Trolls UNITE!!!

Your "facts" are not factual in any way. I find your posts rather humorous as you really seem to believe your so called theories, yet they are totally asinine.
proof? let me get ahead of schedule here and just say............... like i thought.

 
do you enjoy never admitting youre wrong? just curious. because someones gonna smack the shit out of you soon for doin that. just a fyi.
what college you go to snot?
as for you though, you can stfu as well. you and your idiotic punktimes crew are ALWAYS trying to use big words because it makes your penor bigger. big words or not, id still slap the shit out of all of yous and THATS ALL THAT MATTERS.
You seem kinda mad there, whats up with that, Cool Hand?

 
Your "facts" are not factual in any way. I find your posts rather humorous as you really seem to believe your so called theories, yet they are totally asinine.
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

The cognitive dissonance and social comparison theories are asinine??!?!?! BAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Go to school son. Lay off the crack.

You aren't questioning me, you are questioning some of the most highly regarded minds in social scientific research.

For your own good GTFO, you are making yourself look dumb.

 
do you enjoy never admitting youre wrong? just curious. because someones gonna smack the shit out of you soon for doin that. just a fyi.
what college you go to snot?
The entire premise he is using is interesting and progressive, however not beyond a reasonable amount of expectation.

This statement really attempts to draw me in personally. The reason for this is that he can't argue against theory, research, or objectively descriptive perspectives, but he can argue against a personal stance all day. This is his goal.

Additionally, he attempts to draw me into a double bind with wording, and its about time... Such behavior was highly expected in a situation like this.

Remember that 99% of the time, he won't care about the actual issue he discusses as much as he just wants to spark arguments or even hatred toward his alter-ego or "posting self."

The end question is progressive in his purpose because he is yet again reaching out for what he perceives as my personal interests.

Since my education has been called into question he tries to tempt me to humor his argument by wanting to brag about my scholastic merit. However, this attempt fails because the assumption he is making is that I want to show off my education, when in fact my only goal is to blatantly mentally profile him and his behavior.

Why because 1. I'm bored, and 2. worst case scenario I've got nothing to lose, best case scenario I have something to write a research paper about and he desists at trolling.

Regardless, none of his responses are beyond a measure of significant content analysis.

 
The entire premise he is using is interesting and progressive, however not beyond a reasonable amount of expectation.
This statement really attempts to draw me in personally. The reason for this is that he can't argue against theory, research, or objectively descriptive perspectives, but he can argue against a personal stance all day. This is his goal.

Remember that 99% of the time, he won't care about the actual issue he discusses as much as he just wants to spark arguments or even hatred toward his alter-ego or "posting self."

The end question is progressive in his purpose because he is yet again reaching out for what he perceives as my personal interests.

Since my education has been called into question he tries to tempt me to humor his argument by wanting to brag about my scholastic merit. However, this attempt fails because the assumption he is making is that I want to show off my education, when in fact my only goal is to blatantly mentally profile him and his behavior.

Why because 1. I'm bored, and 2. worst case scenario I've got nothing to lose, best case scenario I have something to write a research paper about and he desists at trolling.

Regardless, none of his responses are beyond a measure of significant content analysis.
i see copy and paste are friends of yours.

 
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
The cognitive dissonance and social comparison theories are asinine??!?!?! BAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Go to school son. Lay off the crack.

You aren't questioning me, you are questioning some of the most highly regarded minds in social scientific research.

For your own good GTFO, you are making yourself look dumb.
They way you are applying the theories are asinine dipshit, maybe if you actually knew what you were talking about you would understand where I am coming from, instead of read a synopsis and thinking you know all.

 
They way you are applying the theories are asinine dipshit, maybe if you actually knew what you were talking about you would understand where I am coming from, instead of read a synopsis and thinking you know all.
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

If you only knew.

 
You're really getting old Rob, it's not even fun anymore to try and engage you, it's just too easy.
not quite. the response says enough. thanks for trying though and please come again.

i thought id help and put your response in better words for ya......"rob, you are too dam good so ill use your phrases because i have nothing to come back with." better?

 
i see copy and paste are friends of yours.
Here is another expected response. However on this one there several likely possibilities in his purpose.

1. he lacks the intelligence to understand how highly specified my argument was to his behavior, thus he truly does believe my argument was copied and pasted. (not likely, he's a troll, not a dumbass)

2. He is again attempting to draw me in with the temptation of defending my own personal intelligence, Trying this would be essentially the same as what he tried to do in his previous post to me, but perhaps he just wanted to give it another shot.

3. He is again being progressive and using another resource he has at his disposal. (the other forum members.) This is likely closest to his true goal because he has seen me engage other's arguments but not his own. This statement is a very common statement when the poster would like to discredit the other person in the eyes of other viewers. If he can get other viewers (who I WILL engage) to argue with me, by extension, he has engaged me. Even if only indirectly.

 
Here is another expected response. However on this one there several likely possibilities in his purpose.
1. he lacks the intelligence to understand how highly specified my argument was to his behavior, thus he truly does believe my argument was copied and pasted. (not likely, he's a troll, not a dumbass)

2. He is again attempting to draw me in with the temptation of defending my own personal intelligence, Trying this would be essentially the same as what he tried to do in his previous post to me, but perhaps he just wanted to give it another shot.

3. He is again being progressive and using another resource he has at his disposal. (the other forum members.) This is likely closest to his true goal because he has seen me engage other's arguments but not his own. This statement is a very common statement when the poster would like to discredit the other person in the eyes of other viewers. If he can get other viewers (who I WILL engage) to argue with me, by extension, he has engaged me. Even if only indirectly.
and again, i am correct. will you guys ever quit?

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

cotjones

10+ year member
CarAudio.com Veteran
Thread starter
cotjones
Joined
Location
Wilmington, NC
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
108
Views
2,220
Last reply date
Last reply from
Spider Monkey
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top