Twin supercharged+nitrus GTO

I'm sorry you can't help yourself from jumping on little errors to point out completely irrelevant observations. And instead of being normal you chose to act like a 12 year old. Yet you're the one calling others little bitches. CLASSIC. Its ironic that a child like you has the audacity to point out errors in MY logic and posts when you can't even spell conscious correctly.
dude... it wasnt that i was trying to blow holes in your logic, the way it was worded was not what you meant. it came out completely backwards, and i went off what was said. i cant read your mind to know what you meant. me acting like a 12 year old, no, i went off of what was typed, youre the one that decided to start with the name calling/attack whatever you want to call it. perhaps youre the one in need of the maturing.

and no, i never claimed to be perfect at the english language, but you still knew what i meant to say, didnt you //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif . big difference between spelling error and syntax error.

it wasnt pointing out errors, if you had been mature enough to have a level head, you could have simply corrected yourself, told me what you meant to say, and avoided all of this. i tried to go about it the easy way, it was you that chose the hard road. again, not my fault you didnt say what you meant.

 
Actually, adding a turbocharger to a supercharged car would still negate any turbo lag that would be caused by converting it to a turbo setup. And since the turbo is what is feeding the engine it IS a turbo'd setup, fed by a supercharger. You failed to even think of that. Instead you went on flaming.
And its clarification, post Nazi.
that was an intentional misspelling, but thank you...

and i did think of that before i typed it. but if there isnt any turbo lag to begin with, then there isnt any need to negate it, is there?

youre too high strung man. again, all i did was go off of what you said, i made an ammendmant to what you said, then i posed a question. then you started with the defensive. forgive me for thinking you might have meant to say what you said...

 
Actually, adding a turbocharger to a supercharged car would still negate any turbo lag that would be caused by converting it to a turbo setup. And since the turbo is what is feeding the engine it IS a turbo'd setup, fed by a supercharger. You failed to even think of that. Instead you went on flaming.
And its clarification, post Nazi.
Eugenics is right. Superchargers don't have lag, so adding a supercharger to a turbo setup would eliminate turbo lag.

The superchager would whine in place of the turbo untill the turbo spools.

Kind of retarted.

I'd just have one nasty *** supercharger IMO.

Back to my corner. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/popcorn.gif.32dd9e22fd77e77bc3c907062768fcd2.gif

 
dude... it wasnt that i was trying to blow holes in your logic, the way it was worded was not what you meant. it came out completely backwards, and i went off what was said. i cant read your mind to know what you meant. me acting like a 12 year old, no, i went off of what was typed, youre the one that decided to start with the name calling/attack whatever you want to call it. perhaps youre the one in need of the maturing.
and no, i never claimed to be perfect at the english language, but you still knew what i meant to say, didnt you //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif . big difference between spelling error and syntax error.

it wasnt pointing out errors, if you had been mature enough to have a level head, you could have simply corrected yourself, told me what you meant to say, and avoided all of this. i tried to go about it the easy way, it was you that chose the hard road. again, not my fault you didnt say what you meant.
Yes, you tried to go about it the easy way by pointing it out instead of using your amazing logic to decipher what it obviously meant. And now you're baffled just BAFFLED that i'm getting amusement out of this. And why did it escalate? you took the word asshat out of context and decided to imply that i was a little bitch. You could've just ignored that too... you know, since you are so level headed and just let things slide. You never instigate.

But whatever, this is just water under the bridge as far as i'm concerned. You're a good poster, and a good member in general as you have been, and i'm sure you will be. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/veryhappy.gif.fec4fed33b4a1279cf10bdd45a039dae.gif

 
Eugenics is right. Superchargers don't have lag, so adding a supercharger to a turbo setup would eliminate turbo lag.
The superchager would whine in place of the turbo untill the turbo spools.

Kind of retarted.

I'd just have one nasty *** supercharger IMO.

Back to my corner. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/popcorn.gif.32dd9e22fd77e77bc3c907062768fcd2.gif
I did see one application where a guy who lived at a very high altitude had used a supercharger to power a massive turbo off of a simi. It was very fascinating. I wish i could find the build up again.

 
I did see one application where a guy who lived at a very high altitude had used a supercharger to power a massive turbo off of a simi. It was very fascinating. I wish i could find the build up again.

Sounds neat. Never seen anything like that.

The new duramax turbo diesels have a vein turbo system that generates a spool @ idle and also uses some variable sensor for idle. Thus, no lag.

 
Article...

DeltaHawk Inc. is currently testing a two-stroke, turbo- and supercharged, intercooled, four-cylinder 200-hp diesel engine with the cylinders in a 90-degree V configuration. The displacement is 202 cu. in. (3.3 liters). The V cylinder configuration was chosen because it can be more compact and lighter than opposed configurations, a claim that can be borne out since a flying model of this engine weighs 60 pounds less than the Lycoming IO-360.

The EagleHawk V-4 will deliver rated horsepower at 2,700 rpm. The pressurized inlet air and the exhaust gases are piston ported. This eliminates the complexity of the valve train. This closed-loop breathing method isn't quite as efficient as the uniflo design used in the TCM engine, but the manufacturer thought that simplicity was more important than optimum efficiency.

This engine is equipped with a supercharger to pressurize the airflow into the cylinders at low rpm and for starting. After the engine starts, the boosted air will be provided by the turbocharger. If the turbocharger fails, the supercharger has enough capacity to provide 50 percent of normal engine power.

DeltaHawk has two-stroke V-configuration engines on the drawing board for 100-, 150-, 200-, 300-, and 400-hp models.

Link Link Link to other article....

http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/05/a_lightweight_v.html

 
the world's fastest street production car is twin supercharged V8 pushing 806bhp on gasoline. If you put biofuel in it, you'd see 900+bhp
Koenigsegg CC-X
I thought it was the w16 quad turbo bugatti veyron

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Trey803

5,000+ posts
GAMECOCKS
Thread starter
Trey803
Joined
Location
SC
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
79
Views
1,430
Last reply date
Last reply from
joetama
IMG_20260515_202650612_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260515_202732887_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top