He obviously won't Rob, he read a synopsis and now thinks he's Marx.
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
Now this is were it becomes obvious that you are trolling. You have no idea what you are talking about, don't understand the theories I am refering to, and thus instead of saying "sry idk what you are talking about because i'm not educated in this field" you say "idk what you are talking about so you must be uneducated in this field."
It's just brilliant... applause! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rotflol.gif.b453361716769b8110ddefc85ff03cd2.gif
The sad thing, I'm not sure but I don't really think you are meaning to troll. I think you honestly think you know what you are talking about. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif
Well here don't believe me? I'll put you in class.
Festinger's work on the theory of cognitive dissonance implies that when a personal belief or mental construct faces disconfirmation, that disconfirmation leads to an increase in proselytization given certain circumstances are present. These circumstances are:
1. The person must believe what he is saying.
2. There must be conviction.
3. There must be a maintained social support of the belief.
4. The believe must be amendable to unequivocal disconfirmation.
5. The belief must be disconfirmed.
My interaction with the people of this forum only verifies this theory.
Think I'm wrong? take it up with the academic community. I'm sure you are credible. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
