its all lobbying and money as usual, this time they just have the tree huggin hippies on their sideGet this Pelosi bought stock in Clean Energy Corp in August of 2007 and this bill is making the stock of this company sky rocket.
if it ever kicks in it will be historic that i will bet money on. He wants too much control and wants old people to eat pain killersis this the straw that breaks the camels back?
somebodys gona snap, mcveigh style
Dems have been in control of the congress (aka spending) since 2006 dipshit. Yeah, Bush was NOT a conservative and never used the veto pen when he should have...but you can also place the blame squarely on Nancy Pelosi, Barnie Frank, Harry Reid, Chris Dodd and the Fed.Because it was so great under the Republicans //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
Barney's Frank is a liar. He was one of the democrats who soap boxxed nothing was wrong. He was a big reason people got loans they couldn't afford and he is trying to do the same with apartment housing. He lies and says he was for rental housing in the 90's-2000's yet is doing the very samething with condo's.Dems have been in control of the congress (aka spending) since 2006 dipshit. Yeah, Bush was NOT a conservative and never used the veto pen when he should have...but you can also place the blame squarely on Nancy Pelosi, Barnie Frank, Harry Reid, Chris Dodd and the Fed.
Yeah, well, the idiots in MA keep electing the ***.Barney's Frank is a liar. He was one of the democrats who soap boxxed nothing was wrong. He was a big reason people got loans they couldn't afford and he is trying to do the same with apartment housing. He lies and says he was for rental housing in the 90's-2000's yet is doing the very samething with condo's.
Then cities should be destroyed because they are known to be warmer than out in the country and black top pavement should be a no no. There is nothing that suggests rhat this is man made climate change as there has been more drastic climate change when man was nowhere near the same industrial wise.What you don't realize is the climate is not a linear system. Its a non-linear system in that if one thing changes, it can spark chaos in other parts of the system. So just a 1 degree change can give rise to DRASTIC changes in weather patterns.
I really hope youre being sarcastic. And if you dont think that this climate is at least slightly influenced by man then youre seriously misinformed. Yes for the very most part its a cycle that is about to start again, but you cant seriously believe that man hasnt effected the ozone and suchThen cities should be destroyed because they are known to be warmer than out in the country and black top pavement should be a no no. There is nothing that suggests rhat this is man made climate change as there has been more drastic climate change when man was nowhere near the same industrial wise.
Actually based on how this bill was legally fought it had nothing to do with science (this is over CO2 nothing more). The government didn't fight or even use "global warming" as a reason to be able to sell carbon emissions as they would have had a very very tough time making the point because they couldn't prove it. Over 3100 very very prominent scientists disagree with this man made global warming theory. Some say it is because they don't work for a government but also know that opinions of federally employed/financed scientists were compromised with the threat of taking away federal funding if scientists didn't agree. This bill is not just over gas, oil or electricity it goes into the home building sector which effects another 15-20% of the economy.I really hope youre being sarcastic. And if you dont think that this climate is at least slightly influenced by man then youre seriously misinformed. Yes for the very most part its a cycle that is about to start again, but you cant seriously believe that man hasnt effected the ozone and such