technology" and "preference". The same applies to shoes. I have I think 7 pairs of shoes: Asics running shoes, Adidas tennis shoes, Adidas every day shoes, some dress shoes and two pairs of boxing boots.
The materials in these instances make all the difference. A hard leather dress shoe wouldn't be very conducive to going 10 rounds, much like a high support running shoe with cushioning inserts is more practical than flat soled tennis shoes when doing roadwork.

Speakers, however, don't really benefit much beyond standard building materials and technology. The current knowledge about how to build the ideal loudspeaker has been uncovered so far, and audiophile companies do nothing to give anything new to the field. Rather, they take that knowledge, seldom apply it, give the cabinets some fancy looking bits and baffles and call it a XR29 or something else "technical" sounding.

The people making advances in loudspeaker technology aren't the guys building the speakers that look cool, but the ones in the garage testing out things that may not look great, but sure as hell sound better than Wilson puppy speakers with god-awful diffraction.

 
Of course, everything is simple in design. You can improve upon a product to to a point. Like I said, it's above that point you pay for useless shit such as "materials", "technology" and "preference". The same applies to shoes. I have I think 7 pairs of shoes: Asics running shoes, Adidas tennis shoes, Adidas every day shoes, some dress shoes and two pairs of boxing boots.
The materials in these instances make all the difference. A hard leather dress shoe wouldn't be very conducive to going 10 rounds, much like a high support running shoe with cushioning inserts is more practical than flat soled tennis shoes when doing roadwork.

Speakers, however, don't really benefit much beyond standard building materials and technology. The current knowledge about how to build the ideal loudspeaker has been uncovered so far, and audiophile companies do nothing to give anything new to the field. Rather, they take that knowledge, seldom apply it, give the cabinets some fancy looking bits and baffles and call it a XR29 or something else "technical" sounding.

The people making advances in loudspeaker technology aren't the guys building the speakers that look cool, but the ones in the garage testing out things that may not look great, but sure as hell sound better than Wilson puppy speakers with god-awful diffraction.
Well a agree and disagree with you.

A lot of companies do behave the way you say they do, but there are some exceptions. But, you are right most just give something old a fancy name and call it a day.

 
It's called business. If people will buy it then someone will sell it. But I disagree with your attitude towards audio R&D. While many companies simply build upon what has been uncovered so far, obviously there has been plenty of technological progress over the years that has been funded by some kind of financial incentive. Hell even BOSE can be considered innovative in many respects, even if their products are ridiculously overpriced. To be fair, and I'm speaking as a DIY'er myself, most DIY'ers copy the companies instead of the other way around. They just do it for cheaper.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

PV Audio

5,000+ posts
The Vision of Sound
Thread starter
PV Audio
Joined
Location
Indy
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
37
Views
2,967
Last reply date
Last reply from
thylantyr
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top