OP destruction 10+ year member CarAudio.com Elite 678 0 thibodaux, La Oct 9, 2005 Thread Starter #16 both of them say 1.25 ported is an optimum enclosure
DiamondFanatic 10+ year member CarAudio.com Elite 1,044 2 Oregon Oct 9, 2005 #17 yeah I would get the d6's. Just build the box to 1.25 cubes instead of 1.... They're nics subs, I would pick them for sure over W3's
yeah I would get the d6's. Just build the box to 1.25 cubes instead of 1.... They're nics subs, I would pick them for sure over W3's
GSteg 10+ year member Custom User Title 2,800 4 whee!! Oct 9, 2005 #18 both of them say 1.25 ported is an optimum enclosure Click to expand... JL audio also said the original 10w6 works great in a very small box, which we know isn't always true //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif 1.25 cubes is definitely better than 1.0 though.
both of them say 1.25 ported is an optimum enclosure Click to expand... JL audio also said the original 10w6 works great in a very small box, which we know isn't always true //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif 1.25 cubes is definitely better than 1.0 though.
Ignatowski 5,000+ posts CarAudio.com Veteran 7,102 26 Dirty South Oct 9, 2005 #19 hmmmmm. tempting. how would they perform in the enclosure above? 1 cuft and 500rms each tuned to 32 hz Click to expand... that combination is small,small on power and small on CF a D6 wants atleast 700+w and I have 900w going to each of mine
hmmmmm. tempting. how would they perform in the enclosure above? 1 cuft and 500rms each tuned to 32 hz Click to expand... that combination is small,small on power and small on CF a D6 wants atleast 700+w and I have 900w going to each of mine