Trump being Trump

I don't care if it is a court opinion or a personal opinion. It's an opinion.
Good lord. The "sledgehammer" has a chipped head and a broken handle.

opinion​

With respect to law, “opinion” primarily refers to a judicial opinion, which is a court’s written statement explaining the court’s decision for the case. The opinion usually contains the following elements: name of the judge who wrote the opinion, statement of facts, the legal issues implicated, the court’s rationale and holding, and dicta.

Some common legal phrases that use the term “opinion” include:

  • “Majority opinion” is a judicial opinion that is joined by more than half the judges deciding a case.
  • Concurring opinion,” or concurrence, is the separate judicial opinion of an appellate judge who voted with the majority. Concurrences explain the appellate judge’s vote and may discuss parts of the decision in which the appellate judge had a different rationale.
  • Dissenting opinion,” or dissent, is the separate judicial opinion of an appellate judge who disagreed with the majority’s decision explaining the disagreement.
  • Unlike most judicial opinions, an “advisory opinion” is a court’s nonbinding statement interpreting the law.
  • Per curiam opinion” is a judicial opinion issued under the name of the deciding appellate court. Thus, unlike most judicial opinions, per curiam opinions do not identify the judge who wrote the opinion.
  • “Plurality opinion” is a judicial opinion that received the most votes of any opinion but not enough to be the majority opinion.
  • “Opinion evidence,” as outlined in Rule 701 in the Federal Rules of Evidence, is witness testimony based directly on the witness’s own thoughts, beliefs, or inferences.
  • Expert opinion,” as outlined in Rule 702 in the Federal Rules of Evidence and as opposed to opinion evidence, is testimony by an expert witness: a witness who possesses specialized knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education.
You poor confused Kamala voter.
Quite the strong support of your argument there, kid.
Getting closer to the "I'm rubber, you're glue" defense.
I have never said that. I said I can't convict someone of rape having not seen it happen. Not on a person word that it happened. People lie. Why can't you keep that in your head? Many things happen that I don't see. I didn't see the building of the Statue of Liberty but there she is.
Who said anything about rape?
Got something on your mind you want to tell us about? Guilt? A plan?
Show me the plan and prove he wrote it.
What plan? YOU brought it up, claiming there was no plan; it was all in his head.
I said one COULD have existed, not that one DID.

So, where's your proof that he never wrote a plan?
It was YOUR claim, not mine.

Where the **** did you get that? Could be mass hysteria. You know, like the far left has towards Trump.
So a mass hysteria that you accept as fact without witnessing what the masses are hallucinating.
But even though Trump was convicted of felonies, they didn't happen unless I witnessed them?
Way to fail at spinning.
Well they probably know how to spell know. Ironic that you spelled it wrong lol
Explain the irony.
We call it gravity. Who knows what it really is.
It's nothing. It doesn't exist since you never discovered it.
You should leap out a 9th story window to prove it.
That's twice you have misspelled believe. Are you in need of sleep?
I'm not a good typist. I transpose letters in the effort to type faster.
You do realize you are the one creating this narrative that I don't understand math. I actually know quite a bit of math as I had to use it a lot in my formulas.
Yet a simple average threw you for a months-long loop.
You can't understand that a calendar-year total cannot be calculated until the calendar year has ended.
You think 99.4% of a population can't be vaccinated.
You think if you walk into the average home, you will see 1/3 of a child somewhere.
You think an annual total of something has nothing to do with math.
You think that to determine a majority of items, you can't do it with 90, you have to have 100.
You think nominal price is the ONLY thing relevant when discussing price history.
And so on.

Do you feel like splitting people into classes like you do is healthy for America?
Ahhhh, that time travel thing again.
That time I traveled centuries into the past to create class structure.

I did it to make Trump look bad, you know.
When it happens I will be happy to.
I highly recommend holding your breath until it happens.
It may take a bit... it was like a week ago when I read the actual information that proves they had to turn misdemeanors into felonies to convict Trump because they didn't actually have anything worth convicting him for. Not to mention the tampering of the jury and improper judge decisions.
A "misdemeanor", huh? Wow, that time traveler is GOOD. And your "Harvard lawyer" is not so good.
The law on record in 2014 says it's a FELONY:
1755092452593.png


1755092469211.png



BTW - The appeal that was heard back in June had no reference to the supposed "change'' from misdemeanor to felony.

And it was filed after sentencing, which usually means it will be summarily dismissed.
But since Trump owns the SCOTUS, who knows what rules they'll break for his benefit?

Cruel huh? How so?
It's a fact that Eddie Van Halen is dead. A cruel fact, because we lost a great guitarist and musician, and his family lost him.
Facts can be cruel. But the cancer didn't kill him just to spite humanity. Cancer has no feelings. It just is.
No that's nature.
cruel - causing pain or suffering. "the winters are long, hard, and cruel"

If you don't think being shredded by a shark is pain and suffering, then go for it.
But cruel.
 
Last edited:
Good lord. The "sledgehammer" has a chipped head and a broken handle.

opinion​

With respect to law, “opinion” primarily refers to a judicial opinion, which is a court’s written statement explaining the court’s decision for the case. The opinion usually contains the following elements: name of the judge who wrote the opinion, statement of facts, the legal issues implicated, the court’s rationale and holding, and dicta.

Some common legal phrases that use the term “opinion” include:

  • “Majority opinion” is a judicial opinion that is joined by more than half the judges deciding a case.
  • Concurring opinion,” or concurrence, is the separate judicial opinion of an appellate judge who voted with the majority. Concurrences explain the appellate judge’s vote and may discuss parts of the decision in which the appellate judge had a different rationale.
  • Dissenting opinion,” or dissent, is the separate judicial opinion of an appellate judge who disagreed with the majority’s decision explaining the disagreement.
  • Unlike most judicial opinions, an “advisory opinion” is a court’s nonbinding statement interpreting the law.
  • Per curiam opinion” is a judicial opinion issued under the name of the deciding appellate court. Thus, unlike most judicial opinions, per curiam opinions do not identify the judge who wrote the opinion.
  • “Plurality opinion” is a judicial opinion that received the most votes of any opinion but not enough to be the majority opinion.
  • “Opinion evidence,” as outlined in Rule 701 in the Federal Rules of Evidence, is witness testimony based directly on the witness’s own thoughts, beliefs, or inferences.
  • Expert opinion,” as outlined in Rule 702 in the Federal Rules of Evidence and as opposed to opinion evidence, is testimony by an expert witness: a witness who possesses specialized knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education.
Still just an opinion.
Quite the strong support of your argument there, kid.
Getting closer to the "I'm rubber, you're glue" defense.
Duh.
Who said anything about rape?
Got something on your mind you want to tell us about? Guilt? A plan?
It's where you came up with your "if I didn't see it, it didn't happen" ********. Your memory slipping?
What plan? YOU brought it up, claiming there was no plan; it was all in his head.
I said one COULD have existed, not that one DID.
No, YOU brought it up using Bin Laden as your example. Yeah, your memory go bye bye.
So, where's your proof that he never wrote a plan?
It was YOUR claim, not mine.
This is part of the statement above.
So a mass hysteria that you accept as fact without witnessing what the masses are hallucinating.
But even though Trump was convicted of felonies, they didn't happen unless I witnessed them?
Way to fail at spinning.
Again, YOU are making a claim that I am accepting something then running with it.
Explain the irony.
The irony is you were using the word "know" which I would expect you to know how to spell. You spelled it wrong... that is the irony and it made me laugh. Why, because now you know what ironic really is.
It's nothing. It doesn't exist since you never discovered it.
You should leap out a 9th story window to prove it.
So instead of Rob the know-it-all explaining what gravity is you just attempted to be humorous. Didn't work.
I'm not a good typist. I transpose letters in the effort to type faster.
Yeah, texting in T9 is a ***** Gramps.
Yet a simple average threw you for a months-long loop.
You can't understand that a calendar-year total cannot be calculated until the calendar year has ended.
You think 99.4% of a population can't be vaccinated.
You think if you walk into the average home, you will see 1/3 of a child somewhere.
You think an annual total of something has nothing to do with math.
You think that to determine a majority of items, you can't do it with 90, you have to have 100.
You think nominal price is the ONLY thing relevant when discussing price history.
And so on.
Wow, that is a whole lot of speaking for me like you think you can read my mind. Let me ask you... are all these statements you just made about me facts?
Ahhhh, that time travel thing again.
That time I traveled centuries into the past to create class structure.
Comprehension Rob. I didn't say you created the classes.
I did it to make Trump look bad, you know.
We know you would if you could.
I highly recommend holding your breath until it happens.
You really think there will be no appeals? Come on Rob. It was a corrupt liberal judge with a tainted jury. Use your head.
BTW - The appeal that was heard back in June had no reference to the supposed "change'' from misdemeanor to felony.

And it was filed after sentencing, which usually means it will be summarily dismissed.
But since Trump owns the SCOTUS, who knows what rules they'll break for his benefit?
Stop it Rob. You act like the left never changes rules or laws so they can get away with ****. Jesus, why do you act like nobody does bad, only orange man bad? Are you that brainwashed?
It's a fact that Eddie Van Halen is dead. A cruel fact, because we lost a great guitarist and musician, and his family lost him.
Facts can be cruel. But the cancer didn't kill him just to spite humanity. Cancer has no feelings. It just is.

cruel - causing pain or suffering. "the winters are long, hard, and cruel"

If you don't think being shredded by a shark is pain and suffering, then go for it.

But cruel.
Shitty ways to die, sure... cruel... nah. Torture is cruel. Dying is an end.
 
I will say it again. You are carrying too much hatred and you are too biased to have an adult conversation about Trump.
This is where the left undermines itself. There certainly are connections between Manafort & Russia. The intelligence dossier was a typical Intel dossier: 1/3rd what we know, 1/3rd reasonable assumptions (guesses) & 1/3rd of wild ass conspiracy type stuff. The right focuses on all uncorroborated stuff and pretends (or is unaware) of the corroborated stuff or that it was corroborated. And outlets like CNN and True Blue warriors like Rob make it easy to ignore the damning evidence because when they're not lying, they're stretching twisting & distorting the truth; at best we get half truths and biased reporting from Team Blue.
 
This is where the left undermines itself. There certainly are connections between Manafort & Russia. The intelligence dossier was a typical Intel dossier: 1/3rd what we know, 1/3rd reasonable assumptions (guesses) & 1/3rd of wild ass conspiracy type stuff. The right focuses on all uncorroborated stuff and pretends (or is unaware) of the corroborated stuff or that it was corroborated. And outlets like CNN and True Blue warriors like Rob make it easy to ignore the damning evidence because when they're not lying, they're stretching twisting & distorting the truth; at best we get half truths and biased reporting from Team Blue.
Look at the things I say. I will make a specific statement to Rob that needs no reading into, no interpretations... just a direct and to the point statement and he will twist it up and come up with a spin to run with claiming I made the spin. This is the left.
 
Look at the things I say. I will make a specific statement to Rob that needs no reading into, no interpretations... just a direct and to the point statement and he will twist it up and come up with a spin to run with claiming I made the spin. This is the left.
I've experienced the same. Team Blue just keeps coming up with this ridiculousness - ie they lost their minds over the Sidney Sweeney AE ad.
 

View attachment 67217

"Bill Gates: Within 10 years, AI will replace many doctors and teachers—humans won’t be needed ‘for most things"



View attachment 67218
View attachment 67219
I know I've given you some grief over these "conspiracy theories," but I'm literally watching "them" create the software programs that will replace NPs and Docs. Many surgeries are already robotically assisted. I don't know if they'll be replacing docs since there is a shortage, but alot of doctor functions will be taken over by computers.
 
Still just an opinion.
You are thicker than a Mississippi mud pie.
Duh.

It's where you came up with your "if I didn't see it, it didn't happen" ********. Your memory slipping?
So when you asked if I witnessed Trump's crimes as a way to discount their validity, you didn't actually mean it?
More of your humorous sarcasm, or just "asking questions"?
No, YOU brought it up using Bin Laden as your example. Yeah, your memory go bye bye.
I didn't ask if he wrote them down, but YOU volunteered that he did NOT.
You comprehension and memory gone bye bye.
1755104428340.png


This is part of the statement above.

Again, YOU are making a claim that I am accepting something then running with it.
When I suggested you didn't believe since you didn't witness, you brought up the fact that so many others believe

That's an inference as to why it's believable to YOU.
The irony is you were using the word "know" which I would expect you to know how to spell. You spelled it wrong... that is the irony and it made me laugh. Why, because now you know what ironic really is.
What's "ironic" about me transposing two letters in a post?
"Ironic" would be me telling you that I'm a great typist, and then transposing the letters.
It would be unexpected that I would make such a claim, and then screw up.

Kind of like you claiming you studied anatomy extensively in Biology class, yet argue to the death that bones do not have nerves in them.

It would be EXPECTED that a person who studied anatomy so deeply would know **** a simple fact about anatomy.

Kind of like the DEA agent giving a class on gun safety, and shooting himself in the leg (foot?):
IRONIC

irony - happening in the opposite way to what is expected, and typically causing wry amusement because of this.

So instead of Rob the know-it-all explaining what gravity is you just attempted to be humorous. Didn't work.
You need me to explain gravity to you?
I'll leave it to the experts, who can teach to your level: https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/what-is-gravity/en/
Yeah, texting in T9 is a ***** Gramps.
Sure is. I knew a guy who could do it with his phone in his pocket, so his boss wouldn't catch him.
Wow, that is a whole lot of speaking for me like you think you can read my mind. Let me ask you... are all these statements you just made about me facts?
Unless you lied in all the posts about not understanding those things, then yes, they are facts.
Comprehension Rob. I didn't say you created the classes.
Your words say otherwise.

1755105043995.png

Or does the use of "you" 2x in your sentence refer to "all people in general"? I took it as if you (Michael) were addressing me (Rob).
I don't create classes. I don't "split people into" the classes that exist.
What made you think I did either of those things?

We know you would if you could.

You really think there will be no appeals? Come on Rob. It was a corrupt liberal judge with a tainted jury. Use your head.
He already appealed. It was heard in June. It was appealed after sentencing, which is normally an automatic dismissal.

As I said, we'll see if the SCOTUS that is in his pocket will break the rules for him yet again.

Stop it Rob. You act like the left never changes rules or laws so they can get away with ****. Jesus, why do you act like nobody does bad, only orange man bad? Are you that brainwashed?
So the "left" went back in time to at least 2014 to change the law so that Trump could be prosecuted in the 2020's?
That's pretty amazing.

If they are able to do that, why not just go further back, and prevent him rom being born? That would be less overall work.

Or maybe (hear me out here), it's a case that YOU are brainwashed, and will think up ANY excuse possible to defend him, no matter how absurd that excuse is.

Changing the law back in 2014, just to make Trump look bad today. Holy F.
Shitty ways to die, sure... cruel... nah. Torture is cruel. Dying is an end.
Huh? You think getting attacked by a shark is instant death?
Bethany Hamilton would disagree.
1755105460572.png
 
Last edited:
You are thicker than a Mississippi mud pie.

So when you asked if I witnessed Trump's crimes as a way to discount their validity, you didn't actually mean it?
More of your humorous sarcasm, or just "asking questions"?

I didn't ask if he wrote them down, but YOU volunteered that he did NOT.
You comprehension and memory gone bye bye.
View attachment 67224


When I suggested you didn't believe since you didn't witness, you brought up the fact that so many others believe

That's an inference as to why it's believable to YOU.

What's "ironic" about me transposing two letters in a post?
"Ironic" would be me telling you that I'm a great typist, and then transposing the letters.
It would be unexpected that I would make such a claim, and then screw up.

Kind of like you claiming you studied anatomy extensively in Biology class, yet argue to the death that bones do not have nerves in them.

It would be EXPECTED that a person who studied anatomy so deeply would know **** a simple fact about anatomy.

Kind of like the DEA agent giving a class on gun safety, and shooting himself in the leg (foot?):
IRONIC

irony - happening in the opposite way to what is expected, and typically causing wry amusement because of this.


You need me to explain gravity to you?
I'll leave it to the experts, who can teach to your level: https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/what-is-gravity/en/

Sure is. I knew a guy who could do it with his phone in his pocket, so his boss wouldn't catch him.

Unless you lied in all the posts about not understanding those things, then yes, they are facts.

Your words say otherwise.

View attachment 67225
Or does the use of "you" 2x in your sentence refer to "all people in general"? I took it as if you (Michael) were addressing me (Rob).
I don't create classes. I don't "split people into" the classes that exist.
What made you think I did either of those things?


He already appealed. It was heard in June. It was appealed after sentencing, which is normally an automatic dismissal.

As I said, we'll see if the SCOTUS that is in his pocket will break the rules for him yet again.


So the "left" went back in time to at least 2014 to change the law so that Trump could be prosecuted in the 2020's?
That's pretty amazing.

If they are able to do that, why not just go further back, and prevent him rom being born? That would be less overall work.

Or maybe (hear me out here), it's a case that YOU are brainwashed, and will think up ANY excuse possible to defend him, no matter how absurd that excuse is.

Changing the law back in 2014, just to make Trump look bad today. Holy F.

Huh? You think getting attacked by a shark is instant death?
Bethany Hamilton would disagree.
View attachment 67226

Come on man. The more someone proves you wrong the longer your post get.
 
I know I've given you some grief over these "conspiracy theories," but I'm literally watching "them" create the software programs that will replace NPs and Docs. Many surgeries are already robotically assisted. I don't know if they'll be replacing docs since there is a shortage, but alot of doctor functions will be taken over by computers.
I appreciate it, the comment very much, thank you.

Here's something else I know is real:

"WTF: Rep. Luna Describes Credible Reports of ‘Interdimensional Beings,’ Witnesses Claim ‘Movement Outside Time & Space’"

This is such good news:




It's about time humanity wakes up, you know? Haha 😉
 
Last edited:
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Jimi77

5,000+ posts
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
22,530
Views
152,874
Last reply date
Last reply from
shredder1
IMG_1882.jpeg

slater

    Oct 4, 2025
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20251004_120904_Photo Translator.jpg

1aespinoza

    Oct 4, 2025
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top