yo!! xbl^2 tweets??? im inYeah, I've check it out from time to time. There's still a ton of tweets that aren't covered. If you saw the "DFW High Noon" testing that went on with several tweeters, you might remember the xbl^2 tweet that Dan Wiggins has made and is waiting to OEM for someone. The guys doing the testing said it handled a 2khz and 1.6khz crossover just fine...but you can't get any unless some company decides to use them. They just lucked out and got some prototype...
I want some so badly...finally, the chance to run a 1.6k crossover point and run 8's in the doors without having to use horns...yay.yo!! xbl^2 tweets??? im in
Is there any place to buy them separately, or do you have to get them from a comp set?i have my ID XS-28's at 1.5@24
The issue had always been, where will I put the mids, and what size can I run? Also, efficiency is a big deal, as I love to crank my music...since most midranges are in the mid/upper 80's with efficiency, I'd really need to run two per side.
I have actually been playing around with that idea, using a pair of 3" fullranges/midranges and a tweeter on each side. I can fit up to 3" speakers in my a-pillar/dash area. Here's something I mocked up to try out...it's a pair of the TB alum/mag cone fullranges and a Vifa tweeter. I was planning on running 200hz and 6.3khz crossovers for the 3-way setup...just gotta get some 8's.
http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f92/RyanM923/3-way%20ideas/TBandVifa.jpg
Seems like I'd have too many cancellation issues having the mids that far apart...would I not? They'll be playing 200-6.3, so I figured keeping them as close as possible would be optimal.Consider putting the tweeter in the middle, so its an MTM instead of a TMM
With the proper slopes and Xover point, you wont have any cancellation directly caused by the speakers being far apart. When running a single woofer the lobe will fire out and downwards. Having the gap will improve balance, due to the distance from the side and bottom. Instead of a single null that creates a big dip in the response, you'll have two nulls but the second woofer will fill in some of the other null to each other, instead of one big dip you'll have two shallow dips; smoother response.Seems like I'd have too many cancellation issues having the mids that far apart...would I not? They'll be playing 200-6.3, so I figured keeping them as close as possible would be optimal.
The horns will always have a low stage, unless you implement some "super tweeters" on the dash to help lift it. But if you had the option to do that, that means you have the processing for it, which means you could run a 3 way front stage all along. So why not run a midbass, midrange, and a tweet. Imho it would be easier to tune compared to a horn. But that is just an opinion. Try it, if you end up liking, more power to you! If you end up making them work, please please let me hear it //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gifWell MTM it is...it might be a while though since I just don't have much time to work on anything these days. But I am going to grab those SLS 8's from azngotskills tomorrow, so I've got my dedicated mid covered.
Also, horns mightbe an option now...thos ID vids that use my truck are making me motivated to try out horns.