Trolls UNITE!!!

[LOLzthrowaway 10+ year member]

cotjones- Why is it you feel the need to lie about EVERYTHING? The italian superchip is a prime example. What drives you to lie like that?

 

[icpurplepplalot 5,000+ posts]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
Now this is were it becomes obvious that you are trolling. You have no idea what you are talking about, don't understand the theories I am refering to, and thus instead of saying "sry idk what you are talking about because i'm not educated in this field" you say "idk what you are talking about so you must be uneducated in this field."

It's just brilliant... applause! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rotflol.gif.b453361716769b8110ddefc85ff03cd2.gif

The sad thing, I'm not sure but I don't really think you are meaning to troll. I think you honestly think you know what you are talking about. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

Well here don't believe me? I'll put you in class.

Festinger's work on the theory of cognitive dissonance implies that when a personal belief or mental construct faces disconfirmation, that disconfirmation leads to an increase in proselytization given certain circumstances are present. These circumstances are:

1. The person must believe what he is saying.

2. There must be conviction.

3. There must be a maintained social support of the belief.

4. The believe must be amendable to unequivocal disconfirmation.

5. The belief must be disconfirmed.

My interaction with the people of this forum only verifies this theory.

Think I'm wrong? take it up with the academic community. I'm sure you are credible. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

I know exactly what you are referring to young man, it's they way you're saying them that is ignorant, and how you're trying to classify people into these subgroups. I think you should study up on your psychology and sociology before you start making claims that you actually know what you are talking about.

OP be trollin'.

Definitely this. To down play his own troll, he is stating others are trolling, and the using copy pasta to try and support his original hypothesis of the situation.

 

[peterweiner]

I've got no problem with you man but I do have a question. Seriously do you own any car audio or are you only here for the dome? Not poking fun, not starting anything, just wondering. Got any pics?

been into audio before i could drive. before i knew about ohms, i had 13 speakers hooked up to a home receiver at one time including subs under my furniture in my room to feel my *** vibrate because of how cool i thought i was, so needless to say, yes, im into audio. my last car setup was......

4 15 L7s ported subs up, port rear (middle)

4kw memphis ran at 1 ohm

old school US-100 ran at 1 ohm a channel with 4 jbl 2 ohm 5x7s

200 amp alt.

stock under the hood and 2 kinetik 2400s in the rear with big3 done and 0 gauge all around.

nice old school alpine unit

all in a 96 explorer

hit a 154 something at a local comp.

it was kind of loud. no pics at the moment.

 

[hzsogood 5,000+ posts]

YouTube - The Best Kesha Tik Tok (cover)

 

[RAM_Designs 5,000+ posts]

cotjones- Why is it you feel the need to lie about EVERYTHING? The italian superchip is a prime example. What drives you to lie like that?

This.

 

[Tiger Bass 5,000+ posts]

Trolling is bad. Mmmmkay?

 

[IamDeMan 5,000+ posts]

OP be trollin'.

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

cotjones- Why is it you feel the need to lie about EVERYTHING? The italian superchip is a prime example. What drives you to lie like that?

#1. I didn't lie, I admitted that i didn't know about that the first post I made about it. Don't believe me? go find the thread.

#2. Show me 1 thing I've lied about? Much less everything.

You are a pathetic piece of internet shit who has nothing better to do then go around spreading pointless non-sensical trash because it makes you feel better about your own useless life.

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

I know exactly what you are referring to young man,

I'm sure. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

it's they way you're saying them that is ignorant, and how you're trying to classify people into these subgroups. I think you should study up on your psychology and sociology before you start making claims that you actually know what you are talking about.

Definitely this. To down play his own troll, he is stating others are trolling, and the using copy pasta to try and support his original hypothesis of the situation.

I think you should figure out the correct field of study i'm referring to before you try to tell me I don't know what i'm talking about.

Again, If I'm wrong in my classifications and codings of behavior, give your alternative hypothesis.

Personally I just think you are butthurt over the fact that you are unable to do so and someone else is.

Why else would you have nothing specific to say whatsoever? Like I said GIVE ME A COUNTER EXAMPLE. My application of the cognitive dissonance theory and presenting self profiles seem extremely accurate. And you have absolutely no right to say otherwise SON. If you do, be my guest and try.

Lets also take into account that I specifically stated that my appraisal of behavior is just an opinion, and I acknowledged that my language would be more "matter of fact" then I meant.

Truth is, you don't know much about what i'm talking about, you've made that obvious (among other things) by the fact that you don't even know the correct field. You, in most of your posts, strike me as one of those "first year of college know-it-all hippies." mixed with a lifeless forum fiend troll.

 

[icpurplepplalot 5,000+ posts]

I'm sure. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

I think you should figure out the correct field of study i'm referring to before you try to tell me I don't know what i'm talking about.

Again, If I'm wrong in my classifications and codings of behavior, give your alternative hypothesis.

Personally I just think you are butthurt over the fact that you are unable to do so and someone else is.

Why else would you have nothing specific to say whatsoever? Like I said GIVE ME A COUNTER EXAMPLE. My application of the cognitive dissonance theory and presenting self profiles seem extremely accurate. And you have absolutely no right to say otherwise SON. If you do, be my guest and try.

Lets also take into account that I specifically stated that my appraisal of behavior is just an opinion, and I acknowledged that my language would be more "matter of fact" then I meant.

Truth is, you don't know much about what i'm talking about, you've made that obvious (among other things) by the fact that you don't even know the correct field. You, in most of your posts, strike me as one of those "first year of college know-it-all hippies." mixed with a lifeless forum fiend troll.

It's obvious that you won't be proved wrong in any way. I never said you were completely wrong with your basis, just how you approached the theory. Do I believe all that you say is completely factual? No. There are too many other variables that change from person to person.

 

[icpurplepplalot 5,000+ posts]

I'm sure. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

I think you should figure out the correct field of study i'm referring to before you try to tell me I don't know what i'm talking about.

Again, If I'm wrong in my classifications and codings of behavior, give your alternative hypothesis.

Personally I just think you are butthurt over the fact that you are unable to do so and someone else is.

Why else would you have nothing specific to say whatsoever? Like I said GIVE ME A COUNTER EXAMPLE. My application of the cognitive dissonance theory and presenting self profiles seem extremely accurate. And you have absolutely no right to say otherwise SON. If you do, be my guest and try.

Lets also take into account that I specifically stated that my appraisal of behavior is just an opinion, and I acknowledged that my language would be more "matter of fact" then I meant.

Truth is, you don't know much about what i'm talking about, you've made that obvious (among other things) by the fact that you don't even know the correct field. You, in most of your posts, strike me as one of those "first year of college know-it-all hippies." mixed with a lifeless forum fiend troll.

It's obvious that you won't be proved wrong in any way. I never said you were completely wrong with your basis, just how you approached the theory. Do I believe all that you say is completely factual? No. There are too many other variables that change from person to person.

 

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

Cotjones is really smart.

 

[anton lavey]

FAIL...

 

[slim8605 10+ year member]

OP is a troll, ***, etc etc

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

It's obvious that you won't be proved wrong in any way. I never said you were completely wrong with your basis, just how you approached the theory. Do I believe all that you say is completely factual? No. There are too many other variables that change from person to person.

It would be more obvious if anyone had tried even a little bit to prove me wrong. But they (including you) have not.

Obviously I have not approached the theory 100% ideally, No one can do that.

Anyway since you won't or maybe can't give factual reasons why I am so wrong, let me give you a head start.

#1. My observations can possibly influence the subject's behavior.

#2. My observations only take into account a forum in which my goals are known and thus do not fairly merit the value of being generalizable.

However, something that was made plainly obvious is that I was doing this on purpose, because enlightening the subject to his behavior may be useful in this case.