Treo 3.1 Vs Treo SSX 1500.1

[donpisto 5,000+ posts]

Yeah i was gonna suggest gettin your amp benchtested, that way you will know for sure. as for the treo ssx 1500.1, I emailed treo a few days ago because I was curious about it before I read this since I recently got mine. They said it does 3000w @ 1 ohm @ 14.4V

 

[donpisto 5,000+ posts]

Carl did you ever get that paypal? BTW why dont you get the amp bench tested . I am sure it does 3000 @ 1ohm I have heard the 1500.1's do that, and I have also heard they only do 2500 on a 14 volt system. They are very solid amps. I had one, but I needed another to get the 5000 watts a I wanted. O well I ended up buying a DD Z1.

lucky bastard..i wish i could have afforded a z1...a grand (for a used one) is too much for my blood at the moment

 

[SiX 10+ year member]

Well I'll be running them at .7 each, if you guys think they can handle it, if not, you think thet'll each do 2500 @ 1.4ohm on 14.4v?

 

[donpisto 5,000+ posts]

It may not be too safe to run at .7 ohms. Definitely email Treo and find out. but @ 1.4 ohms you may not get 2500 exactly, but it will be roughly 2300. 200w really isnt that much of difference and won't give that much of a dB gain. I wouldnt worry about it unless .x dB is crucial to you.

 

[BlackMaxima 10+ year member]

well if you look at other companies and their powerful amps their priced quite high as well. here are a few examples:
orion 2500d (when they had them) - 1600

orion 5000d - 1500

RF T30001bd - 1900

RF T20001bd - 1300

Lanzar OPTI4000D - 1900

Visonik V4000XD - 1600

MA Audio HK4000D - 1700

I think its fairly priced based on what it can do and its quality. Still, too much for my blood, but thats why I buy used or would go to a dealer to see what they can get it for me

i would say all the amps you have there are not comparable to treo.

 

[ngsm13 5,000+ posts]

It may not be too safe to run at .7 ohms. Definitely email Treo and find out. but @ 1.4 ohms you may not get 2500 exactly, but it will be roughly 2300. 200w really isnt that much of difference and won't give that much of a dB gain. I wouldnt worry about it unless .x dB is crucial to you.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

.7ohms is the DCR, this coil is the same as a 1ohm NOMINAL coil.

nG

 

[Ford302Redneck 10+ year member]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
.7ohms is the DCR, this coil is the same as a 1ohm NOMINAL coil.

nG

Seems we really need a STICKY on this...

 

[ngsm13 5,000+ posts]

I'll whip something up tonight. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

nG

 

[SiX 10+ year member]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
.7ohms is the DCR, this coil is the same as a 1ohm NOMINAL coil.

nG

Ok, So my Destroyers will be dual .7s and each amp will be run at 1.4, unless the 18"s can handle each amp at .7, then I'll get dual 1.4s... What's the vote? Should the Destroyers each handle 3000+ rms daily?